The PB leaders trial is still going on. (Day 55 by some counts.) On the last day of testimony (Wed), the first of two defendants expected to testify on their behalf (sic) Zach Rehl of Philly was on the stand. His laywer stretched out his testimony with an dull list of elements of the various crimes (Did you X?) and other things (incuding minute long shuffles through her note pad "looking" for something) in an apparent attempt to hit the long break (due to a juror scheduling issue) before the start of cross-examination by the prosecution. She finished about an hour before the end of court and then a lawyer for a different PB filled up the rest of the day and crossed over into the morning today.
It's a little harder to tell what is happening today since the Judge in a fit of pique over a leak on Thursday, decided to close the media room and there is no live tweeting today. (The reporters can only use pen+paper, then type it up during breaks.) Thursday there was a sealed hearing (about possible jury intimidation/tampering issues) and the court officials forgot to turn off the feed to the media room (where they can use cell phones and laptops and the internet) and three outlets (incl. CNN) reported on the sealed hearing despite desperate begging to reporters from the defense attorneys to the reports to not report what they heard from the sealed courtroom. (It was not the prosecution begging, most likely, because that would implicate 1st amendment issues.)
So the most important days of the most important (so far) jan 6 trial are going to be less well reported.
Late in the afternoon the Judge did open the media room back up, but before that we have an example of why the constitution provides an absolute right to not testify against yourself, but if you do...
Setup: Prosecutors allege the Proud Boys used as a recruiting tool a video from a Nov 2020 rally in DC of a woman brandishing a knife and surrounded by PBs that the PBs claimed was antifa being knocked over the head with a helmet before crumpling to the ground.
Rehl (the testifying defendant) denied it.
Then the prosecutor asked him if he was ecstatic about the violence in the video. Rehl dodged, weaved, and wandered about the answer, but didn't say yes/no? So the prosecutor asks again. Defense attorneys object each time. Repeat 7 times. (after the 5th time the prosecutor says "I've got all day". Finally after the seventh time:
Rehl: Ecstatic? No. much worse. woman gets hit--it's hard to defend to the public, right?
Prosecutor: you didn't just put the video on Parler, did you?
Rehl: there's a lot of different variations of that video. it went viral.
Prosecutor shows Parler post from Rehl with video captioned "she got what she deserved."
Prosecutor: you sent this to your mother?
When he resists answering, the prosecutor walks him through his text messages to his mom including one with the video attached that read "This [is] one of my Philly guys. ENJOY!!!"
And then because Rehl won't just verify that the video is the same one previously seen by the jury the prosecutor plays it for him.
Then the prosecutor walks him through other postings with captions including phrases like "when some antifa scum tried stabbing some PBs" and "careful what you ask for" and finally one with contact information for recruits. After each posting Rehl's answer again compelled the prosecutor to show the video again and again and again.
After the jury left Rehl's lawyer moved for a mistrial (it's been a while, but there have been a lot of mistrial motions) "Its just not a fair way... I guess they're going to play it until they inflame the jury..."
Prosecutor: " that's not on the govt. When we play video to establish hes sending to his mom, that's on Mr. Rehl.", etc.
Judge Kelly agrees, saying its not grounds for a mistrial.
What was that all about? The prosecution was trying to tear down the PB narrative that they were only interested in "self defense" and didn't use violence as a recruitment. I think they accomplished that.
The cross-exam of defendant Rehl continues tomorrow. Then probably the testimony of defendant Pezzola. (No I don't expect that to go well for him either.)
I sourced this from the live (and not quite live) tweets of reporters Brandi_Buchman and rparloff. Most of their tweets are about the trial. (No direct links, the PBs violate CF profanity rules about every other quoted text, video, or posting.)