It is not possible to take all of the creation account in Genesis literally.

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,184
9,196
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,157,077.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
A great many college students loose their faith that their parents may have raised them into, because our colleges teach this idea of a very, very old creation event for which no one really knows the answer as to how it came about. That teaching undermines the very foundation of the opening claim of God in His word. They naturally reason, well if that part isn't true, then how can I have any confidence that any of the rest of it is.
But generally few or none ever come to faith because they take the right college course at the right college. They come to faith because they are pulled or listen and hear the Word of Christ -- Romans 10:17.

Faith isn't faith in one certain creationist theory of how God created held against other creationist theories -- as if faith were choosing the right theory about small details of creation, just mere knowledge and understanding stuff. That's not what faith is. Rather:

Romans 10:17 Consequently, faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of Christ.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: public hermit
Upvote 0

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi halbhh,

Thanks for your response.
But, it's an assumption when you, Ted, presume or assume that this 6th day general creation of humans who are told to multiply is also is the same moment in time as the special creation of Adam individually in the Garden.

Yes, I think that's the same thing you wrote before.

Adam of course clearly was not created along with a group of other humans, and for a while was the only human in the Garden. After Eve was created, then there were 2 humans in the Garden it seems, but not more.

Well, as I produced from God's own record, by the end of the sixth day, God had told someone to go and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it. God's word tells us that He had already created Adam.

I have no problem, and I think have long since admitted, that I also have and make some assumptions. But they are not just blind assumptions with no Scriptural substance to support their understanding. As I said in an earlier post also, I also don't think that you and I are going to resolve this difference.

However, what I do know from God's word is that Adam was 130 years old when Seth was born and 930 years old when he died. You want to start that counting from the fall, ok. Just understand that that understanding is as much based on assumptive data as my understanding that the 130 and 930 years are accounted from the first day that passed, and all those that followed, from the day that God formed Adam from the dust of the ground. Years are nothing more than an accumulation of individual days that are added up based on the solar revolution of the earth around the sun. So, as I understand the Scriptures, the six days consisted of evenings and mornings and all and each day of Adam's life also consisted of a span of a day that contained one evening and one morning. As those days accumulated and the earth made its trip around the sun (created on day 4) then years passed for Adam before and after the fall in pretty much the same way.

There is no Scriptural support to make the claim that years didn't pass before the fall in the same span of time as years after the fall. If they did, then there is no reason to believe that when God tells us the total number of years that Adam lived, that it wouldn't also include those years that passed in the same span before the fall as those years that passed after the fall.

From what I'm reading, that you now are making some claim that Eve may not have even been created roughly the same time as Adam and therefore there wouldn't have been any command to them to go forth and multiply. That you want to discount the time they lived in the garden merely because it allows you to accept the science that says the creation can certainly be billions of years old because we don't know how long a time it was from God's stooping down and creating Adam and the fall. I deny that understanding, but you are freely welcome to it.

God bless,
In Christ, ted
 
Upvote 0

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi again halbhh,

I have also asked how long you might 'guess' that Adam did live between his creation and the fall? I have yet to see you propose an answer to that question, but I think it something that you should seriously consider. If God told Adam and Eve to multiply and fill the earth, do you think it was, what...100 years before Eve conceived her first child? 500 years or a thousand years? I believe that how you understand that passing of time may offer a clue for you to see that your understanding may not be as well thought out as you think it to be.

Or rather, do you have some idea that time didn't exist before the fall, even though the earth was apparently rotating because God accounted each day of the creation as an evening and a morning. If something moves...then time exists! One can always show that first this foot came down and then...wait for it...the other foot comes down. The measure of the span of existence between that first foot coming down and then the second...is time.

God bless,
In Christ, ted
 
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,184
9,196
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,157,077.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
From what I'm reading, that you now are making some claim that Eve may not have even been created roughly the same time as Adam

What??

Ted, I'd better tell you that a few times now I'm reading a post from you to me and suddenly I'm reading that I'm making a claim about something, and then I read what that claim I'm to have been making is...
...and and it isn't at all something that I said or think.

Is there a way we could avoid that?

I didn't say anything that could be reasonably read to say Eve was far apart in time from Adam (which would very obviously contradict the text, which plainly and clearly has Adam created first, and then some time passing (not some large amount though I'd guess!!), and then in time Eve being created).

Can we avoid attributing to me things so different than what I'm trying to say.

What if instead of concluding something (especially something so very wild and wrong), you just take a moment and ask me about it?

Let's look again:

15The Lord God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to work it and take care of it. 16And the Lord God commanded the man, “You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; 17but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat from it you will certainly die.”

18The Lord God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him.”

19Now the Lord God had formed out of the ground all the wild animals and all the birds in the sky. He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name. 20So the man gave names to all the livestock, the birds in the sky and all the wild animals.

But for Adam no suitable helper was found.

...

Clear some time passed here... Not some vast stretch of time we might guess, but more than just a day is a reasonable guess. Eve was created not long after Adam, but not immediately either.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,184
9,196
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,157,077.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi again halbhh,

I have also asked how long you might 'guess' that Adam did live between his creation and the fall? I have yet to see you propose an answer to that question, but I think it something that you should seriously consider. If God told Adam and Eve to multiply and fill the earth, do you think it was, what...100 years before Eve conceived her first child? 500 years or a thousand years? I believe that how you understand that passing of time may offer a clue for you to see that your understanding may not be as well thought out as you think it to be.

Or rather, do you have some idea that time didn't exist before the fall, even though the earth was apparently rotating because God accounted each day of the creation as an evening and a morning. If something moves...then time exists! One can always show that first this foot came down and then...wait for it...the other foot comes down. The measure of the span of existence between that first foot coming down and then the second...is time.

God bless,
In Christ, ted

My guesses I definitely consider only guesses. I'm happy to share them, but don't end up then using them to say I "claim" they are the scripture or definitely what happened.

I consider them educated guesses, only. Speculation.

Ok?

In terms of Adam's own subjective view of time, I'd guess, without a way to know, that to him it would not seem 'long' or 'short' but just would be halcyon.

What we would call 'timeless' -- halcyon days that go by, when years could seem as if only a month, for example. But Adam would not have concepts of time, months, years, I think, there in the Garden.

So, his consciousness at that place would be very different from ours today though I'd expect.

Not very time based at all.

And also, he would not age any.

He was in paradise, with God, and with the Tree of Life.

He would not grow old there.

There is no way to even make a guess at how many days he might have experienced subjectively, and I doubt he would have in any manner kept any count. It could have been just mere thousands. Or millions. Who knows?

But, I don't assume that time itself flowed at the same subjective rate in the Garden as it did in the outside world. For all I know, a day in the Garden could have been a 100 years outside on Earth. There's no way to know.
 
Upvote 0

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi halbhh,

I gleaned what I said from this statement that you made.
presume or assume that this 6th day general creation of humans who are told to multiply is also is the same moment in time as the special creation of Adam individually in the Garden.

You then followed that up with:
Adam of course clearly was not created along with a group of other humans, and for a while was the only human in the Garden. After Eve was created, then there were 2 humans in the Garden it seems, but not more.

You don't define 'for a while', but the gist of your post seems to be saying that this 'day' that is explained as the sixth day in the Scriptures, is somehow not necessarily the day in which both Adam and Eve were created. That Eve may have been created sometime after Adam and that's how you explain that there may have been quite a span of time before Adam and Eve were told to go forth and multiply and whenever Eve subsequently conceived a child.

If not, the my apologies and I'd ask you to rephrase your position because that's what I got out of it.

God bless,
In Christ, ted
 
  • Useful
Reactions: Halbhh
Upvote 0

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi halbhh,

Look, it's ok whatever you want to believe, but here's your opening statement to me regarding this specific issue:
But about the time that passed on the ordinary outside Earth while Adam had Life in the special Garden -- containing the Tree of Life, no less! -- and with the Eternal One for whom even a thousand years is practically nothing, there, walking there with him.... We do not know in scripture any number for that time duration for the outside Earth while Adam had Life in the Garden.

That doesn't seem presented as some 'this is how I see it statement'.

"But, I don't assume that time itself flowed at the same subjective rate in the Garden as it did in the outside world. For all I know, a day in the Garden could have been a 100 years outside on Earth. There's no way to know."

Oyve, now you've really gone to some far off imaginings. So, you don't think that the garden was on the earth and experienced days passing just as the earth did? Despite the fact that the Scriptures mention rivers that still exist on the earth today. Or are you saying that the garden was on the earth, but somehow because of it's special form of creation, it didn't experience time like the rest of the earth? Do you base that understanding on any Scriptural support?


God bless,
In Christ, ted
 
  • Useful
Reactions: Halbhh
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,184
9,196
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,157,077.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi halbhh,

I gleaned what I said from this statement that you made.


You then followed that up with:


You don't define 'for a while', but the gist of your post seems to be saying that this 'day' that is explained as the sixth day in the Scriptures, is somehow not necessarily the day in which both Adam and Eve were created. That Eve may have been created sometime after Adam and that's how you explain that there may have been quite a span of time before Adam and Eve were told to go forth and multiply and whenever Eve subsequently conceived a child.

If not, the my apologies and I'd ask you to rephrase your position because that's what I got out of it.

God bless,
In Christ, ted
Ok, it's getting late, but just the quick descripture, in my guessing, I think the Garden of Eden was a special place not like the rest of Earth, not even partly, but more like heaven on Earth, and unlike normal Earth as we know it now even in the best places here, the most beautiful here. It was unlike here. It was....something else. Not under the same rules.

Now, it's guessing, but I think the humans created on the 6th day were separate entirely from the Garden of Eden. And later those other humans would provide a wife for Cain when he left in Genesis chapter 4 and went to the land of Nod and took a wife there.

It's not at all important what I guess.

We do know it's a fact there have been other kinds of humans that seem to largely predate our own kind, on Earth, because we have found their bones. To me, this is just zero trouble to reconcile with the scripture. It fits instantly, see.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,184
9,196
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,157,077.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi halbhh,

Look, it's ok whatever you want to believe, but here's your opening statement to me regarding this specific issue:


That doesn't seem presented as some 'this is how I see it statement'.

"But, I don't assume that time itself flowed at the same subjective rate in the Garden as it did in the outside world. For all I know, a day in the Garden could have been a 100 years outside on Earth. There's no way to know."

Oyve, now you've really gone to some far off imaginings. So, you don't think that the garden was on the earth and experienced days passing just as the earth did? Despite the fact that the Scriptures mention rivers that still exist on the earth today. Or are you saying that the garden was on the earth, but somehow because of it's special form of creation, it didn't experience time like the rest of the earth? Do you base that understanding on any Scriptural support?


God bless,
In Christ, ted
" So, you don't think that the garden was on the earth "

!??!

Oh no. You've done it again. lol

lol

It's late, and we should call it a night.

And no, I don't have any views or guesses that contradict scripture so obviously as that (anyone can have gaps in knowledge, but c'mon!)

lol

We all know, right? that the Garden was on Earth, and even know the rough location.

God can.

God can do anything.

Anything.

Get it?

Ok. God bless you, and good night.
Love, Hal
 
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,479
7,861
...
✟1,192,316.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
It is important to get the beginning correct because if we don't we are making Jesus out to be untruthful in what He said in Matthew 19:3-6 (Note: I am not saying that you believe Christ's words are not true, but I am saying that your interpretation on Matthew 19:3-6 is not true based on a plain and normal reading). Jesus said in the beginning God made them male and female, and then he referenced how man shall not separate what God has joined together.

3 "The Pharisees also came unto him, tempting him, and saying unto him, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause?
4 And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female,
5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?
6 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder."
(Matthew 19:3-6).​

This is a direct reference from two different references in Genesis:

Genesis 1 (confirms the words of Jesus in Matthew 19:4) says,

"So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them." (Genesis 1:27).

Genesis 2 (confirms the word of Jesus in Matthew 19:5-6) says,

"Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh." (Genesis 2:24).​

Notice that Jesus references Genesis 1:27, and Genesis 2:24 as one event and not two.

Note: Adam and Eve (in Genesis 3) are the same male and female mentioned in Genesis 2 because God warns Adam about not eating of the wrong tree.

Genesis 2 is just a more detailed narrative of events on Day 6 (from Genesis 1).
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Tolworth John

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Mar 10, 2017
8,278
4,684
68
Tolworth
✟369,679.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
A literal day is one rotation of the earth about its axis. You can't have a literal day without a planet.

Why are you demanding a literal day?
astronaunts in space and submariners don't have literal days, they both use 'clocks' to measure the passing of time.
Why do you assume that God cannot measure the passing of time?
 
Upvote 0

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Ok, it's getting late, but just the quick descripture, in my guessing, I think the Garden of Eden was a special place not like the rest of Earth, not even partly, but more like heaven on Earth, and unlike normal Earth as we know it now even in the best places here, the most beautiful here. It was unlike here. It was....something else. Not under the same rules.

Now, it's guessing, but I think the humans created on the 6th day were separate entirely from the Garden of Eden. And later those other humans would provide a wife for Cain when he left in Genesis chapter 4 and went to the land of Nod and took a wife there.

It's not at all important what I guess.

We do know it's a fact there have been other kinds of humans that seem to largely predate our own kind, on Earth, because we have found their bones. To me, this is just zero trouble to reconcile with the scripture. It fits instantly, see.

Morning halbhh,

Ok, I understand your thinking, and I'm glad that we're now clear in explaining that, for each one of us, when it comes to those things that the Scriptures are not specifically clear about, "this is how I understand it".

You mentioned in an earlier post the passage of Scripture: But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day. I believe that to be literally true, but I also believe it to only apply to the Lord, as it says. The Lord knows the end from the beginning and is the Alpha and Omega. Man, however, in his fleshly tent would always be subject to time. In the Revelation we are given a picture of a crowd of saints who cry out to the Lord, “How long, Sovereign Lord, holy and true, until you judge the inhabitants of the earth and avenge our blood?” They apparently, even in heaven, don't have that same attribute of God to see the end from the beginning. They seem to still be waiting out days as time continues in this realm.

So, I'm not really sure, and would again just encourage prayer and study, to confirm that there was some period of Adam's natural life after God formed him from the dust of the ground that his living wasn't always within the confines of time, as expressed by the movement of the celestial bodies God created in this realm so that man could have seasons and times. For the Scriptures do say: He made the moon to mark the seasons, and the sun knows when to go down. Both of which are constructs of time.

To repeat how I understand the line of time from God's forming Adam and Eve from the dust of the ground until the fall: God created Adam and Eve on day six. He made them both male and female. God also gave them the command to multiply and fill the earth and subdue and rule over all that He had made upon the earth, also on day six. He set them in a special place upon the earth that He had created especially for them that He calls the garden. God walked with them and enjoyed a relationship with them just as He created them to have. However, it does seem that even before Eve was able to conceive the first child for which Adam named her to be the mother of all the living, Satan showed up and tempted her into rebellion against God and she did the same for her husband.

I'm honestly not convinced that there was any particularly long span of days in which Adam and Eve lived upon the earth outside the fetters of time. So, I'm of the mind that when God's word tells us that Adam lived 930 years, it is referring to all the days of Adam's life from the day in which he was created.

As I think BH is making the point, this understanding of the 'time' surrounding the creation event, I believe, is very important. Why? First of all because I don't think that God wastes a lot of what He has chosen to be recorded in His word to us with a lot of unimportant 'fluff'. I believe there's a reason that God gave us the accounting of the genealogies with the years included as they are. If God merely wanted us to take away from the generations the line from Adam to Jesus, as is His purpose in the account of Matthew and Luke, He didn't need to include the age data. He could have merely had written that Adam begat Seth and Seth begat Enosh, etc. I think that God intended to write those years, even beginning the account of the generations from Adam with this introduction: This is the written account of Adam’s family line. When God created mankind, he made them in the likeness of God. He created them male and female and blessed them. And he named them “Mankind” when they were created. God opens this part of His word explaining that what is about to follow flows from the very day that He first created mankind and gave them His blessing.

God wanted the thinking man to understand that we are living in a created realm of His design and purpose and nothing happened by the chance of evolution or eons of time to assimilate and coalesce into the universe as we see it today. Just as He caused to be written that each day of the creation event consisted of an evening and a morning just as we experience days today, God wants us to also understand that there is no billions or trillions of years of history for this realm in which we live. It was all created with purpose and for every generation since Moses wrote the account of the beginning, we can understand the 'when' that Adam and Eve lived with a fair degree of accuracy. Because we can merely add up the number of years of the genealogies. When we lose that understanding, as I believe BH is pointing out, then we also begin to lose the true understanding of God.

It is this understanding of eons of time for the creation event, that allows man to begin to say, "Well, there really isn't a God, it all just coalesced over time by the natural processes of matter hanging about in the universe". If we could possibly get every human being to believe the creation event as it is described in the Scriptures, I don't think any of us would have any doubt that there is a God and He has created us with a purpose in mind and there will be a day of reckoning for all that He has created. Understanding and believing the creation event as it is described in the Scriptures is our most powerful testimony of the awesome power and purpose of God. Just as the Scriptures also claim: The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands. But that's only so if we believe that all those stars and all that we find in the sky were merely made by the command of God. If it was all created over eons of time by just the melding and molding of some sort of natural matter in space, then no, the heavens don't really declare the power and glory of God, but are understood as just the work of fairly natural processes. Which is exactly what scientific theory is trying to teach us.

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but you also seem to be making some point that there were more humans created by God, from the dust of the ground, than Adam and Eve. How then do you explain that Adam named Eve, Eve, because she would be the mother of all the living. If Adam knew that God had created others, he surely would have also known that Eve was not going to be the mother of all the living.

I just encourage you to study up on some of this. I believe that all born again believers, those who have the Spirit of God of which Jesus said would lead us into all truth, should fully understand this issue of the beginning. That we live in a a created realm. Created miraculously, which cannot be explained by any scientific work of man. That such creation event did take place when God's word leads us to believe that it did take place. That one day that same God who created all things miraculously by merely the command of His voice, will also draw it all to a close and then will come judgment and eternal life or eternal condemnation.

Now, certainly this isn't something that I would be so adamant with a new believer or someone just asking questions concerning what it means to have faith in God. However, I am assuming that you and I don't fit into either of those categories, and we, like the disciples, can sit at the Savior's feet and talk about the more weighty matters of the Scriptures and the God that they portray to us.

God bless,
In Christ, ted
 
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,184
9,196
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,157,077.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You mentioned in an earlier post the passage of Scripture: But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day. I believe that to be literally true, but I also believe it to only apply to the Lord, as it says.

Hi Ted, good morning.

You wrote "as it says" in the quote above, after writing "I believe that to be literally true, but I also believe it to only apply to the Lord"

Let's look again at that wonderful scripture!

8 But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day. 9 The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. Instead he is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance.

10 But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and everything done in it will be laid bare.


-------
As we can see, there is no wording that says that only the Lord alone can experience that timelessness in heaven. It seems much more fitting scripture as a whole (all of the Bible) to think God can indeed give that wonderful gift of timelessness to all in Heaven, if He chooses, and it seems likely it would be a part of eternal Life. We cannot just use an assumption as if a certainty that He reserves this quality of eternal life for Himself alone. But certainly in any case, we could not assert it is the scripture that He only allows Himself alone to experience that timelessness in Heaven, and none others there.

Because God Himself walked in the Garden, and because He put the Tree of Life in the Garden, and because He warned about a way towards death:

16 And the Lord God commanded the man, “You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; 17 but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat from it you will certainly die.”

We therefore cannot conclude as if a certainty that the Garden of Eden had ordinary time just like the mortal world of death we live in now.

To posit or insist that the Garden had only ordinary time, and so wasn't much different from the rest of the Earth really (except only for the 2 special trees and that there were exactly 2 humans) -- just a regular Earth area not special, but with a kind of fence or boundary only.... -- that would be only a theory, an idea, just a theory, but not such a good one I think.

Here's why I think it's not a good theory. It seems to not agree with the overall tone and sense of all the chapters in Genesis, where God does the miraculous over and over. That theory would seem to suggest that for the Garden, God only added a fence and a couple of special trees? I think that theory like that, we ought to toss away. But why want any theory even like it? I hope not merely to defend some numerical age of the Earth, just to merely defend a doctrine based on some assumptions not in scripture.
 
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,184
9,196
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,157,077.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I just encourage you to study up on some of this. I believe that all born again believers, those who have the Spirit of God of which Jesus said would lead us into all truth, should fully understand this issue of the beginning. That we live in a a created realm. Created miraculously, which cannot be explained by any scientific work of man. That such creation event did take place when God's word leads us to believe that it did take place. That one day that same God who created all things miraculously by merely the command of His voice, will also draw it all to a close and then will come judgment and eternal life or eternal condemnation.
You will not have omniscience on this Earth in this mortal life, but you do have revealed to you mysteries that were hidden since the beginning, even from the prophets, as Christ said. That's many deep things, now revealed to us! But not all the way to total omniscience. Just one example: none of us will know the exact day or hour of the 2nd coming. Christ said so, and that makes it fact.

So, that's something you cannot know, as a certainty. Therefore, the "all things" are all things that matter for the salvation of your soul, but not all things in all the Universe.

It matters not even a bit whether a person has some special knowledge of some small details of creation, for their salvation.

Not at all.

Salvation is based on faith in Christ, alone. And faith comes through hearing, and hearing comes through the Word of Christ.

I don't believe your theories of creation, but instead I believe what I read in the Bible, see.

You should be glad for that.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi halbhh,

Thanks for your response.
You wrote "as it says" in the quote above, after writing "I believe that to be literally true, but I also believe it to only apply to the Lord"

Yes, that's what I wrote and after reading your explanation my understanding isn't changed. You also should consider, certainly as regards this specific issue of some period of 'timelessness' in the garden, what I also copied from God's word concerning His own explanation before having the genealogical timeline written out for us that He Himself said that He was giving us a timeline of Adam's generations from the day that mankind was created.

So, I'm willing to consider that maybe there would be a time that God would draw us into the 'timelessness' that He experiences, but He didn't do so with His time with Adam and Eve in the Garden according to His very own explanation of the starting point of the genealogies. God seems to have again, answered the question for us as to what time period that He was accounting for us as the starting point of Adam's years of life. Just as God, for those with ears to hear and eyes to see, has also answered for us the question of how long the days, in the six day account of creation, were.

They were six days pretty much like every day we still experience. With each one consisting of half a solar day of one evening and one morning. They were not some eons of age with many actual rotations of the earth on its axis with God somehow marking out a hundred or a thousand or a million such days, to be defined as 'one' day.

I believe that God knows the end from the beginning. I, therefore, believe that God knew before the foundations of the world were set in place, that a time would come upon the earth that men would be having this discussion concerning the length of time that the 'six days' marked out. God, knowing that this discussion was going to come about and knowing that fairly good arguments might be made to deny the reality of the days being six literal days, included in his account, just for the purpose that His children could have confidence in what they believed about the creation, 'and there was evening and there was morning' for each day of creation. God is wiser than you or I could ever hope to imagine to be and He knows the limitations of our understanding and the bent of our hearts to deny His truth. So God put in His word for His children a contextual clue whereby we could be assured that each day was just a pretty regular day as to its length.

I believe that similarly, God also included the ages of the generations from Adam for that same purpose. God knew that a time would come when manmade science would do it's very best to try and teach us to deny the truth of God concerning the age of the creation. God knew that day would come. So God, in His perfect wisdom, also included contextual notations whereby His children could be assured that they knew the truth when it came to 'how long this has all been going on'.

Otherwise, there is no reason for God to have defined each day as consisting of an evening and a morning. He could have just said that He did this and that and thus ended day one of His creating. He cold have just had written that Adam begat Seth and so-and-so begat so-and-so throughout the first generations without telling us how many years of life they had lived. And specifically how many years of life each father had lived before that father had a child! For it is really only the age of the father when he had each child by which we can count back the years of the creation event. If the Scriptures were to only tell us that Adam had a son named Seth at some point in his life and then lived 930 years, well Adam could have been 10 or 500 or 900 years old when he had his son. Then Seth's years of life allow us the freedom of guessing at another several hundred years in which he may have begat Enosh. No. God, according to my understanding gave us the age of each father when he had a specific child and then that child's ages when he had his child, and so on, because it is only by figuring the age of the father when he had each respective child whereby we can confirm God's timeline of the existence of His created realm of existence in which we live.

So, just so you understand, I have studied the Scriptures at length and as I've studied, I have found these contextual clues that God has sprinkled throughout His testimony to us of all that He has done, pieces that answer a lot of our questions and doubts as to whether or not we can really believe them as they are written. God is wiser than you or I could ever hope to be and yes, He does know the end from the beginning, and I believe that for His children, He has given those with eyes to see and ears to hear, the answers to many of the questions that He knew were going to come up among mankind to deny the truth of His word.

God is just awesomely powerful, but also just awesomely wise!!! Praise our God!

God bless,
In Christ, ted
 
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,479
7,861
...
✟1,192,316.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I've never met an adult IRL who did take the creation account in Genesis literally instead of allegorically. It's only been on here that I've "met" ppl who do but I mean they also believe the Earth is flat so.......shrugs.

IRL? What’s that?
 
Upvote 0

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi again halbhh,

Thanks for your response:
So, that's something you cannot know, as a certainty. Therefore, the "all things" are all things that matter for the salvation of your soul, but not all things in all the Universe.

Absolutely agreed that Jesus was only referring to spiritual things and the things of God's testimony to us. Yes, Jesus said that we would not know the day of his return. For God's children, the Spirit confirms that for us. So, when we read or hear some prophet proclaiming that Jesus is coming back on June 14, 2008, we know that's a false prophet according to the confirmation of the Spirit of God that no one will know the time of Jesus return. God's Spirit leads us to understand that truth that Jesus spoke.

However, that's a future event for which God told us we would not have any understanding and we don't. The things we are discussing are things of the past that God has given us written understanding of how and when they came about. There is a difference in that and yes, the Spirit of God confirms them both.

It matters not even a bit whether a person has some special knowledge of some small details of creation, for their salvation.

So says you. Let's hope that your prophetic proclamation is the truth. What God's word says is that no unbeliever will gain eternal life. It doesn't say 'no unbeliever in the truth of Jesus' purpose'. It merely says that no unbeliever will gain eternal life. My contention is that because Jesus said that for those who are born again that they would receive the Spirit who would guide them into all truth (yes the truth of God and not the truth of civil engineering) we should expect to understand these things and when contentions or questions come up we should be able to call on the Spirit in our prayers to give us whatever point of truth we need concerning the things of God.

Again, as regards this particular issue, I believe that just the very words of God's testimony have given us he contextual clues whereby we can know that we know.

Do you believe that God said He was accounting Adam's age from the day that He was created when He says that these are the days of the generations of mankind from the day that mankind was created? Do you believe that? That is a part of God's revelation of all that He has done. You are on record that you are a literalist.

God bless,
In Christ, ted
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums