Could ask the same thing from you? They been after this man and anyone associated with him for 7 years. 1st impeachment they said the russia, russia hoax was going to land him in prison; all charges was found to be unfounded by their hand picked Mueller and found out to be $1 million dollar paid scam by Hillary.
You have your "facts" messed up. The first impeachment was over the Ukrainian phone call. And releasing the transcript of the phone call did not prove innocence -- it actually makes it appear he was saying that we'll give you the money for the missiles when you announce you are investigating Joe Biden.
Second, every "Russia, Russia, Russia" investigation that I'm aware of was run by Republicans. Democrats did not appoint Mueller, he was appointed by Trump's own DoJ, specifically Trump appointee Rod Rosenstein -- after AG Sessions recused himself for unreported contacts with the Russian ambassador. Last, the Mueller investigation did not investigate Pres. Trump -- as you'd know if you had read the report. It did find plenty of ties between the Trump campaign and the Russians; and lays out how Pres. Trump attempted to obstruct the investigation.
The idea that it was a "scam paid for by Hillary" was a claim made by Special prosecutor Durham, who was appointed to "investigate the investigators." The problem was, he never provided any evidence for it. The trial, the one that was supposed to supply all the evidence, resulted an acquittal -- Durham could not provide the evidence for a crime. Durhams investigation lasted almost twice as long as the Mueller investigation and has found no evidence that the investigation was to "pick on Trump."
Again, every Russia investigation (at least that I'm aware of) was run by Republicans -- the House investigation (which finished before Democrats retook the House in 2018), the Senate Investigation (again, prior to 2018 when Republicans controlled the Senate, and even Mueller, who was appointed and his investigation overseen by a Republican prosecutor in Trump's DoJ.
2nd impeachment over a phone call but they were totally surprised when Pres. Trump released the transcript where a perfect phone call; yet shifty schiff and his wanta be movie star still parroted non existing gangster style parody and laughed off the stage, a failed actor and script writer.
Sorry, no. The second impeachment was Trump's attempt at stealing the 2020 election -- to include his inaction while the Capitol was being overrun, his attempts to get VP Pence to not count the votes of the lawful Electors that were certified from various states, and instead count electors that voted for Trump and were not certified by the relevant officials in those states, etc. And this, besides not being "false charges" even garnered Republican votes -- with many Republicans agreeing Trump was guilty but didn't want to convict the, by then, former President.
Then it was taxes and Pres. Trump played them all the way, what ever happen to it? nothing when whats her face got it on the air and was flabbergasted because he paid so much in taxes, talk about a nothing burger.
I'm sorry, they were flabbergasted by how much he paid in taxes? You mean
like, "The documents confirmed that Mr Trump paid no federal taxes in 2020 and only $750 (£622) in 2016 and 2017." Also how is it that Presidents are supposed to be audited by the IRS every year but Trump wasn't audited -- at least until Congress asked about it 2019? So, no, not a "nothing burger" but, to the best of my knowledge, not anything that is currently being investigated (and definitely nothing that the Republican Congress will investigate).
Time after time these people went after until now they just make up false accusations and try to pend him on A Stormy case that was dismissed in '20' when stormy signed an agreement and even she said it never happened.
Yes, such "false accusations" that it caused Trump's lawyer felony charges and a time in "Club Fed."
Now they have the weakest case of all with a inappropriate content star, and known political hack/lier where now the Democrat-never voted for Republican Dershowitz says any 1st year law student wouldn't even take this case and is the weakest case he has ever seen.
Yes, we've all heard how Dershowitz is this great Democrat, even while he defended Trump every step of the way the last 7 years. He is hardly a neutral observer and, maybe isn't a Republican, but appears to be a huge Trump fan and apologist.
Braggs should be and will be after his 10 minutes of fame will be held for Prosecutor mis-conduct. The Ga. case is even weaker, no one can be indicted for a phone call which is all it was, a perfectly legal phone call.
Let me know when Bragg is indicted for misconduct... I won't hold my breath. And, no, the Georgia case is not even weaker. In fact, I have to question why the FBI gets wiretaps, since "no one can be indicted for a phone call." Yes, if they hear a mob boss order a murder on a phone call, they've never prosecuted it. You might want to try that statement again.
It is also apparently two phone calls, with one of them Trump apparently asking the Speaker of the Georgia House to overturn the Georgia 2020 election for Trump. No, if that claim being reported by one of the jurors is true, that is not a weak case.
