Adam called woman woman because she was taken from man. How would old age evos who claim some belief of the bible explain this?
You may want to watch this video from 31:30, if you are interested in how to interpret it without a modern YEC literalism.Adam called woman woman because she was taken from man. How would old age evos who claim some belief of the bible explain this?
They have to make Genesis a parable. They also need to do away with the fall.Adam called woman woman because she was taken from man. How would old age evos who claim some belief of the bible explain this?
I'm confused, are you in support of evolution or not?
Then I can answer you.
No. I believe in creation and all adapting or evolving was after that.I'm confused, are you in support of evolution or not?
Then I can answer you.
While still calling themselves 'christians'?They have to make Genesis a parable. They also need to do away with the fall.
At 42:21 minutes in your movie, I see thisYou may want to watch this video from 31:30, if you are interested in how to interpret it without a modern YEC literalism.
After man and woman were created that would be the case. Not sure where evolution is a dish served at the table here.Because of the separation in the beginning a man MUST now leave mother and father and cleave to the wife.... and then they become One Flesh again......after that....i guess evolution should be back on the table....
Because of the separation in the beginning a man MUST now leave mother and father and cleave to the wife.... and then they become One Flesh again......after that....i guess evolution should be back on the table....
?At 42:21 minutes in your movie, I see this
"...no biblical account of human origins "
They suggest if Genesis is 'archetypal' this would be a conclusion.
Reminds me of a verse..
2Ti 3:13 -But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived.
Look at the top quote on the poster at the point I mentioned.
I think they can still call themselves "christians" as many christians no nothing about YEC, ID, Noahs flood models etc.While still calling themselves 'christians'?
At 42:21 minutes in your movie, I see this
"...no biblical account of human origins "
They suggest if Genesis is 'archetypal' this would be a conclusion.
Reminds me of a verse..
2Ti 3:13 -But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived.
1 Cor 11:8 For man was not made from woman, but woman from man.Look at the top quote on the poster at the point I mentioned.
It seems to me there IS an account of where Eve came from and Adam.
Not biological, but theological.Look at the top quote on the poster at the point I mentioned.
It seems to me there IS an account of where Eve came from and Adam.
After man and woman were created that would be the case. Not sure where evolution is a dish served at the table here.
OkI think they can still call themselves "christians" as many christians no nothing about YEC, ID, Noahs flood models etc.
Most have been forced fed evolutionism all of their life.
The Theo-Evos do need a reason for the fall and the spread of sin and death through one man and not an evolving population.