When did humans first start to speak? How language evolved in Africa

[Ligurian]

What?

Haven't you ever been called a racist because you don't want to pretend that all people are of one race?
I keep asking, Then where did the three blood types come from, but nobody seems to know.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Haven't you ever been called a racist because you don't want to pretend that all people are of one race?

No, I haven't. (This might just be you.)

I keep asking, Then where did the three blood types come from, but nobody seems to know.

The ABO blood type system has deep origins in our history and is found among all of the apes. It's not even limited to one *species*.

 

[dlamberth]

Haven't you ever been called a racist because you don't want to pretend that all people are of one race?

The Human Race.
All, an activity of God.

 

[Ligurian]

But some say that America is still a British Colony.
And others say that America is being run by a DC Corporation.

Do some of the British say that as well?

The Justice League of America???

From a browser search:

"The United States is still a British colony - All the Treaty did was remove the United States as a liability and obligation of the king. He no longer had to ship material and money to support his subjects and colonies. At the same time he retained financial subjection through debt owed after the Treaty, which is still being created today; millions of dollars a day."
https://spoonfedtruth.ucoz.com/PDFs/The_United_States_is_still_a_British_Colony.pdf

This PDF isn't from some guy telling you what he thinks... he provides references for WHY he thinks what he does.


"28 U.S. Code § 3002 – Definitions
As used in this chapter:
(15) “United States” means—

(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States."
...
"I think Keating may explain here that UNITED STATES is similar to the British East Indies Company, which was a corporation that had an army."

‘United States’ is a Federal corporation, says U.S. Code, Title 28 – Educated in Law

www.educatedinlaw.org

______________________
"You take the blue pill... the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe.
You take the red pill... you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes."--The Matrix

 

[Ligurian]

No, I haven't. (This might just be you.)

Yup, and they keep doing it because I don't rat them out.

 

[Ligurian]

The Human Race.
All, an activity of God.

Why does the Jewish Bible say "the generations of Adam"?
Weren't there pre-Adamites living in other places, and totally unknown to the Jews?
When the ancients said the whole world, did they mean the Earth? Or only the inhabited world they knew about?

 

[dlamberth]

Why does the Jewish Bible say "the generations of Adam"?

Don't know.

Weren't there pre-Adamites living in other places, and totally unknown to the Jews?

There were Human Beings going back at least 200,000 years from what I understand. Judaism in human history is relatively new.

When the ancients said the whole world, did they mean the Earth? Or only the inhabited world they knew about?

I don't know. But I'd think that depending upon the culture different meanings would arise. As an example using Native American's, they saw/experienced things like trees, plants and everything around them and I suspect even the whole world as a verb where we see everything as a noun.

 

[AV1611VET]

From a browser search:

"The United States is still a British colony -

The British lost us when we won the War of 1812.

 

[Hans Blaster]

From a browser search:

"The United States is still a British colony - All the Treaty did was remove the United States as a liability and obligation of the king. He no longer had to ship material and money to support his subjects and colonies. At the same time he retained financial subjection through debt owed after the Treaty, which is still being created today; millions of dollars a day."
https://spoonfedtruth.ucoz.com/PDFs/The_United_States_is_still_a_British_Colony.pdf

This PDF isn't from some guy telling you what he thinks... he provides references for WHY he thinks what he does.

An insane PDF. Looks like sovereign citizen-type nonsense. LOL.

"28 U.S. Code § 3002 – Definitions
As used in this chapter:
(15) “United States” means—

(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States."
...
"I think Keating may explain here that UNITED STATES is similar to the British East Indies Company, which was a corporation that had an army."

‘United States’ is a Federal corporation, says U.S. Code, Title 28 – Educated in Law

www.educatedinlaw.org

______________________

That section of the US code is definitions:

The previous item (14) defines:

(14)
“State” means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas, or any territory or possession of the United States.

Does that mine the District of Columbia is now a state? (No, it doesn't. It means that the word "state" is used in this chapter of the code to also include other non-state sub-national divisions so you don't have to write "States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas, or any territory or possession of the United States." every time they are speaking of all those entities.)

The next item (16) defines:

(16)
“United States marshal” means a United States marshal, a deputy marshal, or an official of the United States Marshals Service designated under section 564.

The whole section is a bunch of definitions that make it easier to write and read the legal code.

Now as for (15) defining "United States": A federal corporation is a corporation owened by the US government, things like the USPS, or Amtrak, etc.

The "chapter" in question is this one:

28 U.S. Code Chapter 176 - FEDERAL DEBT COLLECTION PROCEDURE​

It has a very specific application.

"You take the blue pill... the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe.
You take the red pill... you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes."--The Matrix

Oh great, a redpilled ...

 

[Ligurian]

From a browser search:

"The United States is still a British colony - All the Treaty did was remove the United States as a liability and obligation of the king. He no longer had to ship material and money to support his subjects and colonies. At the same time he retained financial subjection through debt owed after the Treaty, which is still being created today; millions of dollars a day."
https://spoonfedtruth.ucoz.com/PDFs/The_United_States_is_still_a_British_Colony.pdf

This PDF isn't from some guy telling you what he thinks... he provides references for WHY he thinks what he does.


"28 U.S. Code § 3002 – Definitions
As used in this chapter:
(15) “United States” means—

(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States."
...
"I think Keating may explain here that UNITED STATES is similar to the British East Indies Company, which was a corporation that had an army."

‘United States’ is a Federal corporation, says U.S. Code, Title 28 – Educated in Law

www.educatedinlaw.org

______________________
"You take the blue pill... the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe.
You take the red pill... you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes."--The Matrix

An insane PDF. Looks like sovereign citizen-type nonsense. LOL.


That section of the US code is definitions:

The previous item (14) defines:

(14)
“State” means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas, or any territory or possession of the United States.

Does that mine the District of Columbia is now a state? (No, it doesn't. It means that the word "state" is used in this chapter of the code to also include other non-state sub-national divisions so you don't have to write "States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas, or any territory or possession of the United States." every time they are speaking of all those entities.)

The next item (16) defines:

(16)
“United States marshal” means a United States marshal, a deputy marshal, or an official of the United States Marshals Service designated under section 564.

The whole section is a bunch of definitions that make it easier to write and read the legal code.

Now as for (15) defining "United States": A federal corporation is a corporation owened by the US government, things like the USPS, or Amtrak, etc.

The "chapter" in question is this one:

28 U.S. Code Chapter 176 - FEDERAL DEBT COLLECTION PROCEDURE​

It has a very specific application.


Oh great, a redpilled ...

Nope, to the first line of your post... because:

"You are not a citizen of the corporate or organic State if you want to be free. You cannot claim it is your constitution and remain free. You cannot claim representatives in the legislatures and remain free." ​

The Beginning of the Lie: The Secret Treaty of Verona 1213

Once upon a time before the year 1066 the people of England held Allodial title to their land. Not even the king could take the land for not paying a tithe. William the Conquer came in 1066 and sto…

eraoflight.com

If you read Elements of Ecclesiastical Law, Vol. I, by S. B. Smith, and American Law and Procedure, Vol. 13, Jurisprudence and Legal Institutions, by James DeWitt Andrews... you can find out about The Corporation.


The Matrix is entirely lame by comparison, if the movie's not actually a shill... which I'm assuming it is.
By controlling both sides of the narrative, so to speak... it's bubble-gum for the mind.

_____________________
If you label other people, then you can't complain when they do it to you.
Some people live to get even, if they're not about winning the game.
Me, I'm a realist: the only way to win the game is to die well.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Nope, to the first line of your post... because:

"You are not a citizen of the corporate or organic State if you want to be free. You cannot claim it is your constitution and remain free. You cannot claim representatives in the legislatures and remain free." ​

The Beginning of the Lie: The Secret Treaty of Verona 1213

Once upon a time before the year 1066 the people of England held Allodial title to their land. Not even the king could take the land for not paying a tithe. William the Conquer came in 1066 and sto…

eraoflight.com

that's quite a claim. Not one that gets made by anyone in the mainstream of law, government, political science, etc.

If you read Elements of Ecclesiastical Law, Vol. I, by S. B. Smith, and American Law and Procedure, Vol. 13, Jurisprudence and Legal Institutions, by James DeWitt Andrews... you can find out about The Corporation.

We're talking about the US, not a church. Eccleisatical law is irrelevant.

The Matrix is entirely lame by comparison, if the movie's not actually a shill... which I'm assuming it is.
By controlling both sides of the narrative, so to speak... it's bubble-gum for the mind.

This ain't a movie.

_____________________
If you label other people, then you can't complain when they do it to you.
Some people live to get even, if they're not about winning the game.
Me, I'm a realist: the only way to win the game is to die well.

I didn't lable anyone. I labled a document. That document was nuts. What motivates you to push these odd ideas?

 

[Ligurian]

Nope, to the first line of your post... because:

"You are not a citizen of the corporate or organic State if you want to be free. You cannot claim it is your constitution and remain free. You cannot claim representatives in the legislatures and remain free." ​

The Beginning of the Lie: The Secret Treaty of Verona 1213

Once upon a time before the year 1066 the people of England held Allodial title to their land. Not even the king could take the land for not paying a tithe. William the Conquer came in 1066 and sto…

eraoflight.com

If you read Elements of Ecclesiastical Law, Vol. I, by S. B. Smith, and American Law and Procedure, Vol. 13, Jurisprudence and Legal Institutions, by James DeWitt Andrews... you can find out about The Corporation.

_____________________
If you label other people, then you can't complain when they do it to you.
Some people live to get even, if they're not about winning the game.
Me, I'm a realist: the only way to win the game is to die well.

that's quite a claim. Not one that gets made by anyone in the mainstream of law, government, political science, etc.

Mainstream being the operative term there. It's against their best interests that you should know anything about it.
Executive Order 13037 calls people its "human capital". Some websites even claim that SSNs are traded on the Stock Market.

Reminds me of Feel Like a Number by Bob Seger... but it's a whole lot worse than that.

We're talking about the US, not a church. Eccleisatical law is irrelevant.

"From William I, 1066, to King John, 1199, England was in dire straits. It was bankrupt.
The King invoked the Law of Mortmain, the dead man’s hand, so people couldn’t pass their land on to the church or anyone else without the King’s permission. Without Mortmain the King would lose the land he controlled. The Vatican didn’t like that because the King owed a lot of pounds to the Vatican.
(1). King John refused to accept The Vatican’s representative, Stephen Langton, whom Pope Innocent III installed to rule England
(2) In 1208 England was placed under Papal interdict. (Interdict means a prohibition.)
King John was excommunicated and in trying to regain his stature he groveled before the Pope and returned the title to his kingdoms of England and Ireland to the Pope as vassals, and swore submission and loyalty to him.
... On October 3, 1213, by treaty, King John ratified his surrender of his kingdoms to the Pope"

The Beginning of the Lie: The Secret Treaty of Verona 1213

Once upon a time before the year 1066 the people of England held Allodial title to their land. Not even the king could take the land for not paying a tithe. William the Conquer came in 1066 and sto…

eraoflight.com

It's definitely Ecclesiastical Law.
The Treaty of 1213 aka The Treaty of Verona is all over the web... and just begging to be read.

I didn't lable anyone.

Oh great, a redpilled ...

 

[Hans Blaster]

"From William I, 1066, to King John, 1199, England was in dire straits. It was bankrupt.
The King invoked the Law of Mortmain, the dead man’s hand, so people couldn’t pass their land on to the church or anyone else without the King’s permission. Without Mortmain the King would lose the land he controlled. The Vatican didn’t like that because the King owed a lot of pounds to the Vatican.
(1). King John refused to accept The Vatican’s representative, Stephen Langton, whom Pope Innocent III installed to rule England
(2) In 1208 England was placed under Papal interdict. (Interdict means a prohibition.)
King John was excommunicated and in trying to regain his stature he groveled before the Pope and returned the title to his kingdoms of England and Ireland to the Pope as vassals, and swore submission and loyalty to him.
... On October 3, 1213, by treaty, King John ratified his surrender of his kingdoms to the Pope"

The Beginning of the Lie: The Secret Treaty of Verona 1213

Once upon a time before the year 1066 the people of England held Allodial title to their land. Not even the king could take the land for not paying a tithe. William the Conquer came in 1066 and sto…

eraoflight.com

It's definitely Ecclesiastical Law.
The Treaty of 1213 aka The Treaty of Verona is all over the web... and just begging to be read.

You're off by a few centuries. None of this is valid US law.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

The British lost us when we won the War of 1812.

War of 1812 wasn't even about Britain trying to reclaim its old territories. It's... a veery complicated number of things, and there was no clear winner, just a signing of the treaty of Ghent in 1814 between both parties to end the war. The battle of New Orleans took place 15 days after the treaty was signed.

 

[AV1611VET]

War of 1812 wasn't even about Britain trying to reclaim its old territories. It's... a veery complicated number of things, and there was no clear winner, just a signing of the treaty of Ghent in 1814 between both parties to end the war. The battle of New Orleans took place 15 days after the treaty was signed.

Actually, I was wrong when I said this:

"The British lost us when we won the War of 1812."

The British lost us following the Revolutionary War.

In the War of 1812, the British lost it's control of the seas, gained when it defeated the Spanish Armada in 1588, to us.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Actually, I was wrong when I said this:

"The British lost us when we won the War of 1812."

The British lost us following the Revolutionary War.

In the War of 1812, the British lost it's control of the seas, gained when it defeated the Spanish Armada in 1588, to us.

No, we still very much had control of the seas after the War of 1812, and we especially didn't lose it to the US. We were the unrivalled power of the ocean up until WW1. We had an empire that covered nearly a quarter of the globe, all of it overseas. Do you think that's kept for over a century by losing control of the seas?

 

[AV1611VET]

No, we still very much had control of the seas after the War of 1812, and we especially didn't lose it to the US. We were the unrivalled power of the ocean up until WW1. We had an empire that covered nearly a quarter of the globe, all of it overseas. Do you think that's kept for over a century by losing control of the seas?

I'm just saying they lost this part of the world when they went ... ahem ... overboard with us.

You know? taxation and love of money and those sorts of things?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

I'm just saying they lost this part of the world when they went ... ahem ... overboard with us.

You know? taxation and love of money and those sorts of things?

Britain still had Canada, the Caribbean, the Falklands, so, no, we didn't lose this part of the world with love of money. It was to pay for a war that was to help 'protect' that of the world from the French and Spanish.

But that's besides the point and far besides the point of the thread. Though your grasp of history is still as poor as ever.

 

[AV1611VET]

Though your grasp of history is still as poor as ever.

At least I know who we belong to.

 

[Diamond72]

When and where did human speech evolve?

At the tower of Babel when God confused language.