The first six were completely wrong and at that point it was obvious the link writer had no clue what they were talking about so I stopped wasting my time looking up the studies. In your honest opinion, how many citations that are nothing more than steaming bull excrement should I reasonably be expected to read before I get to one that might not be completely wrong and still consider the whole thing to be valid article as valid?
Some of the earlier studies delt with kids that were preprubertal discordance. The issue is they were confused about their gender. Kids didn't run around claiming to be transgendered. They thought they might be girls. In the end it turned out they were xonfus s about what they were and were homosexual boys instead. Now what would have happened if we listened to them and started giving them blockers and so on. Helping them become girls. It would have been a nightmare for them.
Later studies absolutely included transgender kids and they show they primarily stop being transgender as they get older.
I'm done with this conversation. You and others like you will never be convinced no matter what study is shown. You will just call them haters if they disagree with you and your nonsense about kids being transgendered. The blockers and so on are dangerous and there are more and more people coming back wishing they didn't transition. Kids are NOT mentally capable of making such a life changing decision. Their brains have not fully developed and neither have their bodies. It's patently absurd to think they have any real clue as to what they are doing it getting themselves into at that age. Especially when so many of them do not stay transgendered. How many transgender kids grow up to stay trans?
Upvote
0