Evidence says otherwise.
Perhaps you should stick to the op and not make the posts about the posters.
Yes, and? He made the universe and it is all ultimately about Him.
You have yet to prove that case; the
evidence posted from scripture proves otherwise and when given the opportunity it is now evidence an affirmation of at least part of what was posted, followed by the choice to deny, attack, ask rhetorical questions already answered and avoid scripture.
All of Creation was made for His purposes, to serve and glorify Him. Do you deny this?
Already answered that question preemptively -
before it was asked. Why as a question already answered? Is it because my post was completely read? Was it the post wasn't fully comprehended? Was it because it was read and understood but there is no regard for the actual content? Was it because there's no genuine interest in resolving the disagreement and this is troll? Whatever it is or isn't
asking questions already answered is a Fail.
All creation is made for His purposes and I quoted scripture's report of what those purposes are. You just ignored that content.
Yes, and? This doesn't negate the fact that all of Creation exists by and for God.
Nice move of the goal posts. The discussion isn't about what creation is or isn't This OP is about the core message of
Christianity. I briefly surveyed scripture to show all scripture is about Christ; the entirety of the law, prophets, psalms, and the NT is about Christ incarnate dead, resurrected, ascended and enthroned so that we could be made like him, raised incorruptible and immortal.
And the response received is rhetorical inquiries already answered and addressed and an absence of scripture.
Yes. This was my point in the post you said was a "fail."
Fail.
1) You point is off-topic. This discussion is about the core message of
Christianity, not creation.
2) You denied "God and us." That is in fact a blunt, undeniable failure to understand
Christianity.
3) The above nonsense ofasking rhetorical questions already answered is not veracious or efficacy.
4) If there is agreement then a two simple words are all that is necessary: "
I agree."
A hearty, "
I completely agree and should not have conflated creation with Christianity, nor stated so bluntly 'Not God and us,'" would be even better.
None of this alters the supremacy and centrality of God in Creation
Red herring. No one here has said otherwise or remotely implied or insinuated otherwise. You're till off-topic and not addressing the actual error committed.
Again, none of this defeats what I pointed out about God ultimately being the point of everything - even and particularly Christianity.
Again: the
evidence proves otherwise.
Glad to read that because the evidence up to this point says otherwise.
And the ultimate purpose of God doing this through Christ was His own glorification. Christians are not the ultimate focus of Christianity; God is. This is Christianity 101...
Another read herring. No one here has said, implied, nor insinuated otherwise. The fact is God is not glorified doing this if this doesn't happen. God is not glorified through Christ's life, death,and resurrection if Christ doesn't live, die and resurrect. God is not glorified by creating us in Christ and raising us incorruptible and immortal if we are not made in Christ and raised thusly. Christianity is in fact about God
and us and you went on record denying that fact. I gave you and every reader here scripture
evidencing my dissent. You? Not so much. Instead I received fallacies of red herring, goal post moving, and the conflation of creation and Christianity.
You screwed up.
All creation is about God and the triune God glorified but that is not the topic of this discussion. All scripture is about Christ; Christ incarnate, crucified, dead, resurrected, ascended and enthroned but that is not the topic of this discussion, either. This OP is about Christianity, a subset condition under both scripture and creation.
Christianity is by definition about little christs, so the "us" cannot be removed from its core message. The post I commended earlier did an excellent job of reporting the core message of
Christianity. The post from which I dissented did not. The response my dissent proved my case.