Should we have said "correlation doesn't mean causation" and ignored correlation as meaningless (Phillip Morris certainly wanted you to!) Or are you happy that we began examining if there was any causation?
With something such as a vaccine that is fast becoming mandatory - ignoring correlation is to our peril if it does indeed equal causation in many cases.
Vaccines already are known to have adverse reactions.
What are your stats, that you already know, comparing the percentage of nicotine users having trouble, versus bad results for COVID vaccine users?
At 17:45 on the video, Sheryl says > "Since then I have seen multiple neurologists, one of whom diagnosed me with vaccine-induced auto-immune neuropathy, although he did tell me that he was flying blind, because he had never seen a reaction like this to a vaccine, and hence doesn't know how to treat me."
And one neurologist diagnosed her with multiple sclerosis, even though her brain scan showed nothing of this.
In any case, her case was considered to be "auto-immune". I understand this would mean her own system reacted the wrong way to the vaccine.
So, among other items of this situation, a neurologist did know what her problem was. So, it already is known. But apparently it is so rare, that he says he never saw what she had, before.
Now, of course, we need to consider if it has been so rare because other vaccines have not been messenger RNA vaccines. But, even so, with my limited knowledge, I also see the point that messenger RNA vaccines seem to use only a part of a virus, while earlier ones use whole viruses, even; and so the messenger RNA vaccines have fewer antigens to cause bad immune reactions, for all I know, which could make them less risky.
So, what are the stats for the earlier non-MRNA vaccinations, in comparison with these newer ones?
So, like I ask . . . if we have the stats . . . what is the percentage of earlier vaccine deaths and neurological problems, compared to percentage of deaths and problems with smoking, compared with MRNA vaccine problems? Or . . . maybe, lots of things happened with smoking and earlier vaccines, but people did not give it enough attention . . . so now it can seem like the MRNA vaccines are the dirtbag item, when actually they have caused less problems. I don't know, of course.
But what about Maddie?
31:40 > here we can hear what Maddie's mother says. Maddie helped with the clinical trial of vaccines for children > "for twelve-to-fifteen year-olds". "Her two older brothers" in the family also participated in the trials, very eagerly. And her husband is "in the medical field" and they are pro-vaccine and pro-science. Before the second vaccine, Maddie was healthy and twelve years old, a straight-A student.
33:00 > Maddie had pain, right away, after the second shot, "at the injection sight". "And over the next twenty-four hours she developed severe abdominal and chest pain". "She had painful electrical shocks down her neck and spine that forced her to walk hunched over", and "extreme pain in her fingers and toes", and edema. Her father took her to the ER.
She was checked for appendicitis. Her reported diagnosis said, "adverse effect of vaccine initial encounter".
So, I note how though she is not a middle-aged woman like others testifying, she is a twelve year old female who had two older brothers getting their clinical test shot. But two guys in her same family are not reported to have had a reaction, while she has so oppositely reacted.
I did not find anything, so far, claiming a risk of vaccine reactions helped by birth control drugs. So far, my reading indicates that clots in females could be because of birth control hormones, but COVID-19-caused clots in females are different that birth control caused clots.
But > there do seem to be neurological disorders already known to be caused by vaccines or connected with psychological reactions somehow connected with the vaccine >
Here is a neurological group's article which seems to me to say neurological things can result from psychological ways of handling things >
Helping the Public Understand Adverse Events Associated With COVID-19 Vaccinations: Lessons Learned From Functional Neurological Disorder | Neurology | JAMA Neurology | JAMA Network
And here is what another article says >
"It becomes critical to know whether these vaccines will cause neurologic disorders like previously recognized vaccine-related demyelinating diseases, fever-induced seizure, and other possible deficits."
To my knowledge, demyelination would not be due to psychological reaction, but because of autoimmune reaction.
This quote is here >
The potential neurological effect of the COVID-19 vaccines: A review - PubMed
So, these sorts of reactions are known, already, but there are different ideas, maybe, about what is psychological and what is autoimmune. It seems possible ones know, but they are quite aware of how much they don't know.
