• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Are we subject to the Old Covenant today?

Bob S

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dec 5, 2015
4,947
2,355
90
Union County, TN
✟834,411.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Lulav said:

The wedding Banquet and crowning of the King has not happened yet.
That has absolutely nothing to do with Jesus fulfilling what He came to this Earth to do. You are claiming Jesus failed His mission.

I'm speaking to those who believe that Jesus fulfilled everything so the Commandments are done away with,
So, you do not believe the following:
6 He has made us competent as ministers of a new covenant—not of the letter but of the Spirit; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life. 7 Now if the ministry that brought death, which was engraved in letters on stone, came with glory, so that the Israelites could not look steadily at the face of Moses because of its glory, transitory though it was, 8 will not the ministry of the Spirit be even more glorious? 9 If the ministry that brought condemnation was glorious, how much more glorious is the ministry that brings righteousness! 10 For what was glorious has no glory now in comparison with the surpassing glory. 11 And if what was transitory came with glory, how much greater is the glory of that which lasts! 2cor3
You tell us the new covenant is the warmed-over version of the old one. Paul, in the verses above, tells us it is a new covenant of the Spirit and not the letter. Then he explains what happened. The guidance of the ten commandments WERE only transitory, meaning temporary and lost all their glory. What IS glorious is the ministry of the Holy Spirit. Jesus did what He came to do, He negated the old covenant with all its ritual laws, (morality is forever) and gave each one of us the indwelling of the Holy Spirit as our guide.


A reading of Revelation 19 might also help you to understand that it hasn't happened yet.
That has nothing to do with what Jesus came to do. Either He did or didn't. I, for one, believe He did all that He came to do and I am sorry for those who either don't or deny.
 
Upvote 0

Lulav

Y'shua is His Name
Aug 24, 2007
34,149
7,245
✟509,998.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
Hmmm? You are mixing two things here. Tom Teruah is a festival of remembrance. It is specified in the fall during harvest, on the first day of the seventh month, and has nothing to do with the crowning of the King.
Doug, just to give you an idea who you are conversing with so we don't have to go through this again, I am Jewish, a Jewish believer in Messiah Yeshua. I know what the feasts of the LORD are, and keep them as best as can be where I live. So to start with the first feast we are talking about is YOM (means day) Teruah - Day of Blowing. Now it has been handed down that the LORD didn't specify why we were to do this but there are puzzle pieces to put together if one is willing
The sound of the shofar is analogous to the trumpet-blasts that announce the coronation of a king. It is said that God created the world on Rosh Hashanah (Yom Teruah) and assumed the role of its Sovereign, and in the sounding of the shofar we acknowledge Him as our King.
Another of the reasons for blowing the shofar is to evoke the memory of the binding of Isaac, and Abraham and Isaac’s willingness to sacrifice himself to do the LORD's will, to coronate the LORD as King over ourselves. The blast of the shofar always heralded the coronation of the King, and Rosh Hashanah is the day on which we declare Hashem’s sovereignty. So it looks back on the King of the Universe from the Day of creation until that Kingship is handed over to Messiah.
The day of atonement is a foreshadowing of Christ. He fulfilled this day by becoming the atonement that was made for us to cleanse us (Lev 16:30).
Yes so we see him between the other two. He was the spotless lamb and the goats which bore the sins of Israel.
Again, Sukkot is a festival of remembrance of the time of living in tents and hits for 40 years after leaving Egypt. It has nothing to do with the King.
I don't know what 'hits for 40 years' means but yes it does have everything to do with THE KING. It pictures the time when he will dwell among us. Do you think that it is only recalling living in tents? Yes they lived in tents, surrounding the tabernacle wherein the arc of the covenant was and it is called Gods Throne.
We look forward to that day once again. It is considered to be the time of the wedding supper of the Lamb.
No disrespect or insult is offered or intended to the Lord God. But these days are no longer Law. They are traditions that are still kept, but they are no longer commands, because they are all part of the Old Covenant that has been made obsolete in Christ!
The LORD calls them HIS FEASTS, His appointments with his chosen people. They are dates to teach his salvation plan which is not completed yet. So Messiah would CERTAINLY not make them obsolete, the whole must be fulfilled.
 
Upvote 0

Lulav

Y'shua is His Name
Aug 24, 2007
34,149
7,245
✟509,998.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
Lulav said:The wedding Banquet and crowning of the King has not happened yet.


That has absolutely nothing to do with Jesus fulfilling what He came to this Earth to do. You are claiming Jesus failed His mission.
It has everthing to do with rebutting that he fulfilled everything in the Torah written about him.

Has the Wedding Banquet and crowning of the King of kings happened yet?

And please don't put words in my mouth I never and would never say Yeshua failed at anything.
So, you do not believe the following:
6 He has made us competent as ministers of a new covenant—not of the letter but of the Spirit; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life. 7 Now if the ministry that brought death, which was engraved in letters on stone, came with glory, so that the Israelites could not look steadily at the face of Moses because of its glory, transitory though it was, 8 will not the ministry of the Spirit be even more glorious? 9 If the ministry that brought condemnation was glorious, how much more glorious is the ministry that brings righteousness! 10 For what was glorious has no glory now in comparison with the surpassing glory. 11 And if what was transitory came with glory, how much greater is the glory of that which lasts! 2cor3
No, I do not believe that God HOLY Covenant written on stone by his own finger is a 'ministry that brought death'.
If you keep the commandments they bring LIFE! It says so repeatedly by the LORD in the TORAH and the PROPHETS. Keeping God's commandments brings righteousness, just as it did for Abraham.

You tell us the new covenant is the warmed-over version of the old one.
No, I don't use that kind of dismissive, disrespectful wording to speak of God's Holy Covenant.
Paul, in the verses above, tells us it is a new covenant of the Spirit and not the letter. Then he explains what happened. The guidance of the ten commandments WERE only transitory, meaning temporary and lost all their glory. What IS glorious is the ministry of the Holy Spirit.
I hate to tell you this Bob, but the Holy Spirit was active back then too. Comparing the ten commandments to the way Moses looked after coming back from getting them from the LORD is a far stretch.

Tell me how is 'I am the LORD your GOD' 'transitory' or 'Fleeting'?

Jesus did what He came to do, He negated the old covenant with all its ritual laws, (morality is forever) and gave each one of us the indwelling of the Holy Spirit as our guide.
As I said, the Holy Spirit was given back then as well.

"16 Then the Lord said to Moses, “Gather for me seventy men of the elders of Israel, whom you know to be the elders of the people and officers over them, and bring them to the tent of meeting, and let them take their stand there with you. 17 And I will come down and talk with you there. And I will take some of the Spirit that is on you and put it on them, and they shall bear the burden of the people with you, so that you may not bear it yourself alone."​

In the Torah you will find they way Israel knew what to look for when anticipating the Messiah was the prophecy the LORD gave.

  1. "15 “The Lord your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among you, from your brothers—----it is to him you shall listen— 16 just as you desired of the Lord your God at Horeb on the day of the assembly, when you said, ‘Let me not hear again the voice of the Lord my God or see this great fire any more, lest I die.’"

The LORD tells them to look for a prophet like him, Moses. Now knowing the Torah inside and out they knew what to look for.

A man who would do miracles and wonders
A man that would lead the people into righteousness
A man that would have the Spirit of God in him...etc.

The Father at the 'transfiguration' reiterates this when he says to John, Peter and James up on the high mountain :

"behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them, and a voice from the cloud said,​
“This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased; listen to him.”"​


Lulav said: A reading of Revelation 19 might also help you to understand that it hasn't happened yet.

That has nothing to do with what Jesus came to do. Either He did or didn't. I, for one, believe He did all that He came to do and I am sorry for those who either don't or deny.
Maybe you should tell him that since he is the one giving direct testimony there.

I won't agree that Rev 19 has happened already and don't need your pity because of it. Did you read Rev 19?

"“Hallelujah!​
For the Lord our God​
the Almighty reigns.​
7 Let us rejoice and exult​
and give him the glory,​
for the marriage of the Lamb has come,​
and his Bride has made herself ready;"​

Has that happened yet?

Has he come on his white horse yet?

5 And he who was seated on the throne said, “Behold, I am making all things new.” Also he said, “Write this down, for these words are trustworthy and true.” 6 And he said to me, “It is done! I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end.​

That's when things are new and it is finished, then shall the Torah be passed away as it will not longer be needed.
 
Upvote 0

Doug Brents

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2021
1,763
362
52
Atlanta, GA
✟13,253.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Doug, just to give you an idea who you are conversing with so we don't have to go through this again, I am Jewish, a Jewish believer in Messiah Yeshua. I know what the feasts of the LORD are, and keep them as best as can be where I live.
I am very glad to hear of another one of my Jewish brothers is also a brother in Christ. I am very glad to hear that.
So to start with the first feast we are talking about is YOM (means day) Teruah - Day of Blowing. Now it has been handed down that the LORD didn't specify why we were to do this
Stop right there. This is as far as we can go Biblically. God didn’t say why to blow the shofar, He simply said that this day, the first day of the 7th month, was a day of blowing horns. We can suppose, or conjecture, or hypothesize all we want, but the Law of Moses doesn’t give any further details.
but there are puzzle pieces to put together if one is willing
The sound of the shofar is analogous to the trumpet-blasts that announce the coronation of a king. It is said that God created the world on Rosh Hashanah (Yom Teruah) and assumed the role of its Sovereign, and in the sounding of the shofar we acknowledge Him as our King.
Another of the reasons for blowing the shofar is to evoke the memory of the binding of Isaac, and Abraham and Isaac’s willingness to sacrifice himself to do the LORD's will, to coronate the LORD as King over ourselves. The blast of the shofar always heralded the coronation of the King, and Rosh Hashanah is the day on which we declare Hashem’s sovereignty. So it looks back on the King of the Universe from the Day of creation until that Kingship is handed over to Messiah.
All of this may very well be true, and these things might be good things to associate with the blowing of the shofar. But God does not say any of this.
I don't know what 'hits for 40 years' means
Sorry, I fat-fingered it (or my autocorrect botched it). It was supposed to be “huts”.
but yes it does have everything to do with THE KING. It pictures the time when he will dwell among us. Do you think that it is only recalling living in tents? Yes they lived in tents, surrounding the tabernacle wherein the arc of the covenant was and it is called Gods Throne.
We look forward to that day once again. It is considered to be the time of the wedding supper of the Lamb.
That may be the picture you were taught, but that is not the picture God laid out when He gave the Law.

Lev 23:33, 39-44 - “Again the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, 34 “Speak to the sons of Israel, saying, ‘On the fifteenth of this seventh month is the Feast of Booths for seven days to the Lord.”
“‘On exactly the fifteenth day of the seventh month, when you have gathered in the crops of the land, you shall celebrate the feast of the Lord for seven days, with a rest on the first day and a rest on the eighth day. 40 Now on the first day you shall take for yourselves the foliage of beautiful trees, palm branches and branches of trees with thick branches and willows of the brook, and you shall rejoice before the Lord your God for seven days. 41 So you shall celebrate it as a feast to the Lord for seven days in the year. It shall be a permanent statute throughout your generations; you shall celebrate it in the seventh month. 42 You shall live in booths for seven days; all the native-born in Israel shall live in booths, 43 so that your generations may know that I had the sons of Israel live in booths when I brought them out from the land of Egypt. I am the Lord your God.’” 44 So Moses declared to the sons of Israel the appointed times of the Lord.”

Verse 42 & 43 spell out exactly why the feast of booths (Sukkot, the Feast of Tabernacles) was to be celebrated.

The LORD calls them HIS FEASTS, His appointments with his chosen people.
True, but there are new celebrations in the New Covenant that take the place of these. The Passover was shown to be fulfilled in Jesus, and He gave us the Lord’s Supper (a condensed Passover) to celebrate “as often as we eat this bread and drink this cup” the salvation that is in Christ.

The New Covenant is more about looking forward to Heaven than it is about looking back to our past.
They are dates to teach his salvation plan which is not completed yet. So Messiah would CERTAINLY not make them obsolete, the whole must be fulfilled.
Jesus’ salvation plan is not complete? I don’t think so! He fully completed His mission to bring salvation to Israel (and to the rest of the nations as well) when He was on Earth 2000 years ago.

You know what a ketubah is, yes? Mine hangs in my bedroom.
2C2C5B17-C34B-4AD3-B3AD-0BDB8B73BCF4.jpeg

For those who do not know, let me explain. A ketubah is a marriage contract signed between (traditionally) two fathers when they agree for their children to wed (today, many are signed by the bride and groom on the wedding day). This contract details what the fathers must give in exchange for the wedding to take place (bride price, or dowry). The moment the ketubah is signed, the two children are legally wed. Now the boy goes to prepare a house for his new bride to live in. And the girl makes herself beautiful for her husband. When the boy is ready, he goes to the girls father’s house and parades her through the streets back to his house where there is a feast celebrating the new couple.

The New Covenant is like a ketubah. John 14:1-3 is wedding talk. He is saying that the Ketubah is about to be signed in His own blood, and He (the Bridegroom) is going to prepare the home for His bride (the believers in Israel, the Church). When He is ready, He will return and take us to His home where the wedding feast is prepared.

The only thing that is lacking in this is for Christ Jesus to return and take the Bride home. Everything else has already been fulfilled.
 
Upvote 0

Bob S

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dec 5, 2015
4,947
2,355
90
Union County, TN
✟834,411.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It has everthing to do with rebutting that he fulfilled everything in the Torah written about him.
How coy, I know that I am not the brightest light, but it doesn't take the brightest light to see that either you didn't take the time to read what I wrote or you are trying to pull the wool over my eyes by writing "everything in Torah" which I never indicated that He did. I wrote that he accomplished everything He came to do. I need not go any further into your response because I see you are not debating sincerely.

 
Upvote 0

Studyman

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 18, 2020
2,483
703
66
Michigan
✟478,001.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
You are correct that taking those verses out of context is dangerous, and false doctrines are created when we do so. However, that was not my intention. My point in referencing that passage, and following it up with the other, was to point out that every single human has sinned. There is no one who is healthy spiritually.
I understand what you are promoting. What I am advocating, is that we understand what Paul is promoting. And it wasn't to make the case that the Spirit of Christ, even after over 14 years, was not able to influence His Body to have a Righteousness that exceeds the righteousness of those unbelieving Pharisees who "profess that they know God; but in works they deny him, being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate."

And your statement "There is no one who is healthy spiritually", is not what Jesus or Paul taught. Nor was it what David taught, in the Psalms that Paul quoted. "5 There were they in great fear: for God is in the generation of the righteous.

And who are the Righteous? Those believers who the Pharisees and Corrupt Levites persecuted and slandered, "whose damnation is just", Yes, do you not believe this? "Ye have shamed the counsel of the poor, because the LORD is his refuge." How can we say that Paul's Refuge wasn't the Lord? And who was persecuting Paul, whose damnation was just? The unbelieving Jews, or the body of Christ? Yes, everyone has sinned, except Jesus. But men have been repenting and turning to God since before Lot followed God with Abraham.

Did Abraham and Noah not repent, and become heathy spiritually? Caleb, Daniel, Meshak? Did these men not eat and Drink from the Rock of Israel? Were these men lost? Was Zacharias Lost? "And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless."

So there are those who were righteous, who were not lost, but had found the way. The Wise men, Simeon, Zacharias, Anna, all of which knew the Christ, the Rock of Israel, when HE came, and worshipped Him just as those members of the Body of Christ in Paul's Time worshipped Him.

So who was Paul and David speaking about when they both said, "For there is no faithfulness in their mouth; their inward part is very wickedness; their throat is an open sepulchre; they flatter with their tongue." Shall we not believe what is written?

Ps. 5: 4 For thou art not a God that hath pleasure in wickedness: neither shall evil dwell with thee. 5 The foolish shall not stand in thy sight: thou hatest all workers of iniquity.

Ps. 14: 4 Have all the workers of iniquity no knowledge? who eat up my people as they eat bread, and call not upon the LORD.

Rom. 3:3For what if some did not believe? shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect?

7 For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner? 8 And not rather, (as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? "whose damnation is just."

Just as Paul had already proven both Jew and Gentile, who didn't believe God in Rom. 2: 3-11. "that they (not we, whose refuge is the Lord)) are all under sin;

So when Jesus says He has come to call the wicked and not the righteous, He is saying He has come for everyone (although there are many who believe, like the Pharisees, that they are healthy and not in need of salvation).

But Zacharias knew, Simeon knew, Anna knew, Caleb knew, Joshua knew, Shadrack knew. Jesus came to save that which was lost. Zacharias was "Righteous before God". The Spirit of Christ was already on Him. He was of the "Generation of the Righteous" the mainstream religions of Paul's time persecuted, at least according to the Scriptures. Paul doesn't contradict any of this in Romans 1-3.

Those who were God’s chosen people in the Old Testament sinned repeatedly. And today, even those who grow up in Christian homes with Christian parents sin and are lost before they repent, turn to Christ, and are baptized to receive forgiveness of their sins and join the Church.

You are making a Judgment of the Faithful in the Law and Prophets, which is a false accusation. Can you show the repeated sins of Abraham? Noah? Caleb, Joshua, David? Daniel? Where is your support that they are all "workers of Iniquity"?

You didn't learn this judgment by studying Brent. You learned this by the influence of other religious voices. Neither God, nor the Prophets, nor Jesus, Paul, Peter, not one of them ever accused the Faithful which existed in the Law and Prophets as a worker of iniquity or repeat sinners. All men have sinned and fall short of the Glory of God, but all men are not "workers of Iniquity".

Here is God's Judgment of some of His Faithful.

2 Kings 18: 1 Now it came to pass in the third year of Hoshea son of Elah king of Israel, that Hezekiah the son of Ahaz king of Judah began to reign. 2 Twenty and five years old was he when he began to reign; and he reigned twenty and nine years in Jerusalem. His mother's name also was Abi, the daughter of Zachariah. 3 And he did that which was right in the sight of the LORD, according to all that David his father did.

4 He removed the high places, and brake the images, and cut down the groves, and brake in pieces the brasen serpent that Moses had made: for unto those days the children of Israel did burn incense to it: and he called it Nehushtan. 5 He trusted in the LORD God of Israel; so that after him was none like him among all the kings of Judah, nor any that were before him. 6 For he clave to the LORD, and departed not from following him, but kept his commandments, which the LORD commanded Moses.

My post doesn't represent anything towards you personally. I simply want to point out what the Scriptures actually say, and to promote the Study of them, apart from the religious influence of the religions of this world God placed us in. After all, as Peter said "Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.


As I said above, my declaration that there is none righteous was not to say that there is no one who is has been made righteous in Christ. Far from it. My point was that every single person, with the notable exception of Jesus, has sinned and was at some point lost.

Yes, that is your point. But it wasn't Paul's point in Romans 1-3.


Every single person is in need of salvation. There are some today who, like the Pharisees, believe that they are righteous in themselves and not in need of a savior; they believe they are healthy. My point was that we are all in need of a savior, and without Jesus we are lost.

No argument here. Noah, Abraham, Caleb, David, Zacharias, Simeon, Anna, Peter, Paul all knew the Rock of Israel was the only way. What I am pointing out is what Paul was saying in Roman's 3. And how what he said has been twisted and used to justify sin, falsely accuse the Faithful "whose refuge is the Lord", for centuries.

I am hoping to share this perspective of a man who has been separated from this world's religious philosophies for 30 years. Not that I am anyone, I'm a nobody to be sure, but simply want men to consider what Scri[ptutres actually say and not the doctrines and traditions of this world God placed us in.
You are correct, I did not go on to say that we can find salvation through Christ, and so my words could be taken to mean that man is hopeless because there is no salvation. Heaven forbid! Forgive me for that.

The Jesus of the Bible said;

John 8: 31 Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; 32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

What is that one thing that the "Truth" makes a man free from? Is this one thing not "deception"? And didn't our Savior warn us regarding this very thing?

Matt. 24: 4 And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you. 5 For many shall come in my name, saying, I (Jesus) am Christ; and shall deceive many.

We are told to "Prove ALL things" because of this, Yes?

So you and I, since our Youth, have been taught by this world's religions, that Paul is teaching in Romans 3, that "ALL" men ever, Faithful, unfaithful, doesn't matter, "Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips: Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness:"

This teaching is a lie. This is not what the Spirit of Christ is teaching through David or Paul. I know this from Study, apart from the influences of the religions of this world God placed me in. This popular false teaching is only one of many, many winds of doctrine you and I have been influenced by.

Understanding and accepting this truth, will expose other falsehoods being taught, as Jesus Prophesied. My hope is that you would consider this one doctrine, do the study on your own, and be freed from this "philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ."
 
Upvote 0

Studyman

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 18, 2020
2,483
703
66
Michigan
✟478,001.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
And circumcision, and maintaining the kosher diet, and continuing the annual pilgrimages to Jerusalem, and all the rest of the Old Covenant requirements.

And loving your neighbor, and not sneaking around on your wife, and not stealing. How convenient to create a religion in which you can judge God and His Laws, some as unworthy of your honor and respect, and some are worthy of your honor and respect. The Pharisees and the Corrupt Levite Priests did the same exact thing.

Mal. 2: 8 But ye are departed out of the way; ye have caused many to stumble at the law; ye have corrupted the covenant of Levi, saith the LORD of hosts. 9 Therefore have I also made you contemptible and base before all the people, according as ye have not kept my ways, but have been partial in the law.

It's so sad you can't believe Paul's words.

1 Cor. 9: 9 For it is written in the law of Moses, (That you preach is obsolete, as it was the old covenant) Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen? 10 Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope.

Doth God care about loose skin on a penis? Or saith He this Law for "our own sakes"?

A little leaven leavens the whole lump Brent. If the least of God's Commandments regarding an Oxen was written for Paul over 14 years after the resurrection of Christ, then how foolish is it to believe the religions of this world regarding their preaching of circumcision.

No, the Gospel of Christ is NOT the Law and Prophets. The Law and Prophets point to the Gospel of Christ, but the Gospel supersedes the Law.

This may be true in the RCC religion, or yours. But according to Paul's Own words the Gospel of Christ was the Law and prophets the Pharisees had corrupted and polluted.

Rom. 1: 16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek. (Noah, Abraham, Caleb, Joshua, Daniel, Shadrack, Zacharias, Simeon, Anna "Everyone who Believeth".

Paul told Timothy the same thing.

2 Tim. 3: 15 And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. The only Scriptures they had, was the Same Scriptures Paul speaks to in Romans 1. Look for yourself. Or are you preaching the New Testament was written for Timothy to read when he was a child?

Rom. 1:17 For therein (Within the Gospel of Christ) is the righteousness of God revealed from faith (of Abel) to faith (of Malichi) : as it is written, The just shall live by faith.

Where is this written Brent? Is it not written in the Law and Prophets? Hab. 2:4? Where is the righteousness of God that Jesus walked in revealed? Where do we even find the Righteousness that Exceeds the righteousness of the Pharisees? How did Paul and the Body of Christ become "Servants of God's Righteousness" in Rom. 6?

18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;

Where is the only place on the Planet, where God's Wrath against unrighteousness and ungodliness of men is found? The Truth??? The Law and Prophets that both Jesus and Paul taught from exclusively.

19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.

The Gospel of Christ was shown to Israel, but it didn't benefit them not being mixed with Belief.

Heb. 4: 2 For unto us was the gospel preached, as well as unto them: but the word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them that heard it.

The Gospel of Christ tells us this very thing, for those who Believe.

Duet. 32: 18 Of the Rock (And that Rock was Christ) that begat thee thou art unmindful, and hast forgotten God that formed thee.

19 And when the LORD saw it, he abhorred them, because of the provoking of his sons, and of his daughters. (Whose Refuge was the Lord)

20 And he said, I will hide my face from them, I will see what their end shall be: for they are a very froward generation, children in whom is no faith.

Paul is certainly tells the Body of Christ that the Gospel of Christ in the Law and Prophets. It's right there in front of your eyes, all that lacks is Belief.

I'll address the rest of post later.
 
Upvote 0

sparow

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2014
2,737
452
86
✟570,419.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
All good up to here.

The Law was given at Me Sinai and is likened to the slave woman mother of slaves that was cast out and proclaimed not an heir with the free sin (the New Covenant).

King David and Solomon? Great kings indeed, but Jesus is the King of Kings. Unless you consider that Jesus give kingship to David and Solomon, and so was the King of those kings. So if that is your perspective then you are correct.

Wrong. The kingdom of Israel is not the same as the Kingdom of God. Israel is a physical, Earthly kingdom. But the Kingdom of God is a spiritual, Heavenly kingdom.

Not sure what you mean by this.



You choose to break the plan of salvation up into little bits, I see the plan as homogeneous. God is creating with a linear algorithm, beginning with Adam and ending up with the kingdom of God on earth.


The kingdom of God in heaven does not have a physical existence; when it comes to earth it will have a physical existence; Revelation gives the dimensions of the New Jerusalem (a fifty mile cube I think). I am inclined to see (metaphorically) the kingdom of God in heaven as similar to pure mathematics. Consider the Mathematical plane with x and y coordinates; the plane does not really exist except as mental aid to the human brain; on this plane we can draw a straight line; a straight line has only one dimension and that is length, if one assumes it exists then it is invisible; a straight line is shortest distance between two points; a point has x, y coordinates on the plane, but a point has no dimensions, no length, no breadth, and no depth; when we add the z coordinate we have a mathematical space; when we add the fourth coordinate t we have motion in the space; when we add a second t and put the former x,y,z,t system in motion with in a larger x,y,z,t system and we have multiple universes. I am not sure that a mathematician would agree with this.


I see God creating a physical existence for the Kingdom of God; among other things; and taking seven thousand years to do it.


Confirming the covenant; I am aware confirming means something different to me that to others. To me the covenant (poor choice of word), is a contract between two parties and involves plans and promises and commitments; confirming is the completion of the plan, fulfillment of the promises and the commitments in practice.
 
Upvote 0

Doug Brents

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2021
1,763
362
52
Atlanta, GA
✟13,253.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I understand what you are promoting. What I am advocating, is that we understand what Paul is promoting. And it wasn't to make the case that the Spirit of Christ, even after over 14 years, was not able to influence His Body to have a Righteousness that exceeds the righteousness of those unbelieving Pharisees who "profess that they know God; but in works they deny him, being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate."

And your statement "There is no one who is healthy spiritually", is not what Jesus or Paul taught. Nor was it what David taught, in the Psalms that Paul quoted. "5 There were they in great fear: for God is in the generation of the righteous.

And who are the Righteous? Those believers who the Pharisees and Corrupt Levites persecuted and slandered, "whose damnation is just", Yes, do you not believe this? "Ye have shamed the counsel of the poor, because the LORD is his refuge." How can we say that Paul's Refuge wasn't the Lord? And who was persecuting Paul, whose damnation was just? The unbelieving Jews, or the body of Christ? Yes, everyone has sinned, except Jesus. But men have been repenting and turning to God since before Lot followed God with Abraham.

Did Abraham and Noah not repent, and become heathy spiritually? Caleb, Daniel, Meshak? Did these men not eat and Drink from the Rock of Israel? Were these men lost? Was Zacharias Lost? "And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless."

So there are those who were righteous, who were not lost, but had found the way. The Wise men, Simeon, Zacharias, Anna, all of which knew the Christ, the Rock of Israel, when HE came, and worshipped Him just as those members of the Body of Christ in Paul's Time worshipped Him.

So who was Paul and David speaking about when they both said, "For there is no faithfulness in their mouth; their inward part is very wickedness; their throat is an open sepulchre; they flatter with their tongue." Shall we not believe what is written?

Ps. 5: 4 For thou art not a God that hath pleasure in wickedness: neither shall evil dwell with thee. 5 The foolish shall not stand in thy sight: thou hatest all workers of iniquity.

Ps. 14: 4 Have all the workers of iniquity no knowledge? who eat up my people as they eat bread, and call not upon the LORD.

Rom. 3:3For what if some did not believe? shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect?

7 For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner? 8 And not rather, (as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? "whose damnation is just."

Just as Paul had already proven both Jew and Gentile, who didn't believe God in Rom. 2: 3-11. "that they (not we, whose refuge is the Lord)) are all under sin;
Yes, there have been many people throughout Scripture that have been said to be righteous. And you alluded to the answer to this next question in you thesis above: who made them righteous? They were not righteous in themselves, because every person has sinned and fallen short, putting them in the position that they were unworthy of God and could not save themselves. So because they were seeking God, and making the effort to obey Him, God made them righteous.

You are making a Judgment of the Faithful in the Law and Prophets, which is a false accusation. Can you show the repeated sins of Abraham? Noah? Caleb, Joshua, David? Daniel? Where is your support that they are all "workers of Iniquity"?
Abraham lied. David was an adulterer and a murderer. Of the others I cannot remember a passage that depicts a particular sin, but even Moses put himself in God’s place when he asked the Israelites, “Shall we provide water out of this rock?” And he struck the rock instead of speaking to it as God commanded. Were they continual, habitual, incessant sinners? No. But did they sin at least once in their lives? Yes (Rom 3:21-26)
You didn't learn this judgment by studying Brent. You learned this by the influence of other religious voices. Neither God, nor the Prophets, nor Jesus, Paul, Peter, not one of them ever accused the Faithful which existed in the Law and Prophets as a worker of iniquity or repeat sinners. All men have sinned and fall short of the Glory of God, but all men are not "workers of Iniquity".
James 2:10-11 - “For whoever keeps the whole Law, yet stumbles in one point, has become guilty of all. 11 For He who said, “Do not commit adultery,” also said, “Do not murder.” Now if you do not commit adultery, but do murder, you have become a violator of the Law.”
Yes, this doctrine does come from Scripture. A violator of the Law deserves punishment by God, and we ALL have violated the Law of God. Yet God provides mercy to those who seek Him.

Absolutely right, and as I have already said, I do not adhere to any religion of this world, or any of the doctrines that are contrary to the Word of God, of which there are many. I adhere only to the Word of God. And as I have shown above, the doctrine that ALL men are sinners comes directly from Scripture. And so ALL men are in need of a savior: Jesus Christ the Lord.
Yes, that is your point. But it wasn't Paul's point in Romans 1-3.
That os exactly Paul’s point as summed up in Rom 3:23.
No argument here. Noah, Abraham, Caleb, David, Zacharias, Simeon, Anna, Peter, Paul all knew the Rock of Israel was the only way. What I am pointing out is what Paul was saying in Roman's 3. And how what he said has been twisted and used to justify sin, falsely accuse the Faithful "whose refuge is the Lord", for centuries.
There is no justification for sin. Especially in Rom 1-3. Paul is making the case there that there is no one who is righteous before God of their own doing. Everyone you are talking about here sinned, just as I have, but was declared righteous by God, just as I have been.

I am hoping to share this perspective of a man who has been separated from this world's religious philosophies for 30 years. Not that I am anyone, I'm a nobody to be sure, but simply want men to consider what Scriptutres actually say and not the doctrines and traditions of this world God placed us in.
I agree wholeheartedly. But we can’t throw out the righteous doctrines with the evil ones. Yes, there are many righteous mentioned in Scripture, but NONE of them got that way on their own.

The Jesus of the Bible said;

John 8: 31 Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; 32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

What is that one thing that the "Truth" makes a man free from? Is this one thing not "deception"?
We are not free from just one thing. But you are correct: if we know the truth we will be free from deception.
And didn't our Savior warn us regarding this very thing?

Matt. 24: 4 And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you. 5 For many shall come in my name, saying, I (Jesus) am Christ; and shall deceive many.

We are told to "Prove ALL things" because of this, Yes?

So you and I, since our Youth, have been taught by this world's religions,
No. Not by the worlds religions, but by the Scripture itself.
You are correct that this passage applies to those who are habitually and consistently seeking the flesh.

This teaching is a lie. This is not what the Spirit of Christ is teaching through David or Paul. I know this from Study, apart from the influences of the religions of this world God placed me in. This popular false teaching is only one of many, many winds of doctrine you and I have been influenced by.
I know what you are saying, but take a step back for a moment and let’s look at the reasoning behind this doctrine.
Paul, throughout the letter we call Romans makes a case for our need for Jesus. His case basically boils down to this outline.

1: all have sinned
2. there is no difference between someone who sins repeatedly and someone who only sins once in their entire life
3: all sinners are in need of a savior
4: Jesus came to save everyone
5. But only those who seek Him will find Him and be made righteous by Him.
 
Upvote 0

Doug Brents

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2021
1,763
362
52
Atlanta, GA
✟13,253.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I am done with this part of this conversation. I believe that God commanded physical actions in regards to circumcision. You, apparently, believe He was only talking about a spiritual work that He alone did. So sad for you that you cannot read what God wrote in His Word and understand it.

This may be true in the RCC religion, or yours. But according to Paul's Own words the Gospel of Christ was the Law and prophets the Pharisees had corrupted and polluted.

Rom. 1: 16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek. (Noah, Abraham, Caleb, Joshua, Daniel, Shadrack, Zacharias, Simeon, Anna "Everyone who Believeth".
No, Noah, Abraham, Caleb, Joshua, Daniel, Shadrack, Zacharias, Simeon, and Anna all lived and died under the Old Covenant before the Gospel of Jesus came to be. The Old Covenant points to the Gospel, but it is not the Gospel.

Paul told Timothy the same thing.

2 Tim. 3: 15 And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. The only Scriptures they had, was the Same Scriptures Paul speaks to in Romans 1. Look for yourself. Or are you preaching the New Testament was written for Timothy to read when he was a child?
Indeed, as I just said, the Old Covenant points toward the Gospel of Jesus. And the Old Covenant can make you wise so that you understand the Gospel which is through faith in Jesus, not faith in the Law.

Again, you add words to Scripture to impart your own meaning. The green in your quote above is not in Scripture. And that is not even implied. Yes, the Gospel of Christ is the power of righteousness, through faith.

Where is this written Brent?

Where is the only place on the Planet, where God's Wrath against unrighteousness and ungodliness of men is found? The Truth??? The Law and Prophets that both Jesus and Paul taught from exclusively.
Yes, Jesus taught exclusively from the Old Law, becaus that was all there was. But Paul, most likely, taught from the Gospel of Matthew as well during his missionary journeys. The “truth” lies in ALL Scripture, and I believe that the Bible (Genesis all the way through Revelation) is Scripture; inspired by God, and perfect (infallible) in every word.

19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.

The Gospel of Christ was shown to Israel, but it didn't benefit them not being mixed with Belief.
You say belief here, but the verse below says faith. Faith and belief are not the same thing. But that is for another thread maybe.
All you are doing is pointing out what I said: the Old Covenant points towards Christ. But it is not the Gospel. The Gospel of Christ is that God became a man, lived a perfect, sinless life, died a horrible death that we deserve, was resurrected by the Holy Spirit, and promises that if we believe in and obey Him, He will exchange our sinfulness with His sinlessness, and make us heirs with Him of Heaven. That is the Gospel: that is the good news. That is pointed towards from Genesis to Malachi, but Jesus was not a man during any of those books, so the Gospel had not yet begun.
 
Upvote 0

Doug Brents

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2021
1,763
362
52
Atlanta, GA
✟13,253.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You choose to break the plan of salvation up into little bits, I see the plan as homogeneous. God is creating with a linear algorithm, beginning with Adam and ending up with the kingdom of God on earth.
Nope. I see only one plan from the beginning, but God revealed it to us in increments.
The kingdom of God in heaven does not have a physical existence; when it comes to earth it will have a physical existence; Revelation gives the dimensions of the New Jerusalem (a fifty mile cube I think). I am inclined to see (metaphorically) the kingdom of God in heaven as similar to pure mathematics. Consider the Mathematical plane with x and y coordinates; the plane does not really exist except as mental aid to the human brain; on this plane we can draw a straight line; a straight line has only one dimension and that is length, if one assumes it exists then it is invisible; a straight line is shortest distance between two points; a point has x, y coordinates on the plane, but a point has no dimensions, no length, no breadth, and no depth; when we add the z coordinate we have a mathematical space; when we add the fourth coordinate t we have motion in the space; when we add a second t and put the former x,y,z,t system in motion with in a larger x,y,z,t system and we have multiple universes. I am not sure that a mathematician would agree with this.
I am not sure where you were going with this, but let me borrow a piece of it. Consider Adam. He knew God as a friend, but he only had one law and he broke it. He could not conceive of the laws of Moses, but received his instruction directly from God. He was a one dimensional being.

Then you have Moses who received the Law. He spoke to God, but he also received very strict rules to follow and to pass on to the people. He was a two dimensional being. He could understand the one dimensional, but could also see the larger world of the new Law he had received.

Now you come to the Apostles. They had the Law, but Jesus stretched them to a new freedom in the Gospel. They, and we, are three dimensional. We can understand everything the one and two dimensional people could, but they could not even comprehend our freedom in Christ today.

And we cannot comprehend the joy and celebration that will occur in Heaven when we become four dimensional beings like God (sorry if that takes the analogy too far).

I see God creating a physical existence for the Kingdom of God; among other things; and taking seven thousand years to do it.
By my count, only 5900 years or so since creation, but I won’t quibble over a thousand years. At least you wasn’t billions of years off.
Confirming the covenant; I am aware confirming means something different to me that to others. To me the covenant (poor choice of word), is a contract between two parties and involves plans and promises and commitments; confirming is the completion of the plan, fulfillment of the promises and the commitments in practice.
Kind of.
God made a covenant with Abraham, and then He confirmed that covenant (the one He made with Abraham) with Isaac, and then He confirmed it again with Jacob. This confirming is renewing, yes. But the completion of the contractual agreements of the covenant is to fulfill the covenant. To finish it. To bring it to a conclusion because all the clauses have been satisfied.
 
Upvote 0

sparow

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2014
2,737
452
86
✟570,419.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Nope. I see only one plan from the beginning, but God revealed it to us in increments.

I am not sure where you were going with this, but let me borrow a piece of it. Consider Adam. He knew God as a friend, but he only had one law and he broke it. He could not conceive of the laws of Moses, but received his instruction directly from God. He was a one dimensional being.

Then you have Moses who received the Law. He spoke to God, but he also received very strict rules to follow and to pass on to the people. He was a two dimensional being. He could understand the one dimensional, but could also see the larger world of the new Law he had received.

Now you come to the Apostles. They had the Law, but Jesus stretched them to a new freedom in the Gospel. They, and we, are three dimensional. We can understand everything the one and two dimensional people could, but they could not even comprehend our freedom in Christ today.

And we cannot comprehend the joy and celebration that will occur in Heaven when we become four dimensional beings like God (sorry if that takes the analogy too far).


By my count, only 5900 years or so since creation, but I won’t quibble over a thousand years. At least you wasn’t billions of years off.

Kind of.
God made a covenant with Abraham, and then He confirmed that covenant (the one He made with Abraham) with Isaac, and then He confirmed it again with Jacob. This confirming is renewing, yes. But the completion of the contractual agreements of the covenant is to fulfill the covenant. To finish it. To bring it to a conclusion because all the clauses have been satisfied.

I fear what you call free Jesus calls Lawlessness. According to the Jewish calendar the year 6000 is about 230 years away; the second resurrection is at the start of the eighth thousand year; the Sabbath goes on indefinitely.
 
Upvote 0

Doug Brents

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2021
1,763
362
52
Atlanta, GA
✟13,253.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I fear what you call free Jesus calls Lawlessness. According to the Jewish calendar the year 6000 is about 230 years away; the second resurrection is at the start of the eighth thousand year; the Sabbath goes on indefinitely.
Wow, I would love to know where you got the bolded part of your statement.
 
Upvote 0

Lulav

Y'shua is His Name
Aug 24, 2007
34,149
7,245
✟509,998.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
How coy, I know that I am not the brightest light, but it doesn't take the brightest light to see that either you didn't take the time to read what I wrote or you are trying to pull the wool over my eyes by writing "everything in Torah" which I never indicated that He did. I wrote that he accomplished everything He came to do. I need not go any further into your response because I see you are not debating sincerely.
Not being coy Bob, just confused you with the OP and I apologize for that. He is the one who said:

I am not teaching anyone to "break the commandments". I am saying, as Scripture says, that the Old Covenant was completely fulfilled and accomplished by Jesus on the cross. We are no longer subject to ANY of the OT commands, but are now subject to the NEW Covenant and the commands in it.

I ask that you do not cast aspersions my way as I don't try to 'pull the wool over anyone's eyes' or not debate sincerely. I am human and with all the posts on here and in my thread it became confusing.
 
Upvote 0

Lulav

Y'shua is His Name
Aug 24, 2007
34,149
7,245
✟509,998.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
No disrespect or insult is offered or intended to the Lord God. But these days are no longer Law. They are traditions that are still kept, but they are no longer commands, because they are all part of the Old Covenant that has been made obsolete in Christ!
So if they were already fulfilled in Messiah why after he left were they keeping Shavuot?

It was only ten days after he left, rose to heaven so if he had taught them in those 40 days he was with them after the resurrection that he had fulfilled everything at the cross then why keep this Feasts of the LORD?
 
Upvote 0

Doug Brents

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2021
1,763
362
52
Atlanta, GA
✟13,253.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So if they were already fulfilled in Messiah why after he left were they keeping Shavuot?

It was only ten days after he left, rose to heaven so if he had taught them in those 40 days he was with them after the resurrection that he had fulfilled everything at the cross then why keep this Feasts of the LORD?
The feasts were tradition at that point, not law. There is nothing wrong with keeping a tradition (as long as the tradition is not taught as a law of God as the Pharisees did with their “hedge around the Law).

And there is no indication that the Apostles were keeping Shavuot. It just says that when Shavuot had come, they were gathered together (Acts 2:1), as they had been constantly for those 10 days as Jesus told them, talking about Christ and anticipating His return.
 
Upvote 0

Lulav

Y'shua is His Name
Aug 24, 2007
34,149
7,245
✟509,998.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
I am very glad to hear of another one of my Jewish brothers is also a brother in Christ. I am very glad to hear that.

Stop right there.
I am not your Jewish brother.

You know what a ketubah is, yes? Mine hangs in my bedroom.
As a witness.
A ketubah is a marriage contract
As is the Covenant from Mt Sinai, It contains the terms made by the Father to his people which said upon hearing them 'All you have said we will do' kinda like 'I take you YHVH to be my lawfully wedded God and we will be your bride (people).
The New Covenant is like a ketubah. John 14:1-3 is wedding talk. He is saying that the Ketubah is about to be signed in His own blood, and He (the Bridegroom) is going to prepare the home for His bride (the believers in Israel, the Church). When He is ready, He will return and take us to His home where the wedding feast is prepared.

The only thing that is lacking in this is for Christ Jesus to return and take the Bride home. Everything else has already been fulfilled.
God made a covenant with Abraham, and then He confirmed that covenant (the one He made with Abraham) with Isaac, and then He confirmed it again with Jacob. This confirming is renewing, yes. But the completion of the contractual agreements of the covenant is to fulfill the covenant. To finish it. To bring it to a conclusion because all the clauses have been satisfied.
So does that go for a human to human ketubah as well? The agreement on the ketubahs purpose is to finish it, to bring it to a conclusion?
 
Upvote 0

Doug Brents

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2021
1,763
362
52
Atlanta, GA
✟13,253.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I am not your Jewish brother.
No? I am also an heir of Abraham.
As is the Covenant from Mt Sinai, It contains the terms made by the Father to his people which said upon hearing them 'All you have said we will do' kinda like 'I take you YHVH to be my lawfully wedded God and we will be your bride (people).
Very true, but Israel went whoring among the gods of the nations they failed to drive out of Cannon. The Old Covenant was made void by their unfaithfulness, just as God said unfaithfulness was the only reason for divorce. So God made a New Covenant with those who will honor Him, and be His bride.

So does that go for a human to human ketubah as well? The agreement on the ketubahs purpose is to finish it, to bring it to a conclusion?
The Ketubah is the agreement between the fathers of the children getting married. It does not constitute the agreement between the children and God. The ketubah is fulfilled when the children come together on their wedding night, where God makes the two one.

The New Covenant (ketubah) will not be fulfilled until Jesus comes back to get His bride and take us to Heaven with Him.
 
Upvote 0

sparow

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2014
2,737
452
86
✟570,419.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Wow, I would love to know where you got the bolded part of your statement.

I can see that some would be confused; I think this comes about because translator applying English grammar to Greek encoded Hebrew; Rev 20:4 talks about people who worshiped not the beast and received not the mark, and they lived and reigned with Christ, this a resurrection, clearly from the verse these were dead and now live; Rev 20:5, The rest of the dead lived not for a thousand years. This is a second resurrection and all the dead are alive, some prepared for the second death. The millennium, the thousand years of desolation, the thousand years when Satan is bound, the thousand years when the first resurrection judges the second resurrection, is the seventh thousand year since creation. The second resurrection happens after the millennium which is the eighth thousand year from Adam.
 
Upvote 0

Doug Brents

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2021
1,763
362
52
Atlanta, GA
✟13,253.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I can see that some would be confused; I think this comes about because translator applying English grammar to Greek encoded Hebrew; Rev 20:4 talks about people who worshiped not the beast and received not the mark, and they lived and reigned with Christ, this a resurrection, clearly from the verse these were dead and now live; Rev 20:5, The rest of the dead lived not for a thousand years. This is a second resurrection and all the dead are alive, some prepared for the second death. The millennium, the thousand years of desolation, the thousand years when Satan is bound, the thousand years when the first resurrection judges the second resurrection, is the seventh thousand year since creation. The second resurrection happens after the millennium which is the eighth thousand year from Adam.
I see everything you are talking about, right up to the seventh thousand years since creation and the eighth thousand years.

The thousand year reign occurs after the Second Coming, and the Earth, the stars, and all of creation will be destroyed during the Second Coming (2 Pet 3:10). Everything that follows is purely spiritual in nature (wedding feast, war with Satan, Satan cast into Hell with all his angels and all the lost souls), then the New Earth will be created.

But there is nothing there that even hints at the 7th or 8th millennium.
 
Upvote 0