White House Refuses to Address Arrests of Pro-Lifers

[Bradskii]

That makes the FBI look very incompetent if they have to have all of the conditions you have listed before they can enforce the law. I always thought law enforcement was a 24 7 obligation I had no idea that the FBI could only makes arrests if the crime was "during the day, while they were open, occupied the premises, broadcast that they were going to break federal law on social media prior to the event and live streamed their actions while they were doing it."

It was a comparison. Some wanted to know why the people had been arrested. Well, as they were advertising what they were going to do and live streamed what they were doing it was pretty easy for law enforcement.

And if you want to know how the FBI gets on without being told in advance then type 'pro abortion protestors arrested' into the search engine of your choice and you'll have plenty of examples to keep you interested for the rest of the day. Maybe the feds involved in those arrests didn't get the memo about doing Biden's bidding. Or, and this is just another shot in the dark, they were just doing their job.

Whaddya think?

 

[Hank77]

Why do you think everything is about trump?
It's a common sense observation that Biden is targeting conservatives.

Activists deliberately raise a fuss and call attention to themselves in the loudest way they can. They want to attract both the authorities and the media. They don't get into these activities just to entertain themselves and their kids.

 

[renniks]

Because Trump has been involved in activity that might very well be criminal in nature. Most recently, there's the problem of the documents he took out of the White House after he left office, in violation of at least one law and likely several others.

Might very well? How many years did they have to prove that? Seems like a big waste of time to me.

 

[renniks]

Activists deliberately raise a fuss and call attention to themselves in the loudest way they can. They want to attract both the authorities and the media. They don't get into these activities just to entertain themselves and their kids.

No they get into it, in this case to protest babies being killed.

 

[Bradskii]

No they get into it, in this case to protest babies being killed.

And I support their right to do it legally.

 

[KCfromNC]

Not one word. Not one Jane's Revenge terrorist arrested, last I read.

Why would anyone expect the guy to take time away from doing his job to comment about manufactured outrage from far-right propaganda sources? I mean, might as well complain the guy doesn't address conspiracy theories about aliens captured from UFOs or maybe about bigfoot.

 

[DaisyDay]

These pro-lifers got themselves arrested on purpose - that is the point of civil disobedience, to garner support and publicity for their cause.

 

[disciple Clint]

It was a comparison. Some wanted to know why the people had been arrested. Well, as they were advertising what they were going to do and live streamed what they were doing it was pretty easy for law enforcement.

And if you want to know how the FBI gets on without being told in advance then type 'pro abortion protestors arrested' into the search engine of your choice and you'll have plenty of examples to keep you interested for the rest of the day. Maybe the feds involved in those arrests didn't get the memo about doing Biden's bidding. Or, and this is just another shot in the dark, they were just doing their job.

Whaddya think?

How many people were arrested for protesting outside the homes of SCOTUS Justices, a blatant violation of Federal Law that went on day after day after day.

 

[Bradskii]

How many people were arrested for protesting outside the homes of SCOTUS Justices, a blatant violation of Federal Law that went on day after day after day.

Not directly comparable to the FACE Act. Slippery First Ammendment slope. Just like the armed guys who were protesting outside Amy Acton's house: Protesters gather outside of Dr. Amy Acton’s home

'The Bexley residence of the director of the Ohio Department of Health was the scene of a demonstration on May 2.

According to a Twitter account, people were upset with orders given by Dr. Amy Acton in regards to the COVID-19 pandemic.

“A small group of protestors have gathered in front of the central Ohio home of Dr. Amy Acton. Neighbors report several men walking up and down the street with assault weapons stating that there will be no violence. ‘For now.’”@KRForbesPhoto tweeted.'

Personally I don't think that these syles of protests should be allowed. Which says nothing about the matters in the op. Let's focus on that, shall we?

 

[disciple Clint]

Not directly comparable to the FACE Act. Slippery First Ammendment slope. Just like the armed guys who were protesting outside Amy Acton's house: Protesters gather outside of Dr. Amy Acton’s home

'The Bexley residence of the director of the Ohio Department of Health was the scene of a demonstration on May 2.

According to a Twitter account, people were upset with orders given by Dr. Amy Acton in regards to the COVID-19 pandemic.

“A small group of protestors have gathered in front of the central Ohio home of Dr. Amy Acton. Neighbors report several men walking up and down the street with assault weapons stating that there will be no violence. ‘For now.’”@KRForbesPhoto tweeted.'

Personally I don't think that these syles of protests should be allowed. Which says nothing about the matters in the op. Let's focus on that, shall we?

Let's just answer the question, how many were arrested?

 

[FireDragon76]

That makes the FBI look very incompetent if they have to have all of the conditions you have listed before they can enforce the law. I always thought law enforcement was a 24 7 obligation I had no idea that the FBI could only makes arrests if the crime was "during the day, while they were open, occupied the premises, broadcast that they were going to break federal law on social media prior to the event and live streamed their actions while they were doing it."

Do you even understand vandalism in the first place? Police can't lock somebody up if there is no evidence of who perpetrated a crime.

 

[Bradskii]

Let's just answer the question, how many were arrested?

Exactly the same number as arrested at Acton's house. You remember. The ones with automatic weapons? That'll be a big fat zero.

 

[Gene2memE]

How many people were arrested for protesting outside the homes of SCOTUS Justices, a blatant violation of Federal Law that went on day after day after day.

Those protests likely didn't violate Federal law (as much as some people seem to wish they did)

Couple of reasons.

They were temporary and the protestors were marching, not 'picketing' or 'parading' as defined under the law
They did not explicitly interfere with the justices, nor were they 'interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice'

A precedent not to arrest protestors outside judges' residences had recently been set - anti-lockdown and anti-mask protests outside judges' residences in 2020 and 2021 in Texas, West Virginia, Kentucky and California (among other states) were also not prosecuted. @disciple Clint were you so enamoured of arresting protestors then?

 

[disciple Clint]

Do you even understand vandalism in the first place? Police can't lock somebody up if there is no evidence of who perpetrated a crime.

feel free to explain any excuse that the FBI can use for the failure to do their job.

 

[disciple Clint]

Those protests likely didn't violate Federal law (as much as some people seem to wish they did)

Couple of reasons.

They were temporary and the protestors were marching, not 'picketing' or 'parading' as defined under the law
They did not explicitly interfere with the justices, nor were they 'interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice'

A precedent not to arrest protestors outside judges' residences had recently been set - anti-lockdown and anti-mask protests outside judges' residences in 2020 and 2021 in Texas, West Virginia, Kentucky and California (among other states) were also not prosecuted. @disciple Clint were you so enamoured of arresting protestors then?

federal law — section 1507 of title 18 of the u.s. code — clearly states that it is unlawful to protest near a "residence occupied or used by [a] judge, juror, witness, or court officer"
The "Picketing or Parading" law states that anyone "with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer in the discharge of his duty," cannot picket near a judge's residence. A conviction on this charge could come with up to a year in prison, a fine, or both. Is It Legal to Protest Outside Supreme Court Justices' Homes? - FindLaw

 

[DaisyDay]

How many people were arrested for protesting outside the homes of SCOTUS Justices, a blatant violation of Federal Law that went on day after day after day.

What Federal Law prevents protestors from protesting outside the homes of SCOTUS justices?

ETA. Never mind, I see the post just above this one now.

 

[Hank77]

feel free to explain any excuse that the FBI can use for the failure to do their job.

Why the FBI? I would think the local police should be arresting them and bringing charges.

 

[FireDragon76]

feel free to explain any excuse that the FBI can use for the failure to do their job.

There's no credible leads on the few incidences of vandalism of churches that have occurred, as is the case in many vandalisms.

 

[Bradskii]

feel free to explain any excuse that the FBI can use for the failure to do their job.

Look, this might just be me. But if someone tells everyone that they are going to break a federal law and live stream themselves doing it then the feds don't have any excuse not to arrest the person concerned. I'm sure they have better things to do with their time but if it's a blatant attempt to actually get arrested then they have no choice but to arrest the person. You'd be up in arms if they weren't doing their job.

In cases where some random unknown dude damages a pro life facility and there is no clear evidence as to who did it then the same does not apply. If no-one was actually harmed or prevented from attending the facility then some graffiti or a broken window will be left to local cops. If he or she is found then due process will occur.

Now what am I missing here? Are you saying that some or all federal offices across the country are deliberately targeting some people and ignoring crimes by others? 'Cos if you are then thanks for that opinion. If you have any sort of evidence whatsoever then please share it.

 

[High Fidelity]

People broke the law and got in trouble.

More news at 10.