- Dec 31, 2018
- 22,551
- 8,436
- Country
- Canada
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Private
All of this is verifiable by going to the websites of the below mentioned.
The National Academy of Medicine is a foundation created by other foundations, which once got funding from the US govt now gets funded privately from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Trust, the World Economic Forum, the Rockefeller Foundation, the US agency for International Development USAID to name a few. It is overseen by members pf the funding organizations and is chaired by a DR Dzau who is also affiliated with the GPMB, the School of Population and Global Health (eugenics?) and also with a foundation called CEPI affiliated with the World Economic Forum and founded by, along with others, six of the world's largest pharmaceuticals.
On the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board GPMB (on which Fauci of the NIH and White House task force sits), a foundation created by the World Bank and WHO, it being a frontal organization for both. A foundation which sought input from other related foundations such as the Int. Red Cross, Johns Hopkins, World Trust and even themselves by way of the World Bank and World Health, and produced a report called A World at Risk in Sept 2019 which is basically their manifesto. This report recommended increased funding for the GPMB, World Bank and WHO by increasing funding from taxpayers to their funders, funders which wrote the reports put in the manifesto.
These are the foundations including the Gates Foundation and Johns Hopkins that hosted a pandemic planning exercise called Event 201 in mid October 2019. Part of the agenda put forward by a delegate from the WB and now a associate dean of the School of Population and Global Health, (notice how all are connected) was to find a way to encourage increased funding which people tend not to follow through on, because without an actual pandemic, they are not taken seriously. Another part of their agenda dealt with controlling the message in the event of a pandemic, which in their words was to 'flood' everything with their message and play up the fear factor.
You may know of one of the board members of GPMB who also spent seven years with the Gates Foundation, one Anthony Fauci. The GPMB which made the report that lead to Event 201 which coincidentally was followed by a pandemic a month later (the UN calls for at least two pandemic simulations in their preparedness literature). So the head of the White House Task Force was one of those behind Event 201, but no conflict of interest there. Just a convenient way to insure 'flooding'.
So what has been the result of the pandemic so far? Have the players of Event 201 'flooded' the world with their narrative? Has the world decided to give them billions of dollars of taxpayer's money just like they hoped for through a crisis? It worked with global warming so why not health? They don't even have to produce weapons for profit like the increasingly obsolete military-industrial complex once did/still does. All they had to do was control the narrative and manage the fear factor.
The National Academy of Medicine is a foundation created by other foundations, which once got funding from the US govt now gets funded privately from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Trust, the World Economic Forum, the Rockefeller Foundation, the US agency for International Development USAID to name a few. It is overseen by members pf the funding organizations and is chaired by a DR Dzau who is also affiliated with the GPMB, the School of Population and Global Health (eugenics?) and also with a foundation called CEPI affiliated with the World Economic Forum and founded by, along with others, six of the world's largest pharmaceuticals.
On the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board GPMB (on which Fauci of the NIH and White House task force sits), a foundation created by the World Bank and WHO, it being a frontal organization for both. A foundation which sought input from other related foundations such as the Int. Red Cross, Johns Hopkins, World Trust and even themselves by way of the World Bank and World Health, and produced a report called A World at Risk in Sept 2019 which is basically their manifesto. This report recommended increased funding for the GPMB, World Bank and WHO by increasing funding from taxpayers to their funders, funders which wrote the reports put in the manifesto.
These are the foundations including the Gates Foundation and Johns Hopkins that hosted a pandemic planning exercise called Event 201 in mid October 2019. Part of the agenda put forward by a delegate from the WB and now a associate dean of the School of Population and Global Health, (notice how all are connected) was to find a way to encourage increased funding which people tend not to follow through on, because without an actual pandemic, they are not taken seriously. Another part of their agenda dealt with controlling the message in the event of a pandemic, which in their words was to 'flood' everything with their message and play up the fear factor.
You may know of one of the board members of GPMB who also spent seven years with the Gates Foundation, one Anthony Fauci. The GPMB which made the report that lead to Event 201 which coincidentally was followed by a pandemic a month later (the UN calls for at least two pandemic simulations in their preparedness literature). So the head of the White House Task Force was one of those behind Event 201, but no conflict of interest there. Just a convenient way to insure 'flooding'.
So what has been the result of the pandemic so far? Have the players of Event 201 'flooded' the world with their narrative? Has the world decided to give them billions of dollars of taxpayer's money just like they hoped for through a crisis? It worked with global warming so why not health? They don't even have to produce weapons for profit like the increasingly obsolete military-industrial complex once did/still does. All they had to do was control the narrative and manage the fear factor.
