What Do You Consider Evidence of the Supernatural?

[jamesbond007]

I see you came back to conclusively demonstrate that you know nothing about physics or cosmology. Sigh.

@Hans Blaster you don't know diddly squat. I already explained while all you have is BS, strawmen, red herrings, and more.

 

[jamesbond007]

But you're not explaining them. Goddidit is not an explanation.

It's just another example of the "God of the gaps" theology that so many creationists seem fond of.

You definitely have to keep up.

 

[jamesbond007]

It's always refreshing to hear from a nobody on the internet that scientists don't know the very basic of the science they're studying during their whole life.

Creation scientists know, but can't participate in peer reviews anymore due to politics. It's the atheist scientists who do not know anything. They aren't just morons, but idiots.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Sure it is. Nothing else explains it. The Christians have evidence on their side and can answer what was there before the big bang with God and Kalam's Cosmological Argument. The atheist scientists have nothing, but fake hypotheses like multiverse.

No, again, just because you personally cannot understand it does not mean that it cannot be explained. You have shown absolutely no understanding of any of the science you rail against.

Haha. It is you who does not understand science. Even Stephen Hawking did not understand science. He wrote in his book, A Brief History of Tiem, that one could travel back into the past. What a idiotic notion. You would not be able to do that nor explain how to do it.

OTOH, I have already explained how one can travel into the future. One can only do that using Einstein's theory of special relativity. You couldn't even understand that.

We always travel into the future, that's how time works. It is possible to travel backwards in time because anything is possible, but it is highly improbable that one can travel backwards in time without expending vast amounts of energy.

That is more evidence. It was actually prehistoric times. How can prehistoric people write such things they didn't know. Only God knew.

Post hoc ergo propter hoc. Prehistoric people didn't write such things. You, and others who claim such things, say they did because you worship the Bible more than you worship God.

 

[Hans Blaster]

It was actually prehistoric times. How can prehistoric people write such things they didn't know. Only God knew.

Prehistoric refers to times *before* writing. Ergo, nothing could be written then. No book or text is prehistoric.

 

[jamesbond007]

The problem is that so can everyone else and there isn’t a shred of evidence for any of it.

List of creation myths - Wikipedia

You know that Greek and Roman gods were mythological as we all do. This is because of the apostles teaching the prehistoric people at the time they were myths. How else do you think we know this today?

 

[jamesbond007]

Prehistoric refers to times *before* writing. Ergo, nothing could be written then. No book or text is prehistoric.

Wrong. You believe in cave people as prehistoric. There were no such Flinstones types living in caves. It's another one of you evolutionary myths .

 

[Hans Blaster]

Creation scientists know, but can't participate in peer reviews anymore due to politics.

Do you know anything about peer review? Have you ever done it? (I have.)

Peer review is for reviewing science. "creation science" is not science; it never has been. If a "creation science" believer (and it is a belief system rather than a science) does some science they can get it published. There is no "creation science" bar in most sciences as they aren't in conflict with the "teachings" of "creationism". (i.e., polymer chemistry, virology, materials science, agronomy, etc.).

 

[Hans Blaster]

Wrong. You believe in cave people as prehistoric. There were no such Flinstones types living in caves. It's another one of you evolutionary myths .

Obviously the Flinstones is fictional. There are no cars powered by feet on the ground, nor humans living with dinosaurs. (Birds excepted)

 

[jamesbond007]

We always travel into the future, that's how time works. It is possible to travel backwards in time because anything is possible, but it is highly improbable that one can travel backwards in time without expending vast amounts of energy.

Yes, you got one thing right. It is impossible to travel backward in time because of no parallel universe or multiverse.

Most of your post is blabbering. Here is how someone travels forward in time using a "time machine."

You can start at 4:00 if you don't have "time."

 

[Hans Blaster]

You know that Greek and Roman gods were mythological as we all do. This is because of the apostles teaching the prehistoric people at the time they were myths. How else do you think we know this today?

The Greek gods probably emerge in Greek pre-history, but we know about them because the Greeks wrote about them. (I'm not sure what "apostles" you speak of here.) The Roman gods are mostly adapted from the Greek gods in the period of Roman literature, not pre-history.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Yes, you got one thing right. It is impossible to travel backward in time because of no parallel universe or multiverse.

Most of your post is blabbering. Here is how someone travels forward in time using a "time machine."

You can start at 4:00 if you don't have "time."

I'm going to ignore it because you're just proving a point: you have no evidence whatsoever for the supernatural. Because the supernatural, by it's own definition, cannot leave evidence. It is beyond nature, beyond the natural.

 

[jamesbond007]

Do you know anything about peer review? Have you ever done it? (I have.)

Peer review is for reviewing science. "creation science" is not science; it never has been. If a "creation science" believer (and it is a belief system rather than a science) does some science they can get it published. There is no "creation science" bar in most sciences as they aren't in conflict with the "teachings" of "creationism". (i.e., polymer chemistry, virology, materials science, agronomy, etc.).

I've done walkthroughs as my career wasn't in the physical sciences.

I can't believe how wrong you are. Creation science is the real science. You really need to learn a thing or two as atheist (fake) science has just led you off the deep end. Otherwise, you'd be the one with the evidence. You haven't posted any in many posts.

Obviously the Flinstones is fictional. There are no cars powered by feet on the ground, nor humans living with dinosaurs. (Birds excepted)

Haha. Birds are not dinosaurs. They're birds. See, how easily they stupefied your brain. You don't know that humans never lives in caves (except temporarily to take shelter). Otherwise, show us the evidence.

Like I said, you can't show anything. Big talk. No show. Women must be disappointed in you.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Yes, you got one thing right. It is impossible to travel backward in time because of no parallel universe or multiverse.

Most of your post is blabbering. Here is how someone travels forward in time using a "time machine."

You can start at 4:00 if you don't have "time."

Time dilation is not traveling in time (forward) any more that sitting on you couch is traveling in time.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

The Greek gods probably emerge in Greek pre-history, but we know about them because the Greeks wrote about them. (I'm not sure what "apostles" you speak of here.) The Roman gods are mostly adapted from the Greek gods in the period of Roman literature, not pre-history.

Lots of stuff is written that the Romans basically adopted the Greek gods into their own pantheon because the early Italian civilizations that became the Romans had gods already similar to the Greek gods and went "Hey, their gods are like our gods! Let's put them together with ours."

 

[Hans Blaster]

Otherwise, you'd be the one with the evidence. You haven't posted any in many posts.

If I literally posted *zero* evidence, I'd still be ahead of you.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Otherwise, you'd be the one with the evidence. You haven't posted any in many posts.

And you've never even touched on any supposed evidence whatsoever for your claims.

 

[Jonathan Walkerin]

Creation science is the real science.

Yeah, firmament and all that. Very real. All those poor satellites making craters above our heads.

 

[Speedwell]

Creation scientists know, but can't participate in peer reviews anymore due to politics. It's the atheist scientists who do not know anything. They aren't just morons, but idiots.

Your ignorant and bigoted attitude towards those you call "atheist scientists" is no doubt disgusting to scientists who happen to be atheists, but it is also rightly disgusting to those who are Christians or other theists. All you are accomplishing with your invective and ridiculous pseudoscience is to bring Christianity into disrepute.

 

[jamesbond007]

I'm going to ignore it because you're just proving a point: you have no evidence whatsoever for the supernatural. Because the supernatural, by it's own definition, cannot leave evidence. It is beyond nature, beyond the natural.

I have evidence using science. There is no multiverse, so one can't go back in time. It's strange that Hawking and several others believe this hyposteses.