Is forced vaccination related to the mark of the beast?

[Gregory Thompson]

You cannot add up their ages. It is the birth of the sons you add.

100 years Seth was born.
105 years Enosh was born.
90 years Kenan was born.
70 years Mahalal was born.
65 years Yered was born.
162 years Enoch was born.
65 years Methusala was born.
187 years Lemekh was born.
182 years Noah was born.
500 years Noah had 3 sons.
100 years the Flood.

Add those numbers up. 1626.

Abraham was 75 years old when God called him which was 365 years after the Flood.

365 + 1626 = 1991

So Abraham was called out 1991 years after Adam was banned from the Garden.

Next Easter will be 1991 years from Jesus Christ's death on the Cross.

In the parables of the workers there were 2 6 hour shifts. 6 AM to Noon and from Noon to 6 PM. Some were paid a days wage for 12 hours. Those who worked the last hour, 5 to 6, were also paid a days wage. There was a huge uproar from those who worked 12 hours, why they did not get more. If you can convince your boss to go by Bible standards, good luck.

Timing is not precise since the people who wrote the new testament had a shorter year than us.

 

[claninja]

These kinds of articles are everywhere on medical web sights.

Gain-of-Function Research: Background and Alternatives - Potential Risks and Benefits of Gain-of-Function Research - NCBI Bookshelf
Rethinking Gain-of-Function Experiments in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic
Feds lift gain-of-function research pause, offer guidance
https://www.med.unc.edu/orfeome/fil...ruses-shows-potential-for-human-emergence.pdf

These are articles from reputable sources, so thank you for providing them.

However, even from the article you provided, current scientific consensus does not attribute COVID-19 to GOF and/or accidental escape from a lab.

"In recent months, the argument was raised that SARS-CoV-2 may have accidentally escaped from a high-containment laboratory in Wuhan, China (10). At this time, the scientific consensus is that the virus emerged as a zoonosis whereby it jumped from an animal host, possibly bats or pangolins, to humans (11), and arguments about a laboratory origin for SARS-CoV-2 are more akin to a conspiracy theory than to a scientifically credible hypothesis. In the very unlikely event that SARS-Cov-2 had emerged by accidental escape from a lab, however, that would be a great cause for concern because the Wuhan facility was state of the art and presumably operating with a high degree of care." (Rethinking Gain-of-Function Experiments in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic)

Coronaviruses other than the "original" 4 that have been known to cause colds (2) and pneumonia (2 - usually in elderly people). As well as outside of MERS and SARS "classic".

you said this:

"I believe there's likely more than one "Covid 19 virus" out there. Not just different strands of the same virus."

Hence I asked, cold, flu, norovirus, etc?

It's either different strains of Coronavirus or a different virus altogether

Taking gain of function research to living test subjects is a stupid idea. The job of ribosomes is to fix genetic mistakes. As soon as researchers successfully infect an animal research subject with their chimera virus; if it works, the animal's own ribosomes will make the chimeric virus more efficient. And as soon as that animal starts producing virus; invariably it's going to get out of your lab.

Now various research labs from around the world have been playing with this (coronavirus gain of function research) for at least about 10 years. The earliest research papers I've seen go back to about 2008. (There may be earlier ones that I haven't seen.)

The US has research labs working on this kind of thing. Los Alamos lab actually got shut down in August 2019 for "breach of containment" The portion of the report that was heard by congress didn't charge anyone with negligence because they claimed it was researchers who left doors open for suppliers to being items in and out.

Yet if you have live animals who are expelling virus; you have a much greater chance of it escaping containment and infecting humans than humans manipulating RNA sequences in a petri dish. We're talking virus molecules that are microns in size. They are certainly capable of getting outside of containment once your animal research subjects begin producing virus.

I've seen research publications from Scandinavia, Israel and China.

We know SARS -cov2 can infect mice, rats, bats, monkeys, pengolas ferrets, cats, dogs, humans, goats, not sure about cattle? Isn't known to infect chickens, ducks or geese.

It's very unusual for a naturally occurring mutating virus to be able to infect multiple species right out of the gate like that. Viruses are usually species specific.

No disagreement that GOF risks can outweigh the benefits.

But this is not evidence that COVID-19 was a human invented virus relating to GOF and/or escaping from a lab.

Not being prepared for a pandemic is one form of foolishness. Two known "pandemic exercises" were run in 2019 prior to any one known to have caught Covid 19. One was conducted by John Hopkins / Gates Foundations (Event 201) and one by the US National Department of Heath (Crimson Contagion).

Here is where I would agree with you. Not being prepared for a global pandemic, considering we have a global economy and international travel, is as you put it "foolish".

Here are a list of some pandemic exercises run since 2001.

Past exercises held by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security


Additionally, another great article on the outcomes of pandemic exercises and how policy makers did not take them seriously enough to enact policy changes, another "foolish decision".

Two decades of pandemic war games failed to account for Donald Trump

Creating a pandemic either accidentally (or intentionally) is a whole other level of stupid. At best it's a negligent bioweapon. At worst it's a biological warfare crime against humanity.

Yes, I agree. But there is no credible evidence to support that COVID-19 was a lab produced virus which was accidentally or intentionally leaked.

No credible evidence supporting claims of the laboratory engineering of SARS-CoV-2

Had you noticed how quickly governments jumped on this thing? Bureaucracies tend to run on inertia. We won't pay attention to anything unless it gets so bad that we can't ignore it any more. Yet, governments around the world didn't do that in this case. They jumped on this thing and locked down the planet. That tells me that more than one "someone" knew what this was.

Considering we didn't have enough data on the infectious rate or death rate at the time and even still kind of presently, as well as an effective treatment, a lockdown/social distancing was/is the best tool to help flatten the curve in order to prevent the hospitals from being overloaded. That was/is the main goal. It's well known, as this is a common exercise in pandemic tests

(Who are they?)

Look at who conducted the research on these articles and you'll know who "they" are.

Can you provide the "they" from reputable sources that are promoting COVID-19 as GOF that escaped from a lab?

 

[claninja]

When men openly say they want to bring about a global government, how can it be a "theory"?

Wanting and being a reality are 2 different things.

If two or more people work together for a common goal, is it a "conspiracy"?

Only if done illegally.

Conspiracy definition: An agreement between two or more people to commit an illegal act, along with an intent to achieve the agreement's goal.

Conspiracy and Conspiracy Theory have different definitions:

Conspiracy Theory definition: a belief that some covert but influential organization is responsible for a circumstance or event.

The belief in a future new world order under a one world totalitarian government is a conspiracy theory:

New World Order (conspiracy theory) - Wikipedia

Are you saying Christians do not need to worry about a one world government during a future time?

There are plenty of things to worry about, but be encouraged for Christ has already overcome the world.

John 16:33 I have told you these things so that in Me you may have peace. In the world you will have tribulation. But take courage; I have overcome the world!”

I don't believe Christians need to worry about a 1 world government any more than worrying about trying to put food on the table for their families or diseases or suffering or persecution or loss of a 401K or being evicted, [insert earthly worldy problem], etc... because Christ has over come.

For those who are truly in Christ, none of the worldly problems and tribulations can every trample or take away the freedom that we have been given in Christ. That is the only freedom that truly matters.

So we pray for peaceful governments so that we may continue to worship in peace

1 timothy 2:2 for kings and all those in authority—so that we may lead tranquil and quiet lives in all godliness and dignity.

But when we are put in chains or beaten we still praise God for being counted worthy to suffer as Christ did.

Acts 5:41 The apostles left the Sanhedrin, rejoicing that they had been counted worthy of suffering disgrace for the Name

 

[BABerean2]

Only if done illegally.

Conspiracy definition: An agreement between two or more people to commit an illegal act, along with an intent to achieve the agreement's goal.

The following link reveals the word does not always refer to something illegal, or evil. See definition 5.

Definition of conspiracy | Dictionary.com


Do you believe there will be a future time when the nations of the world will be ruled by a dictatorial one world government, which will persecute the Church on a global scale?


.

 

[The Righterzpen]

But this is not evidence that COVID-19 was a human invented virus relating to GOF and/or escaping from a lab.

Except there are parts of this virus that don't fit a zoonotic model. Natural mutations swap out nucleotides here and there, not whole RNA sequences from whole other viruses.

SARS-CoV-2 furin cleavage site revisited

How did that happen in a "naturally occurring" mutation? How does this cleavage site tend to be a "best fit" for human ACE II receptors?

SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Shares Sequence with a Human Protein

 

[claninja]

The following link reveals the word does not always refer to something illegal, or evil. See definition 5.

Definition of conspiracy | Dictionary.com

Sure. But that was not the point. The point was the definition of conspiracy and conspiracy theory are different.

the one world order is a well known conspiracy theory, which is especially popular among those of millennial dispensation such as premils.

New World Order (conspiracy theory) - Wikipedia

Do you believe there will be a future time when the nations of the world will be ruled by a dictatorial one world government, which will persecute the Church on a global scale?

No more than AI enslaving humanity, Aliens descending upon from space, or 3rd temple being built in Jerusalem where animal sacrifices will resume to honor Christ. It's in the realm of possibility, but I don't believe that's the what the Bible was pointing too.

Where do the gospels and/or epistles mention a future one world government, in order to substantiate that the correct interpretation of revelation is in fact about a future to us one world government that will persecute the church on a global scale?

 

[claninja]

Except there are parts of this virus that don't fit a zoonotic model. Natural mutations swap out nucleotides here and there, not whole RNA sequences from whole other viruses.

SARS-CoV-2 furin cleavage site revisited

According to whose opinion? Not this article you posted.

From the last paragraph of the article you provided the link to:

"An interesting question is the origin of the furin cleavage site it SARS-CoV-2. Its closest relative, the bat isolate RaTG13, does not have this site. Nor do any of the other bat SARS-like CoVs or the pangolin CoVs that have been isolated. However recently a newly isolated bat SARS-like CoV, RmYN02, was shown to contain a poly basic amino acid insertion in the spike glycoprotein. This observation supports the hypothesis that the furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 arose by recombination among bat viruses in nature."

How did that happen in a "naturally occurring" mutation? How does this cleavage site tend to be a "best fit" for human ACE II receptors?

How did this happen naturally? Zoonotic disease are common, which requires mutation to go from animals to humans.

"Zoonotic diseases are very common, both in the United States and around the world. Scientists estimate that more than 6 out of every 10 known infectious diseases in people can be spread from animals, and 3 out of every 4 new or emerging infectious diseases in people come from animals. Because of this, CDC works 24/7 to protect people from zoonotic diseases in the United States and around the world." (Zoonotic Diseases | One Health | CDC)


Here are several hypotheses for how this can happen naturally, which the author of the articles believes surmounts the argument of man made in the laboratory.

The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2

Again, the scientific consensus is that this is not a GOF and/or escapee from a lab, as demonstrated by one of the first articles you shared.

 

[claninja]

SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Shares Sequence with a Human Protein

From this article you posted, there is no mention of a laboratory made COVID virus. It's simply about a hypothesis as to how SARS-CoV-2 might infect.

"The study “is all computationally based with no wet experiments. Hence we have zero information on what the authors are suggesting is at all correct,” cautions Vincent Racaniello, a virologist at Columbia University who was not involved in the work, in an email to The Scientist. He also questioned the idea that the cleavage of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein by human furin could usurp cleavage of the epithelial sodium channel."

None of the articles you have provided thus far, while being from more reputable sources, mention any evidence in favor of a lab created COVID-19. It has all been to the contrary.

 

[BABerean2]

Sure. But that was not the point. The point was the definition of conspiracy and conspiracy theory are different.

the one world order is a well known conspiracy theory, which is especially popular among those of millennial dispensation such as premils.

New World Order (conspiracy theory) - Wikipedia

Do you realize any person can submit information to Wikipedia?
It is a reasonable quick source for general information, but should not be used for serious research on a topic.

I will say it again.
The efforts of the World Federalist Association cannot be a "conspiracy theory".
Based on definition 5 from the source I gave you these people are conspiring to bring about a one world government. It cannot be a "theory" because they have admitted they are working toward this goal.

Therefore, your efforts to label the video of Walter Cronkite at the World Federalists meeting as a "conspiracy theory" cannot be a true assessment of reality.
I do understand why many people do not want to admit this truth, even when they see it with their own eyes.

I recently had a man I care about get extremely upset with me over this issue.
When I told him I was looking for the truth no matter how painful, he asked me what I was going to do if I found the truth.
His statement shocked me.
He then proceeded to call me a "conspiratorialist".
I reminded him that Christ had spoken to Pilate about what is the truth.
The next day he called and apologized to me for what he had said.

Sometimes the truth is so painful that we will attack others, rather than face it.


Interview with Norman Dodd: The Hidden Agenda for World Government

.

 

[Steve_K]

The belief in a future new world order under a one world totalitarian government is a conspiracy theory:

New World Order (conspiracy theory) - Wikipedia

Do you realize any person can submit information to Wikipedia?
It is a reasonable quick source for general information, but should not be used for serious research on a topic.

Most people aren't even aware of the controversies and scandals regarding Wikipedia. As with our government/corporate controlled mainstream media (i.e. propaganda), it's anything but a neutral and objective source of information people think it is.

Wikipedia: A Disinformation Operation?

 

[BABerean2]

Sure. But that was not the point. The point was the definition of conspiracy and conspiracy theory are different.

the one world order is a well known conspiracy theory, which is especially popular among those of millennial dispensation such as premils.

New World Order (conspiracy theory) - Wikipedia



No more than AI enslaving humanity, Aliens descending upon from space, or 3rd temple being built in Jerusalem where animal sacrifices will resume to honor Christ. It's in the realm of possibility, but I don't believe that's the what the Bible was pointing too.

Where do the gospels and/or epistles mention a future one world government, in order to substantiate that the correct interpretation of revelation is in fact about a future to us one world government that will persecute the church on a global scale?

A quote from David Rockefeller's book:

.

 

[claninja]

Do you realize any person can submit information to Wikipedia?

Yes, that is why you always check the references at the bottom of the page that are cited.

"The common theme in conspiracy theories about a New World Order is that a secretive power elite with a globalist agenda is conspiring to eventually rule the world through an authoritarian world government—which will replace sovereign nation-states—and an allencompassing propaganda whose ideology hails the establishment of the New World Order as the culmination of history's progress. Many influential historical and contemporary figures have therefore been alleged to be part of a cabal that operates through many front organizations to orchestrate significant political and financial events, ranging from causing systemic crises to pushing through controversial policies, at both national and international levels, as steps in an ongoing plot to achieve world domination.[3][4][5][6][7]

3. "Camp, Gregory S. (1997). Selling Fear: Conspiracy Theories and End-Times Paranoia. Commish Walsh. ASIN B000J0N8NC.
4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Berlet, Chip; Lyons, Matthew N. (2000). Right-Wing Populism in America: Too Close for Comfort. Guilford Press. ISBN 1-57230-562-2.
5. ^ Jump up to:a b Goldberg, Robert Alan (2001). Enemies Within: The Culture of Conspiracy in Modern America. Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-09000-5.
6.^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z Barkun, Michael (2003). A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America. University of California Press; 1 edition. ISBN 0-520-23805-2.
7.^ Jump up to:a b Fenster, Mark (2008). Conspiracy 7.) 7. Theories: Secrecy and Power in American Culture (2nd ed.). University of Minnesota Press. ISBN 978-0-8166-5494-9.

And verify it with other reliable sources:

Multiple sources label the belief of globalists forming a one world totalitarian government as a conspiracy theory

New World Order

Why is "New World Order" ideology spreading? - CBS News

50 Years of Conspiracy Theories - New World Order -- New York Magazine - Nymag

History's greatest conspiracy theories

New World Order Conspiracies I: The New World Order and the Illuminati - California Scholarship

It is a reasonable quick source for general information, but should not be used for serious research on a topic.

Agreed.

So what serious sources do you use for evidence in support for globalists plotting to use COVID-19 in order to establish a one world, totalitarian government?

I will say it again.
The efforts of the World Federalist Association cannot be a "conspiracy theory".
Based on definition 5 from the source I gave you these people are conspiring to bring about a one world government. It cannot be a "theory" because they have admitted they are working toward this goal.

Therefore, your efforts to label the video of Walter Cronkite at the World Federalists meeting as a "conspiracy theory" cannot be a true assessment of reality.
I do understand why many people do not want to admit this truth, even when they see it with their own eyes.

New World Order definition:

"A new or alternative model of social organization, interaction, or control; (Politics) a new balance of power among nations, sometimes as manifested in arrangements established internationally for preserving political stability; especially (in recent use) the state of global politics and the global economy following the end of the Cold War." (New World Order | Definition of New World Order by Oxford Dictionary on Lexico.com also meaning of New World Order)

This definition fits the position of the world federalist movement:

"Our objective is a world order in which the legitimate rights of nations to self-determination are balanced by and consistent with the collective rights of the global community to protect and advance the common good of humanity. Our objective is to have not only governments but individuals recognize their obligation to uphold and affirm world law through allegiance to these institutions. It is the citizen who is finally the rightful source and subject of the authority of world law. Individuals, whether heads of government or ordinary citizens, must be accountable under due process of world law for crimes against humanity." (https://www.wfm-igp.org/)

So no, I don't believe the video itself is a conspiracy theory, nor did I label it as such.

My position is that to spin this video as evidence for globalists attempting to establish a one world totalitarian government fits the very idea of the new world order conspiracy theory.

Thus I believe your position of a future one world totalitarian government is based on a conspiracy theory, and not the position of the world federalists organization as posted on their website.

Most people aren't even aware of the controversies and scandals regarding Wikipedia. As with our government/corporate controlled mainstream media (i.e. propaganda), it's anything but a neutral and objective source of information people think it is.

Wikipedia: A Disinformation Operation?

In high school and college we were educated to never use wikipedia as a citation in research due to the sites credibility issues. While it may be a good starting point, most "facts" on wiki should be cross referenced with other legitimate sources.

Who are the "most people" who aren't even aware of this?

Can you demonstrate why the explanation given wikipedia on the new world order (conspiracy theory) is not the true explanation?

 

[TribulationSigns]

Yawning...

Debating over "one-world government" is a waste of time. The Bible teaches none of this! Blind leading the blind, I suppose.

 

[BABerean2]

And verify it with other reliable sources:

Multiple sources label the belief of globalists forming a one world totalitarian government as a conspiracy theory

Would you accept the word "conspiracy" when a globalist admits it below?


A quote from David Rockefeller's book:

.

 

[claninja]

Would you accept the word "conspiracy" when a globalist admits it below?


A quote from David Rockefeller's book:

.

Yes, as conspiring and conspiracy theory have 2 different definitions.

Being a Rockefeller ain't what it used to be as John D's only

https://www.washingtonpost.com/arch...mission/59c48198-9479-4c80-a70a-a1518b5bcfff/

But again, back to the OP, what strong evidence from reputable sources do you have that supports globalists using covid-19 as a means to establish a one world totalitarian government?

 

[BABerean2]

But again, back to the OP, what strong evidence from reputable sources do you have that supports globalists using covid-19 as a means to establish a one world totalitarian government?

So far we have seen there is a "conspiracy" to bring about a one world government, based on the words of the conspirators.
It is not a "theory", because those promoting the idea have admitted it in their own words.


What would you consider to be "reputable sources"?


.

 

[The Righterzpen]

According to whose opinion? Not this article you posted.

From the last paragraph of the article you provided the link to:

"An interesting question is the origin of the furin cleavage site it SARS-CoV-2. Its closest relative, the bat isolate RaTG13, does not have this site. Nor do any of the other bat SARS-like CoVs or the pangolin CoVs that have been isolated. However recently a newly isolated bat SARS-like CoV, RmYN02, was shown to contain a poly basic amino acid insertion in the spike glycoprotein. This observation supports the hypothesis that the furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 arose by recombination among bat viruses in nature."



How did this happen naturally? Zoonotic disease are common, which requires mutation to go from animals to humans.

"Zoonotic diseases are very common, both in the United States and around the world. Scientists estimate that more than 6 out of every 10 known infectious diseases in people can be spread from animals, and 3 out of every 4 new or emerging infectious diseases in people come from animals. Because of this, CDC works 24/7 to protect people from zoonotic diseases in the United States and around the world." (Zoonotic Diseases | One Health | CDC)


Here are several hypotheses for how this can happen naturally, which the author of the articles believes surmounts the argument of man made in the laboratory.

The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2

Again, the scientific consensus is that this is not a GOF and/or escapee from a lab, as demonstrated by one of the first articles you shared.

And yet, I'm not the only one to raise this question. Scientists themselves raise this question; because they know GOF research is happening.

Then of course, this brings up the question of what really is a "reputable source" of whether or not this is or isn't happening? The Lancet" which is a very well respect medical publication just recently had to retract a publication alleging hydroxychoriquin to be dangerous in connection to treatment for Covid 19.

So yeah, the political issues spill into the supposedly "neutral reputable sources".

And at that point, it ends up boiling down to "people believe what they want"; (partially because the truth is so hard to find).

Personally, I'm suspicious simply because of all the political infighting going on here. This virus clearly has political issues attached to it; especially noticeable here in the US.

So when I look at all the evidence; I see that yes, there is strong "circumstantial evidence" that this did come from a lab; even in absence of the publication of "the smoking gun". And of course the "reputable sources" aren't going to come out and say that because as soon as they do; they loose their "reputation". They loose their funding. These scientists loose their jobs.

So thus "reputable" comes to mean nothing.

Yet, looking at patterns of evidence in history past, it is well known that "conspiracy theories" that people suspected, did turn out to be true. Way back in WWI; people suspected the sinking of the Lusitania was a "set up". We know now that they were correct. We know the White House knew of plans to bomb Pearl Harbor before that happened. Look at the footage of 9/11 and then listen to the narrative they are telling you. They don't match. History is full of these types of contradictions. Covid 19 is no exception.

So the question to you becomes; that even if you don't believe (or want to believe) this virus was created in a lab; are you willing to admit that possibility is there?

 

[claninja]

So far we have seen there is a "conspiracy" to bring about a one world government, based on the words of the conspirators.

Technically no. You have provided videos and quotes on men who promote a new world order based on the following definition:

New World Order definition

"A new or alternative model of social organization, interaction, or control; (Politics) a new balance of power among nations, sometimes as manifested in arrangements established internationally for preserving political stability; especially (in recent use) the state of global politics and the global economy following the end of the Cold War." (New World Order | Definition of New World Order by Oxford Dictionary on Lexico.com also meaning of New World Order)

This definition fits the position of the world federalist movement:

"Our objective is a world order in which the legitimate rights of nations to self-determination are balanced by and consistent with the collective rights of the global community to protect and advance the common good of humanity. Our objective is to have not only governments but individuals recognize their obligation to uphold and affirm world law through allegiance to these institutions. It is the citizen who is finally the rightful source and subject of the authority of world law. Individuals, whether heads of government or ordinary citizens, must be accountable under due process of world law for crimes against humanity." (https://www.wfm-igp.org/)

These are not the same as the new world order conspiracy theories that promote a covert or globalists agency bent on setting up a totalitarian one world government.

It is not a "theory", because those promoting the idea have admitted it in their own words.

They never admitted nor proposed a one world totalitarian government. Such is the spin put on these things by conspiracy theorists.

What would you consider to be "reputable sources"?

From: GALILEO@UGA Subject Guides: Finding Reliable Sources: What is a Reliable Source?

A reliable source is one that provides a thorough, well-reasoned theory, argument, discussion, etc. based on strong evidence.

Scholarly, peer-reviewed articles or books -written by researchers for students and researchers. Original research, extensive bibliography. Found in GALILEO's academic databases and Google Scholar. Anatomy of a Scholarly Article.

Trade or professional articles or books - written by practitioners in a field to impart practice-oriented information. Found in GALILEO databases. Some may also be found through Google or other search engine, but may require payment to see the full text. Beware of sources on the internet that look like trade/professional articles, but don't have reliable content.

Magazine articles, books and newspaper articles from well-established newspapers - written for a general audience by authors or journalists who have consulted reliable sources and vetted through an editor. These sources may provide some of their articles online for free. Newspapers and magazines often contain both researched news stories and editorial/opinion pieces that express the view of the writer. It is important to be able to distinguish between them! Beware of sources on the internet that look like reputable magazines, and newspapers, but don't have reliable content.

Websites and blogs - can be reliable or unreliable, hoaxes or sincere misinformation. Researchers and other experts often use blogs as a way to share their knowledge with the general public, but anyone with computer access can do so too, to further any agenda they want. It's up to you to evaluate the quality of what you find online. Online news sources are particularly notorious for false information. Professor Melissa Zimdars of Merrimack College put together a document called "False, Misleading, Clickbait-y, and/or Satirical 'News' Sources" to help you read news sources with a critical eye .

Wikipedia - some entries are reliable, some are not - it's up to you to evaluate. The authors are anonymous, so there's no way to determine their expertise, or the expertise of the Wikipedia editor who oversees the entry. Wikipedia editors will post warnings if they think the entry has weaknesses. Wikipedia entries tend to be conservative, reflecting traditional views over newer research.

 

[claninja]

And yet, I'm not the only one to raise this question. Scientists themselves raise this question; because they know GOF research is happening.

Of course, that's how science works. Form a hypothesis and follow the evidence. Currently the evidence points to natural and not lab grown.

Then of course, this brings up the question of what really is a "reputable source" of whether or not this is or isn't happening? The Lancet" which is a very well respect medical publication just recently had to retract a publication alleging hydroxychoriquin to be dangerous in connection to treatment for Covid 19.

So yeah, the political issues spill into the supposedly "neutral reputable sources".

Studies must be peer reviewed. That study was retracted because they were not able to peer review it.

"Our independent peer reviewers informed us that Surgisphere would not transfer the full dataset, client contracts, and the full ISO audit report to their servers for analysis as such transfer would violate client agreements and confidentiality requirements. As such, our reviewers were not able to conduct an independent and private peer review and therefore notified us of their withdrawal from the peer-review process." (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31324-6/fulltext)

And at that point, it ends up boiling down to "people believe what they want"; (partially because the truth is so hard to find).

I would agree. Not necessarily because the truth is hard to find, but because of 1.) Bias and 2.) world view

Personally, I'm suspicious simply because of all the political infighting going on here. This virus clearly has political issues attached to it; especially noticeable here in the US.

Since it is affecting so many people, how can it not become a political issue? Issues this big require government policies to be enacted. And depending on your world view, political entities will pander towards view points to get votes.

So the question to you becomes; that even if you don't believe (or want to believe) this virus was created in a lab; are you willing to admit that possibility is there?

I will admit it no more than aliens existing , the multiverse being a real thing, or AI eventually destroying the human race. Sure they are all possibilities. Can evidence change in favor or against all these topics? absolutely.

So in regards to the OP, what evidence do we have the globalists are using COVID-19 to setup a totalitarian one world government and its relation to the mark of the beast?

What scripture from the gospels and epistles clearly demonstrate a future one world totalitarian government that Christians are to watch out for?

 

[BABerean2]

What scripture from the gospels and epistles clearly demonstrate a future one world totalitarian government that Christians are to watch out for?

Are you suggesting the Book of Revelation should be excluded from the Bible?


Rev_20:3 And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.

Rev_20:8 And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea.

Rev 18:23 And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived.



How many of your "reputable sources" can pass the following test, written by the same man who recorded the Gospel of John, and the Book of Revelation?


2Jn 1:7 For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.
2Jn 1:8 Look to yourselves, that we lose not those things which we have wrought, but that we receive a full reward.
2Jn 1:9 Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.
2Jn 1:10 If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed:
2Jn 1:11 For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.


.