• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

How do we make sustainable environments? Is "Evolution" always the most applicable?

pitabread

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2017
12,920
13,373
Frozen North
✟344,333.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
I wouldn't go so far as to advocate denying any law abiding citizen a gun. However, I wouldn't sell a gun to a minority. It's just a personal preference.

You do realize that "preference" sounds racist, yes?
 
Upvote 0

Ophiolite

Recalcitrant Procrastinating Ape
Nov 12, 2008
9,331
10,206
✟289,196.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
You do realize that "preference" sounds racist, yes?


And yet he seems blissfully unaware, or indifferent to the charge. Almost as if it was the most natural position to take.

Of course, evolution has rendered distrust of the "stranger who looks different" a sound survival approach. What OWG seems to have missed out on is the use of rational thought - another evolutionary winner - to analyse (and readily discard) the intuitive dislikes and stereotypical judgements that come with the simplistic "stranger bad" approach.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Speedwell
Upvote 0

FrumiousBandersnatch

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2009
15,405
8,144
✟356,992.00
Faith
Atheist
Of course, evolution has rendered distrust of the "stranger who looks different" a sound survival approach. What OWG seems to have missed out on is the use of rational thought - another evolutionary winner - to analyse (and readily discard) the intuitive dislikes and stereotypical judgements that come with the simplistic "stranger bad" approach.
Alternatively, one could see it as a member of an oppressing majority being reluctant to risk a member of an oppressed minority gaining the potential to reduce the inequality, in case they think the way he does...
 
Upvote 0