Is forced vaccination related to the mark of the beast?

[The Righterzpen]

Here is the only other place in the Bible that uses the number 666."

This is incorrect. 1 Kings 10:14 and 2 Chronicles 9:13 also use the number 666 and it has negative connotations regarding Solomon's apostasy. "The weight of gold that came to Solomon yearly was six hundred and sixty-six talents of gold" (NKJV)

Interesting, I'll go look this up. I did not find that when I had looked for six hundred and sixty six in the concordance.

Come to realize now; my "bad" for not looking up "six hundred threescore and six".

How did you come to the conclusion that 666 is Christ? This is the first time I've ever heard this exegesis. I read your article and it doesn't provide any clarity, insights, or anything convincing that 666 is Christ. Did you come to this conclusion based on your own personal interpretation? Or are there articles, books, or other sources you can refer us to that spell this out more clearly?

I came to the conclusion based on what I read in Scripture.

Excerpt from article:
So if 666 is a number from a census, what exactly does this mean?

The text of Revelation itself may actually give us the answer. The Greek in Revelation tells the wise to "calculate the (subtracted) number of the beast; the number of the man and that number is 666". The phrase "number of the man" is a definitive article. It is "the man" not "a man". So actually what the wise are instructed to do here is to calculate the number that is subtracted from the number of the beast. That number is the number of "the man" and his number is 666. Interesting huh!

In order to know that you are to "calculate the (subtracted) number of the beast" you have to take a good look at the Greek.

G5585 - psēphizō - Strong's Greek Lexicon (NKJV)

Now comparing this to the number (666) counted in Ezra; this tells you what you are actually counting.

So, these 666 are the descendants of a man named Adonikam. He is a descendant of king David and he has returned from Babylon with 666 descendants; three of which are named as Eliphelet, Jeiel and Shemaiah.

Interestingly Adonikam's name means "The Lord is raised".

Eliphelet means "God is deliverance".

Jeiel means "God lives".

Shemaiah means "Yahweh hears".

So if 666 is a number from a census, what exactly does this mean?

This passage in Ezra is telling you who you are counting out from the number of the beast. And the fact that the Greek in Revelation uses the article noun "The man" and not "a man"; gives indication that the person who's number is 666 is a single person who's separate from the beast. And since the 666 out of the Babylonian captivity is clear that these are descendants of David; what conclusion would you come to other than "the man" is Christ?

I also disagree with your "What Did He [Jesus] REALLY look like?" article. In reference to Isaiah 53:2-5 you write "these verses actually don't have anything to do with Jesus's physical description." Verse 2 clearly does: "He has no form or comeliness; And when we see Him, There is no beauty that we should desire Him." (NKJV)

If you take apart the Hebrew; no, it doesn't. The article explains the Hebrew to you.

Verse 2:

First off "he shall grow up" is a Hebrew tense that is an incomplete action. (He's never going to stop "growing up"; which doesn't make any sense in English, but when we translate the rest of the verse, it will make more sense.)

"as a sapling in the face of Him (God); as a root which originated all the way down at the foundation (not getting it's nourishment from the dry ground around it)."

"...which has no..." The Hebrew word "no" in this verse is most often translated as "nor", then "can not": thirdly most translated as "no", "never", "not", fourthly as "without" and then "surely".

"form"; which this word is derived from a root word meaning "inclination toward".

"honorable", "majestic", "respected" or "splendorous" - "adornment".

"That when we see / saw / looked upon him, there were no attributes (of physical, charisma or any other "qualification") that would cause us to be pleased with; (as in desire to exalt or praise) him.

Now the next verse explains "why" (or rather people's perception of him based primarily on life circumstance.

He shall continue to spring up as a sapling in the face of Him, as a root in dry ground nourished from the Foundation; surely never with an inclination toward honored majesty. For when we see him, we recognize no qualifying attributes we would desire to exhalt him for.

Yet if you think about it; you'd have to ask yourself what would Jesus's physical appearance have anything to do with fulfillment of Scripture? He wasn't a tall stately looking person. Matter of fact, anthropologically speaking (if He fell within the statistical norm of 1st century Jewish males) He probably wasn't any taller than maybe about 5 foot 3 inches and weighed more than 130lbs.

This passage has nothing to do with how "unattractive" He may have seemed from a "reproductive specimen" vanish point. I'm sure Jesus was pretty average looking. We know from the passage about His arrest that Judas has to point out who He is. Meaning He looked like everyone else. So no, He wouldn't have been more (or less) attractive than your typical Galilean male.

That passage doesn't mean He was ugly, it just means He was average.

 

[The Righterzpen]

This is incorrect. 1 Kings 10:14 and 2 Chronicles 9:13 also use the number 666 and it has negative connotations regarding Solomon's apostasy. "The weight of gold that came to Solomon yearly was six hundred and sixty-six talents of gold" (NKJV)

I just looked these up. Yes it is 666 talents of gold whom King Solomon receives in a year.

Who is Solomon a picture of? (Not Satan or an "anti-christ"!)

So if the 666 talents of gold belong to Solomon "the man"; again, it would have to be Christ!

Thanks for the info; I'll have to put it in my study.

I'll look at the other two links you posted too.

 

[The Righterzpen]

Theologia » What is the Worth of 666 Talents of Gold?
Significance of Solomon's 666 talents of gold?
etc, etc.

Just read these links. They are interesting, but I think they miss something about Solomon and how he is a picture of Christ.

One of the articles talks about Solomon disobeying God by multiplying horses, wives and wealth. Yet let's consider for a moment the context of redemption.

Who's kingdom does God "get" believers from? (The parable about binding the strong man so one can plunder his house.) Satan is the strong man who's bound so his kingdom is plundered of those who'd otherwise be condemned for their sin.

Now here's where we run into issues with dispensationalism.

Scripture speaks of Satan being bound; now when did that happen? The end of Ephesians 1 tells us all dominion and power is given to Christ at the resurrection.

Ephesians 1:
19 And what is the exceeding greatness of his power to us-ward who believe, according to the working of his mighty power,

20 Which he wrought in Christ, when he raised him from the dead, and set him at his own right hand in the heavenly places,

21 Far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come:

22 And hath put all things under his feet, and gave him to be the head over all things to the church,

So let's go back to Solomon for a minute. He enmassed all these wives and horses and wealth from the kingdoms around him. (Who's kingdom does Christ plunder.) Upon Solomon's "death" comes the destruction of his kingdom. Now in terms of redemption, if Jesus had never risen from the dead; the show would have been over. We wouldn't be here to even discuss this because if Christ had not succeeded; His death would have precipitated the destruction of the cosmos.

So in Solomon's "death" after having "plundered" all these kingdoms; is this giving us a pictorial representation of the "church age" and the end of the world?

Scripture speaks of Solomon being wise; and note how he'd obtained the glory he'd obtained for his kingdom. He didn't do so through military assault. No, he was much more "covert" about it. Is not the gospel much more covert as to how Christ plunders satan's kingdom?

So again, the 666 talents of gold, obtained by King Solomon; who's a picture of Christ!

 

[lamb7]

There is so much online about this Vax being the "Mark"

We don't know what the "Mark" is yet. I think we will know when it is time, and it won't be a mystery. God is not the author of confusion. Read The Word Of God for insight and limit youtube videos, and other people pushing this idea.

Lets Look into The Book Of Revelation SEE Revelation verse below for context of the MARK people always quote Rev 13:16 onward, they never give the context and the verses before Rev 13:16 -> the mark of the beast verse. After reading the WORD of GOD I feel much peace on these matters.


REV 13 KJV 11 And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.

12 And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.

13 And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,

14 And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.

15 And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.

16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

From reading that it seems that those who do not worship the image of the beast WILL NOT EVEN get an opportunity to take the "mark" as they will be killed for NOT worshiping the image of the beast.

You notice those making videos and articles on END TIMES rarely speak of the Gospel and how to be saved? That is not as "Click Bait" worthy as the End Times stuff. Test the spirits always. God Bless.

 

[lamb7]

The mark of the beast is about worship .... not a vaccine.

Revelation 13:15

Berean Study Bible
The second beast was permitted to give breath to the image of the first beast, so that the image could speak and cause all who refused to worship it to be killed.

Yes those who don't worship that image of the beast won't even have a chance to take the "mark" since they will be killed for NOT worshiping the image whatever worship is in that context I am not sure exactly.

The mark of the beast verse is after that. People always quote Rev 13:16 onward, they never give the context and the verses before Rev 13:16 -> the mark of the beast verse. After reading the WORD of GOD I feel much peace on these matters.

 

[Timtofly]

You didn't catch that it's the same number in Ezra; did you?

This fellow left the Babylonian captivity with 666 descendants. This was recorded as part of his genealogy. (Note; he's a descendent of David.)

What does Revelation tell you to do? It tells you to "calculate" the number taken out of the number of the beast. The calculated out number is "the number of The Man".

Back in Ezra you have a census number. You have the same thing in Revelation. Who is "The Man" who's number is subtracted from the number of the beast? Those who don't have the mark on their foreheads. (Why? - Because they have their Father's name on their foreheads.)

666 is a census number of those rescued out of the Babylonian captivity; by a fellow who's a descendent of David.

(If this doesn't start "ringing bells"; it should.)

"The Man" who's number is 666 is Christ. That's what the book of Ezra explains to us. 666 is not the "mark of the beast". It's the number that's subtracted out from those who bear the mark of the beast.



You didn't read the link to the study I posted did you?



Ezra is linked to the passage in Jeremiah, where the servants of God are the ones who go through the city and slay the wicked who are bemoaning their Babylonian idols.

The Bible is its own dictionary, commentary and interpreter. You want to know what 666 means, you're going to find the answer in the Scripture.

It is the number of the first Adam, not the second Adam. It has to do with the economy of labor, work. The Bible states if a man does not work, a man should not eat. Adam was cursed and his descendants with 6k years of labor, 6 days a week, 6 hours a day. That is going to end soon. Any who still want to work past the end date, will be branded with the curse eternally, and spend the rest of their existence in the lake of fire.

 

[The Righterzpen]

It is the number of the first Adam, not the second Adam. It has to do with the economy of labor, work. The Bible states if a man does not work, a man should not eat. Adam was cursed and his descendants with 6k years of labor, 6 days a week, 6 hours a day. That is going to end soon. Any who still want to work past the end date, will be branded with the curse eternally, and spend the rest of their existence in the lake of fire.

???

Except the Scripture doesn't say "6000 years", or "6 hours a day". I work a lot more than 6 hours a day!

And if you add up the years of the patriarchs end on end with the exception of "X begot Y and called his name...." you get a planet that's more than twice 6000 years old.

The genealogies in Genesis aren't all direct father son relations. Matter of fact, most of them aren't. This can be proven by comparing the genealogies in Genesis to the genealogy of Jesus in Luke. There's an extra "Cainan" in Luke that's not in Genesis. He's between Arphaxad and Salah who are the descendants of Shem.

And if you believe the Scripture is inerrant, than that wasn't a "typo".

That is going to end soon. Any who still want to work past the end date, will be branded with the curse eternally, and spend the rest of their existence in the lake of fire.

????

 

[Heavenhome]

The point is that Christ Will tell you directly anything you need to know pertaining to the subject provided you are safely in Christ.

Thanks for the reply.
Yes, I agree as I said the same thing in a previous post.
I just didn't understand the answer you gave whilst quoting the post I made on the pastor in the film clip.

 

[lsume]

Thanks for the reply.
Yes, I agree as I said the same thing in a previous post.
I just didn't understand the answer you gave whilst quoting the post I made on the pastor in the film clip.

I hope someone will be led to Christ through anything that is posted. There was no slight intended.

 

[The Righterzpen]

I hope someone will be led to Christ through anything that is posted. There was no slight intended.

Well Scripture says God's word doesn't return void; so there's some profit in this conversation; even if it just serves to strengthen people who are already believers.

 

[Timtofly]

???

Except the Scripture doesn't say "6000 years", or "6 hours a day". I work a lot more than 6 hours a day!

And if you add up the years of the patriarchs end on end with the exception of "X begot Y and called his name...." you get a planet that's more than twice 6000 years old.

The genealogies in Genesis aren't all direct father son relations. Matter of fact, most of them aren't. This can be proven by comparing the genealogies in Genesis to the genealogy of Jesus in Luke. There's an extra "Cainan" in Luke that's not in Genesis. He's between Arphaxad and Salah who are the descendants of Shem.

And if you believe the Scripture is inerrant, than that wasn't a "typo".



????

Revelation is not about you. Revelation is about God and God's plan with this creation. There is no way to prove that known written, and archeological human history is longer than 6000 years. We are not going by assumed earth age. Do you choose the Egyptian list of kings over the Bible and archeology? Do you assume God lied about the Flood, and trust human assumption, it was only local?

I am not sure why you refuse to acknowledge that humans can live for over 1000 years. Even so, does not mean that the world needs to be millions of years old. Satan's deception over the church runs deeper than theology. Satan cannot deceive the church with theology. Satan can with what we teach our children about God's creation. In 2 Thessalonians 2, Paul claimed that even the church would be deceived. Not just apostasy, the church would never completely apostasize, but the church would be deceived and believe one lie. The Word of God has a specific creation account. It also specifies this reality consist of 8000 years. It is clearly spelled out in Scripture. Peter claimed we should not be ignorant of God's time keeping. Paul warned us not to be deceived. John in Revelation sets out the key in both a figurative and literal witness.

 

[The Righterzpen]

Revelation is not about you

And what makes you assume that I think it's about me?

Revelation is about God and God's plan with this creation.

And if you are going to correctly interpret Revelation, you are going to find the answer somewhere else in the Bible.

And by the way; Revelation isn't about "God's plan with the creation". Revelation; (like the rest of Scripture) is about the death, burial and resurrection of Christ!

There is no way to prove that known written, and archeological human history is longer than 6000 years.

No, you can prove it out of the Scripture though.

We are not going by assumed earth age.

You assume it's only 6000 years old. That idea comes from James Ussher who lived in the 1600's. Ussher had some major errors in his calculations though. One was that he'd said Israel was only in Egypt 250 years when Scripture itself says they were there 430 years.

You have no proof earth is only 6000 years old. Matter of fact, if you were to line up the patriarchs ages end on end; except for where the text says "and called his name"; you'd have a cosmos that's a little over 13,000 years old. Earth was 13,000 years old in 1988 AD.

Do you choose the Egyptian list of kings over the Bible and archeology?

Why do you assume what I believe without actually asking me?

Do you assume God lied about the Flood, and trust human assumption, it was only local?

What makes you assume I'm ignorant of Bible history?

Even so, does not mean that the world needs to be millions of years old

What makes you assume that I think the world is millions of years old?

Satan's deception over the church runs deeper than theology. Satan cannot deceive the church with theology.

Oh yeah he can! Satan uses bad theology to deceive people all the time. Lots of denominations are filled with bad theology.

Paul claimed that even the church would be deceived. Not just apostasy, the church would never completely apostasize, but the church would be deceived and believe one lie

And what "one lie" is that; Darwinian evolution? And what makes you assume I'm a Darwinian evolutionist?

PS - I'm not.

The Word of God has a specific creation account. It also specifies this reality consist of 8000 years. It is clearly spelled out in Scripture.

If what you says is true; then it's on you to prove it from Scripture.

 

[Timtofly]

And what makes you assume that I think it's about me?
And if you are going to correctly interpret Revelation, you are going to find the answer somewhere else in the Bible.

And by the way; Revelation isn't about "God's plan with the creation". Revelation; (like the rest of Scripture) is about the death, burial and resurrection of Christ!



No, you can prove it out of the Scripture though.
You assume it's only 6000 years old. That idea comes from James Ussher who lived in the 1600's. Ussher had some major errors in his calculations though. One was that he'd said Israel was only in Egypt 250 years when Scripture itself says they were there 430 years.

You have no proof earth is only 6000 years old. Matter of fact, if you were to line up the patriarchs ages end on end; except for where the text says "and called his name"; you'd have a cosmos that's a little over 13,000 years old. Earth was 13,000 years old in 1988 AD.
Why do you assume what I believe without actually asking me?
What makes you assume I'm ignorant of Bible history?
What makes you assume that I think the world is millions of years old?
Oh yeah he can! Satan uses bad theology to deceive people all the time. Lots of denominations are filled with bad theology.

And what "one lie" is that; Darwinian evolution? And what makes you assume I'm a Darwinian evolutionist?

PS - I'm not.

If what you says is true; then it's on you to prove it from Scripture.

You said you work more than 6 hours a day.

If the earth is 13,000 years, then you have to prove it in the Bible. (Adding up ages is not proof). There is only about 2000 years between the fall and Abraham. Because of Ishmael, Abraham's family with Isaac had to wait 600 years. Between the destruction of Jericho and the Cross was 1400 years. If you can prove Abraham was not born 500 years after the Flood, and the Flood was not 1500 years after Adam was banned from the Garden, then show me the proof. The Egyptians claim their kingdom went back 10,000 years prior to any Flood. They do not specify when a Flood came. Their kingdom histories were the most studied and mapped out by western archeology. Also older and more continous than even Persia, Iraq, and India. Chinese archeology may be more exact, but was never opened to the western world like the ME has been.

I do not have to prove anything. This is not about me.

 

[claninja]

If Walter Cronkite and others have openly stated they want to bring about a one world government, and that the United States may have to give up some of its sovereignty in the process, I will take them at their word.
It is not a conspiracy "theory", because it is a fact.

World Government is about "control".

During 1913 the Rothschilds, and others took control of the money system of the United States through the Federal Reserve Act. Read the book "The Creature From Jekyll Island" if you want to understand how conspirators work together to accomplish their goals. This is not a "theory" because those involved later admitted they had pretended to go on a hunting trip in order to have this secret meeting to plan the Federal Reserve System. It is not Federal, and there are no reserves. For most of my lifetime they could take one dollar into the system, and then loan out ten. If they loaned one of those dollars to another bank, they in turn could loan out ten. This is the classic pyramid scheme.
They are now ignoring the fractional reserve limit. What happens to all pyramid schemes sooner or later? It is a mathematical certainty.

There are very powerful people in the world who are Baal worshipers.
Can you explain why a pyramid with the all-seeing eye is on the back of the one dollar bill?

Every time they print money out of thin air it steals money out of my bank account, through the process of inflation.
We see below what God thinks about this corruption of our money system.


Lev_19:36 Just balances, just weights, a just ephah, and a just hin, shall ye have: I am the LORD your God, which brought you out of the land of Egypt.

Deu_25:13 Thou shalt not have in thy bag divers weights, a great and a small.

Pro_16:11 A just weight and balance are the LORD'S: all the weights of the bag are his work.

Pro_20:10 Divers weights, and divers measures, both of them are alike abomination to the LORD.

Pro_20:23 Divers weights are an abomination unto the LORD; and a false balance is not good.

Mic_6:11 Shall I count them pure with the wicked balances, and with the bag of deceitful weights?


Do you want these same people to control all of our freedoms, or should we trust them when they talk about global peace?
How many of these people are Christians? If they are not, you need to read 2 John 1:7-11 very carefully.

Can you explain what will happen to the economy of the United States, if this COVID-19 emergency continues, and the Federal Government continues to print money out of nothing?


Eze 33:6 But if the watchman see the sword come, and blow not the trumpet, and the people be not warned; if the sword come, and take any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at the watchman's hand.


Century of Enslavement: History of the Federal Reserve

.

You are just spraying all different kinds of theories at me, which you haven't tied to the OP, nor does it answered my question.

What reputable sources are you using to attribute globalists using COVID-19 to forming a 1 world government?

If you don't have any reputable sources then I'll take the advice of Paul:

1 Timothy 2:23 Have nothing to do with foolish, ignorant controversies; you know that they breed quarrels.

 

[claninja]

And neither are humanly invented health crisis disasters. How much do you know about chemical and biological warfare in Desert Storm?

So you believe COVID-19 a is human invented crisis disaster? What reputable sources are you using to come to this conclusion?

 

[The Righterzpen]

I do not have to prove anything. This is not about me.

Really?

If the earth is 13,000 years, then you have to prove it in the Bible. (Adding up ages is not proof).

How about some simple math? (Do you agree that the laws of math don't change?)

There is only about 2000 years between the fall and Abraham.

???? If there were 2000 years between the fall and Abraham, when was the flood? You can't even get 2000 years between Adam and the flood. Remember, everyone who wasn't in the ark died in the flood!

Get out your calculator and check my math! This is even according to your age of the earth belief system. (This is not even adding up the ages of the patriarchs end on end except where the text says "and called his name".) Even if we "tweaked it" your way it's at least 6000 years between Adam and the birth of Christ! Which according to you, earth is now 8000 years old!

Adam - 130 years to Seth - lived 930 years
“called his name” Seth -105 years to Enos - lived 912 years
(912 + 130 = 1042 years have passed)

Enos: - 90 years to Cainan - lived 905 years
(912 - 905 + 90 = 97 + 1042 = 1139 years have passed)

Cainan: is 70 years to Mahaleleel - lived 910
(910 - 905 + 70 = 75 + 1139 = 1214 years have passed)

Mahalaleel - 65 years to Jared - lived 895 years
(910 - 895 + 65 = 1294 years have passed

Jared: - 162 to Enoch - lived 962 years
(962 - 895 +162 + 1294 = 1523 years have passed

Enoch: - 65 years to Methuselah - lived 365 years
(962 - 365 + 65 = 662. This produces a negative number from 1523 years seeing how Methuselah outlives Enoch by 307 years.)

Methuselah - 187 years to Lamech - lived 969 years
(1523 - 662 = 861 + 307 = (year) 1168 as the year Methuselah is born. Methuselah lives 969 years = 2137 years have passed. This means Methuselah died in the flood at 832 years old, when the Scripture says he was 969 years old.

Lamech - 182 years to Noah - lived 770 years
(1168 + 187 = (year) 1355 + 770 = (year) 2125. (770 - 125 = 645) Meaning Lamech was 645 when the flood came, which also means Lamech died in the flood. When Scripture clearly says he was 770 years old when he died.

“called his name” Noah. Noah was 500 years old when flood started (770 - 182 = 588 years have passed from Noah’s birth to Lamech’s death; yet the flood started when Noah was 500 years old?

Your time table doesn't add up!

We are still 10 generations from Noah to Abraham according to Genesis and 11 generations from Noah to Abraham according to Luke.

It's 2000 years from Abraham to Jesus and now 2000 years from Jesus. There's no way there's 2000 years from the fall to Abraham. The math just doesn't work dude!

 

[The Righterzpen]

So you believe COVID-19 a is human invented crisis disaster? What reputable sources are you using to come to this conclusion?

Do a google search on "bat coronaviruses" and "gain of function research". You'll actually find the research papers on Internet medical sites.

 

[claninja]

Do a google search on "bat coronaviruses" and "gain of function research". You'll actually find the research papers on Internet medical sites.

This didn't answer my questions, so I'll as again.


So you believe COVID-19 a is human invented crisis disaster? What reputable sources are you using to come to this conclusion?

 

[The Righterzpen]

This didn't answer my questions, so I'll as again.


So you believe COVID-19 a is human invented crisis disaster? What reputable sources are you using to come to this conclusion?

You want me to give you links to the research papers?

The virus is real. They created a real pandemic. In 6 months so far there have been more than 1 million deaths. We can make a good educated guess on this based on how many deaths globally are unaccounted for above and beyond the average death stats of any given nation.

I believe there's likely more than one "Covid 19 virus" out there. Not just different strands of the same virus. Because something like 30% of people who present to the medical system as obviously being ill with symptoms consistent with Covid 19 (including other documented medical tests like elevated D-dimer and ground glass opacities on the CT scan) yet test negative.

I am one of those stats. The VA sent me to the ER twice in the beginning of March. I had the cough, chest pain, shortness of breath, fever, diarrhea and a real good case of brain fog for about 4 days. I was sick for about 6 weeks. Ran a fever for 7 weeks. I still have medical problems 6 months later. My blood cell counts are off and now I have this really obnoxious rash that no one is really sure what it is.

I'm not saying this pandemic is fake. I'm saying it came about from one of humanities finest hours of collective stupidity!

 

[claninja]

You want me to give you links to the research papers?

Yes, as someone who is a medical professional and trained in evaluating medical research, I would like to evaluate the sources you are using.

The virus is real.

I agree.

They created a real pandemic.

Who is they?

I believe there's likely more than one "Covid 19 virus" out there. Not just different strands of the same virus.

You mean like cold, flu, and noroviruses?

I'm not saying this pandemic is fake. I'm saying it came about from one of humanities finest hours of collective stupidity!

This is generic, I don't know what you mean.

Collective stupidity as in not properly preparing for a pandemic?