Exactly. ONLY amateurs.
You are welcome to show me wrong if you disagree.
Richard Feynman himself said that we can never prove something true using science, we can only ever prove it wrong, and even if we have a massive number of experiments which support the theory we are testing, we can never say that the theory has been proven.
Please note that whenever we have a theory which has a huge number of experiments supporting it, anyone who comes along and says that the theory is wrong had better have a very good theory to replace it with, and they had also better explain why the first theory was wrong.
For example, Newton's theories about how the planets moved worked really well. Einstein came along and said they were wrong, and he was able to provide a better theory AND he was able to explain exactly how Newton got things wrong.
Or do you think that that Richard Feynman and Albert Einstein were amateur scientists?
By the way, what point are you trying to make here? You claimed in post 275 that a true evolutionist (and I assume that you accept that this applies to any scientist as well) would never claim to be right, to which I agreed.
However, I said that a real scientist is more likely to say, "We are probably right due to the large amount of supporting evidence we have." Yet now you are claiming that a real scientist would say this either.
So tell me, what exactly do you think a real scientist would say?
Perhaps, "Gee, all our experiments have given us results that cluster around this one particular explanation, so I guess we better tell everyone we don't have the foggiest notion what's going on"?