Let’s compare our confirmation biases then.
My contribution in this thread was to explain the evidence of marine fossils on Mt Everest via plate tectonics.
This is evidence based supported by the following examples which is by no means exhaustive.
(1) Mt Everest is still increasing in height at rate of around 4 mm/year as measured by satellite GPS and photogrammetric methods.
(2) The Indian plate is still moving despite colliding with the Eurasian plate at a rate of 5cm/year as measured by satellite GPS.
(3) The collision zone triggers earthquake activity and the Himalayas is an active seismic zone.
My opinion is evidence based.
Yours on the other hand is the use of confirmation bias 101.
You ignore the evidence and attempt to explain it within a biblical narrative.
It is also illogical if marine fossils are found on Mt Everest as a result of a global flood, then they should be found anywhere on the planet.
Open cut mines and quarries anywhere on the planet should reveal the presence of marine fossils which is simply not the case.
You are obviously unaware the fossilization process is a slow process where even under the most favourable conditions fossils do not form earlier than around 10,000 years.
By bringing fossils into the mix you are contradicting the Bible as the great flood supposedly occurred far later than 10,000 years ago.