Warden_of_the_Storm
Well-Known Member
- Oct 16, 2015
- 12,300
- 6,472
- 29
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Faith
- Deist
- Marital Status
- Single
Its not nonsensical - dismissing or marginalizing History (recorded) is your way of ignoring the significance of it. There is nothing more important to our understanding of the past than recorded history. The study of which is called History. I think its safe to say that 99% of every detail we know about our past is because of History (recorded).
Its not just the start of recorded history - its the start of 99% (don't take my number literally - you get my point) of every detail of our past.
It is nonsensical, since you're arbitrarily trying to split history between history and History (recorded history), which is a pointless and nonsensical distinction because you want your view of YEC and your near idolatrous view of the Bible to be 100% correct, when the Bible is clearly not to be taken as a history text.
Explain the fact of the settlement of Dolní Věstonice, a Paleolithic settlement which includes art and engravings, and is dated to have be lived in between 27,000 and 20,000 BC, with your view of history.
Upvote
0