The only difference between you and those IFB preachers of yours I see online is that they have the courage of their convictions to be explicit about their hate.
You don't get it, do you?
The Bible was written over a period of 4000 years by the same Author.
By the same token (inspiration), the Book of Mormon, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, and My Struggles were written over a period of 95 years by the same author.
For the other readers, who perhaps don't get the "coy game" he is playing, let me help you out.
The "three books" by the "same author" are not actually by the same author, but rather by three different authors who likely never met each other. Only one of them is actually relevant to this thread or sub-forum. The three books are:
1. The "Book of Mormon" which was written by Joseph Smith, Jr. a semi-literate conman from upstate New York in the early 19th century. Smith used his work to build a new religion and eventually (for himself and his closest associates) a sex cult.
2. "On the Origin of Species" was written by Charles Darwin, a mid-19th century British naturalist. Unlike the other works, this book *is* relevant to the topic of discussion. In the post I quoted, the secondary sub-title is used (instead of the main title) as part of a dishonest two part linguistic ploy.
In the first part we get the poster's repeated attempt to make Darwin's work (and Darwin himself) labelled as a racial supremacist and inspiration for all of the worst things those ideas have triggered (more to come). This is part of his overplayed trope of using or quoting old texts using no-longer common word usages as if they reflect modern usage. Here the poster is implying that the races are races of humans to make the sub-title appear racist. In the mid-19th century the term "races" was used for other groupings of biological organisms as well. They would refer to both species of animals as "races" and also of ethnicities (French race, the Irish race) as races. (At this point, I should also note that the various races of humans are largely sociological, with no significant biological differences.)
The second part of the insinuation is about the word "Struggle" and a deliberate attempt to link it to the third text on his list by using an English translation of the title. This is a clear attempt to tie the two works together and a favorite linguistic trick of the poster. A better subtitle in more modern English for Darwin's book would be "
On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection of Favorable Traits for Their Environments." (The italicized part is the missing original title/sub-title.)
3. The last book is the infamous prison political polemic of Adolf Hitler, better known by its original title in German,
Mein Kampf. By translating the title to English, the poster connects it to the sub-sub-title of Darwin's first masterwork and by implication characterizes Darwin's work as racist and nazi.
This is an old linguistic dirty trick the poster has used many times. It is below decent discussion, but as has been repeatedly demonstrated, not below the poster. (And for the Christians, and especially the anti-evolution sub-set on this thread, he is trying to subvert any theological or scientific arguments you have against evolution with dirty linguistic tricks and insinuations about the developers of evolutionary theory. Be better than him for your own sake.)
