• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

photo scanner, negatives and slides

Dave G.

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2017
4,680
5,350
75
Sandiwich
✟381,947.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
Anyone have a recommendation for a photo flatbed scanner that can also copy negatives and slides? Dealing with sticker shock .Think Flatbed is what is needed
Wow, I've been out of that for probably ten years now if not longer. At that I scanned mostly medium format so the negatives were big. But todays flatbeds are double the resolution with much better dynamic range for 2/3 the price we paid. I would just go read reviews, join a photo forum and ask questions. I bet there is a fairly affordable option for you in a flatbed depending what you want to do with it. I mean we did reprints with less lol. 35mm film was a bit tough to print any size from but the scans themselves for screen viewing weren't bad. I'm sure it's better today. Prints have never been a problem to scan if the prints are decent. I've done many enlargements from print scans fwiw.... And those were lower res scanners than these days.

It can be kind of a hobby in itself really if you like that sort of thing and willing to put some time into learning......
 
Upvote 0

Dave G.

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2017
4,680
5,350
75
Sandiwich
✟381,947.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
Appreciate your input. Thanks.
I wish I could say more, I was well versed in it in my time lol. Things have changed, I took a quick look at an Epson scanner and noticed the pertinent numbers seemed to be at least double what we used ( res alone is 6000x 9000dpi or so in the unit I looked at, we used 3200 for instance). Maybe watch some of the videos on the Epson Perfection V600. See what you think about that one. There are a few good review articles out there too if you prefer reading. We used the Epson 3200, I'm reasonably sure things have only improved since then, heck I no sooner bought it and there was a better model out !.

With prints there is also something to said in photographing them with today's high res digital cameras, that was just coming in when I got out..
 
Upvote 0

eleos1954

God is Love
Site Supporter
Nov 14, 2017
11,029
6,446
Utah
✟857,469.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

Daniel Marsh

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2015
9,867
2,673
Livingston County, MI, US
✟218,041.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0