Obviously, Biden doesn't pass laws, so presumably you were referring to an executive order of some kind. Which one? I assert that he has done nothing remotely like what you have said.
From Biden's page:
This seems reasonable and useful and doesn't at all stop people from owning guns.It creates a national firearm registry that anyone – including every
level of law enforcement and the military – can access.
Gun owners should keep their guns in a safe place, where they can't get stolen, where children can't get access to them and can't load them and fire them.The registry would require one to tell the government exactly
where one’s firearms are stored.
This seems reasonable. Just like driving a car, people should be trained in gun safety.One would need a license simply to own a firearm.
Completely reasonable.Mandatory “psychological evaluations” are required receive this license.
Seems reasonable. User pays, why should society as a whole pay?One would need to pay $800 for “firearm insurance.”
Seems reasonable. A sports hunter does not spray and pray. This 10 round restriction is a compromise to help reduce these mass shootings that USA has so many of.It would enact extreme ammunition restrictions, including
a ban on magazines more than 10 rounds.
Laws need to have consequences otherwise people won't follow themViolating the above provisions could lead to a prison sentence
of up to 40 years and a fine of up to $150,000."
One of each. 11yr girl 6yr boy
Thakn you. A nice simple breakdown. Each of those things appears completely reasonable to me. It's essentially what we have going on in canada.This seems reasonable and useful and doesn't at all stop people from owning guns.
Gun owners should keep their guns in a safe place, where they can't get stolen, where children can't get access to them and can't load them and fire them.
This seems reasonable. Just like driving a car, people should be trained in gun safety.
Completely reasonable.
People with mental health issues or anger management issues should not own guns.
Seems reasonable. User pays, why should society as a whole pay?
Seems reasonable. A sports hunter does not spray and pray. This 10 round restriction is a compromise to help reduce these mass shootings that USA has so many of.
Laws need to have consequences otherwise people won't follow them
Non of the above is trying to stop people from owning guns.
No I would not.okay cool, one of each myself. My son is 3 and my daughter is 11 months.
If you watched your daughter walk into a bathroom and then watched a grown transgender man (literally a man) walk in right behind her, would you be inclined to enter the bathroom as well, just for the sake of being present?
New Zealand just had a major confiscation...once the nation's citizens are compelled to no longer see their freedom as a right via social engineering efforts, I am not surprised that some could find these sentiments "reasonable."This seems reasonable and useful and doesn't at all stop people from owning guns.
Gun owners should keep their guns in a safe place, where they can't get stolen, where children can't get access to them and can't load them and fire them.
This seems reasonable. Just like driving a car, people should be trained in gun safety.
Completely reasonable.
People with mental health issues or anger management issues should not own guns.
Seems reasonable. User pays, why should society as a whole pay?
Seems reasonable. A sports hunter does not spray and pray. This 10 round restriction is a compromise to help reduce these mass shootings that USA has so many of.
Laws need to have consequences otherwise people won't follow them
None of the above is trying to stop people from owning guns.
I got my first gun when I was 5, taught how to use it, and always had access to it and ammunition. Am I an outlier?
That's what New American says Biden was going to do. What did Biden actually do?
Anti-trans feminists are cancelling Biden for signing an order that reverses Trump's definition of gender as 'biological sex'From Biden's page:
I don't see where they dictate where to take dumps.
- Protect LGBTQ+ people from discrimination.
- Support LGBTQ+ youth.
- Protect LGBTQ+ individuals from violence and work to end the epidemic of violence against the transgender community, particularly transgender women of color.
- Expand access to high-quality health care for LGBTQ+ individuals.
- Ensure fair treatment of LGBTQ+ individuals in the criminal justice system.
- Collect data necessary to fully support the LGBTQ+ community.
- Advance global LGBTQ+ rights and development.
This here is the only Bill that the 117th Congress has passed, so what law are you referring to?The law Biden passed
Ha! I got a bb gun for my boy too. IT was quite a thing to get my wife (and her city friends....we are all city though) to see the purpose.I'm from the South...some 'round here might say I was a late bloomer
My parents allowing me to go out with it unsupervised might have been too much (it was a .22 rifle). I'll watch my son like a hawk, but I still think 5-7 is an appropriate age for a boy to get a BB gun as long as he knows he doesn't touch it without me or his mom around.
Ha! I got a bb gun for my boy too. IT was quite a thing to get my wife (and her city friends....we are all city though) to see the purpose.
Same rules for me though.