Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Some folks will just settle for immortality.![]()
LOLBtw, what happened to the 'r', Der Alte?
...I do not address those who would pervert the right ways of the Lord, using God's gracious plan and His great mercy as an excuse for careless living or unconcern for lost men, but to those children of the Most High God who, seeing their infinite identity in Christ, are consumed with the holy passion of becoming the very instrument of God to fight the good fight of faith, destroying sin and death and hell, and bringing all men back into the loving embrace of their God and Redeemer. So be it!
John 9:4-5
4 I must work the works of him that sent me, while it is day: the night cometh, when no man can work.
5 As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world.
So you would agree with the following remark, eh:
Would you like to add some more to that list of UR verses? Such as any from the following lists:
Unique Proof For Christian, Biblical Universalism
75 UR verses + 100 proofs + 150 reasons etc:
Web Online Help
213 Questions Without Answers:
Questions Without Answers
How Scripture expresses endless duration (not aion/ios) (paradise, hell, punishment) - Christianity - - City-Data Forum
I'll be waiting forever for any that say anyone will "never be saved".
Jesus didn't use the best words & expressions to describe endlessness in regards to punishment, because He didn't believe in endless punishment.
ENDLESSNESS not applied to eschatological PUNISHMENT in Scripture:
could an 'eternal punishment' simply mean that once instituted it will not change?
12 points re forever and ever (literally to/into "the ages of the ages") being finite:
For the Lord will NOT cast off FOR EVER:
Of course fear can be corrective.
Punishment can be corrective.
The first two failed in an internet search. The third makes no reference to corrective punishment of criminals or saints, which can be rehabilitative, but to:
"Definition
- an admonishing or calling to soundness of mind, to moderation and self-control
- self-control, moderation"
You have responded before and I have replied before. You are entitled to your opinion and as usual quote a verse here and a verse there but nothing refutes anything I posted.ClementofA said:I have responded to you before re that passage and, as usual, don't expect you to reply to what i've said:
Here is the next verse of the context, telling us what kind of "works" are being referred to:
Jn.9:6 When he had thus spoken, he spat on the ground, and made clay of the spittle, and he anointed the eyes of the blind man with the clay,
John 9:4-5 speaks of night (which is when it gets dark). Compare:
Mt.27:45 Now from the sixth hour there was darkness over all the land unto the ninth hour.
Was Jesus laying hands on - or did He "anoint" (Jn.9:6) - any blind, sick or lame people when on the cross in darkness? Were His 12 apostles?
Compare: "Day signifies Jesus Messianic ministry, and the night refers to the Crucifixion" (NKJV note at Jn.9:4, see url below):
and
"Day signifies Jesus Messianic ministry, and the night refers to the Crucifixion" (NIV note at Jn.9:4, see url below):
Heb.10:28 A man that hath set at nought Moses' law dieth without compassion on the word of two or three witnesses: 29 of how much sorer punishment, think ye, shall he be judged worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
Stoning to death is not a very sore or long lasting punishment. People suffered far worse deaths via the torture methods of the eternal hell believing Medieval Inquisitionists and the German Nazis under Hitler.
Therefore, if the writer of Hebrews believed that wicked, rebellious, Christ rejectors would be punished with something so monstrous as being endlessly annihilated or tormented, he would not have chosen to compare their punishment to something so lame as being stoned to death.
Clearly he did not believe Love Omnipotent is an unfeeling terminator machine or sadist who abandons forever the beings He created in His own image & likeness so easily...
It seems not (see above) & my previous post addressed this:
Paideia is used in the NT for the instruction, training & discipline of children, namely those of God.
"Definition...the rearing of a child, training, discipline" (NAS concordance).
"Now it’s true that Hymenaeus and Alexander were once believers, but they made shipwreck of their faith! There were no longer believers. Until Paul handed them over to Satan for chastisement, they were doubtless impenitent as well. They were blaspheming!"
"Though unbelievers whom God sends to hell may be impenitent, they will become penitent after they are chastised, just as Paul expected Hymenaeus and Alexander to be after they received their chastisement from Satan."
"Meanwhile, your own attempt elsewhere to argue that {kolasis} means the same at both Matt 25 and 1 John 4, resulted in you eventually arguing that the term when used at 1 John 4 has nothing to do with hopeless punishment or even punishment from God at all, while still insisting that the same meaning must be applied at Matt 25 as at 1 John 4. (In order to avoid discussing the actual narrative and thematic contexts of the judgment there, which I went to the trouble to post in detail.)"
Well if Romans 5:18-19 were the only passage concerned withwho gets saved and how, it would make a fairly storng case for UR, but it isn't and when all the verses about salvation and eternity are included, your case falls apart..
Noli: this is exciting information! (lol)
What is the whole council of God in your new understanding?
Does especially = only?
Is the Author of the all, the Finisher of the all?
Does the whole of created life experience being set free from the bondage of sin, or only believers?
Is the Author of the all, the Finisher of the all?
Does the whole of created life experience being set free from the bondage of sin, or only believers?
Hebrews 12:11 King James Version (KJV)
11 Now no chastening (paideia) for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby.
Whoops, God seems disagrees with you
And if those in the lake of fire are his children, would he not wish to paideia them because He loves them???????????????????????????????????????
Well they still were believers , but that is another topic for another thread!
But if ou wish to use this argument than you sink your own argument! If they stopped being believers, then God is still chastening them as instruction WHILE ACCORDING TO YOU THEY ARE UNBELIEVERS! Not kolasis, not timera, not diorthosi, nor sophronismos or epanorthis.
Remember this is not killing them but while they are alive, handed over just like in Corinthians.
It seems you cannot see the forest for the trees! We are just referring to kolasis. Kolasis does not carry with it a time or length. It simply means punishment! aionios tells us that punishment will be neverending!
Unless of course you are going to stick to aidios meaning eternal and aionios is not. Matt. 25 if punishment is not everlasting, then life as well is not everlasting!
The Theos equation is quite clear. It is not about who gets saved, it defines the scope of those fallen in Adam1 being "made righteous."
Perhaps you should eliminate it along with ta pavnte and the whole of created life being delivered from the tyranny of change and decay!
So you believe every flea, microbe, bird, dog, cat etc. all will be in heaven?
Jonah 2:2These two verses (from the bottom of the post) tend to get overlooked in my presentation above in post #710
The gospel was preached to the dead (in the afterlife) so that they might be judged (in regard to the body) but LIVE in regard to the spirit. Christ died and was resurrected SO THAT he might be the Lord of both the DEAD and the living.
1 Peter 4:6
For this is the reason the gospel was preached even to those who are now dead,
so that they might be judged according to human standards in regard to the body,
but live according to God in regard to the spirit.
Romans 14:9
For this very reason, Christ died and returned to life so that
he might be the Lord of both the dead and the living.
You have responded before and I have replied before. You are entitled to your opinion and as usual quote a verse here and a verse there but nothing refutes anything I posted.
You are claiming that Jesus could not work at night when it was dark. Jesus said "night when no one can work." He certainly wasn't talking about men working in the night time because it is recorded that the disciples fished all night.
Matthew 14:25Jesus could work at night when it was dark. So in Jn 9:4 Jesus was not talking about nighttime on earth.
25 Shortly before dawn Jesus went out to them, walking on the lake.
Mark 6:48
48 He saw the disciples straining at the oars, because the wind was against them. Shortly before dawn he went out to them, walking on the lake. He was about to pass by them,
John 9:4 As long as it is day, we must do the works of him who sent me. Night is coming, when no one can work.
You are entitled to your opinion and as usual quote a verse here and a verse there but nothing refutes anything I posted.
Your first weak attempt failed now in desperation you try a different argument. I only had one argument which has NOT been disproved.ClementofA said:...An alternate interpretation is that "night" refers to "death" in "Night is coming, when no one can work" (John 9:4b). When people are in their graves dead, they are not working. Jesus' body wasn't working laying hands on any blind men while in the grave. However, after Jesus' body rose He appeared to & spoke to His disciples, preached to Saul who became the apostle Paul, is presently interceding for the saints, will yet raise the dead & reign in the millennium, etc. That sounds like a lot of works....
Your first weak attempt failed now in desperation you try a different argument. I only had one argument which has NOT been disproved.
Jesus did not say, or imply "night is coming when I cannot work but don't worry I'll be back." Jesus did not preach to Paul in the flesh. He said "no man can work" And those who have died cannot work.
Yet he used those same less than best words for eternal life and you are perfectly fine accepting them for life in heaven.
And you lord will not cast off- is for believers not unbelievers.
Remember Matt. 7, God has no relationship with the lost!
Now show that kolasis (punishment) means correction and not punishment as the vast super majority of Greek liguistic experts translated it as.
my bad spelling
diorthosi,
sophronismos (verbal correction by exhortation)
parthenogenesis
These are the best are unambiguous words for chastening for correction.
and teh grand prize: paideia which is chastening for correction based on love!
Hebrews 12:11 King James Version (KJV)
11 Now no chastening (paideia) for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby.
Whoops, God seems disagrees with you
And if those in the lake of fire are his children, would he not wish to paideia them because He loves them???????????????????????????????????????
But if ou wish to use this argument than you sink your own argument! If they stopped being believers, then God is still chastening them as instruction WHILE ACCORDING TO YOU THEY ARE UNBELIEVERS! Not kolasis, not timera, not diorthosi, nor sophronismos or epanorthis.
Matt. 25 if punishment is not everlasting, then life as well is not everlasting!
XYZ said:They are both exact! so if the aionios kolasis is temporary, then the aionios zoe is temporary as well. You cannot have it mean differing things in the same passage!
XYZ said:It is repeating a line of argument that, so far, you have not even come close to successfully refuting.
XYZ said:It is not an assumption that Matthew 25:46 employs a parallel, but a plain fact.
XYZ said:Let us look at this verse again:
"And these shall go away into eternal (aiōnios) punishment: but the righteous into life eternal (aiōnios)" (Mt.25:26).
Since the structure of this verse is best described as being a "parallelism" then the Greek word aiōnios must carry with it the same meaning in both instances where it is used.