Genetics, paleontology, ecology all directly support evolution. Say you don't believe in evolution for whatever personal reason you like, but the claim that science is on your side is simply false.
Let's see...
Genetics ....doesn't do much more than validate the idea that all of life descends from a common source. However by copying and re-using basic templates on the computer, I've designed nested hierarchies of virtual creations without even realizing it. "Descent with modification" flows quite naturally from a design perspective. Yet evolutionsts want you to believe that such patterns explicitly cry out for an evolutionary cause.
It's funny, because when you pop this bubble, they will retreat to their philosophical safe place: "science can only concern itself with natural causes"...
Paleontology..... doesn't directly support Evolution at all. It's simply a record of buried ecosystems. Usually ecosystems that very suddenly appear in the rock record with no apparent precursors.... Evolutionists employ some pretty weird logic to try and convince you that paleontology proves Evolution..... (e.g. "if evolution were false, we'd find fossils of bunny rabbits swimming on the ocean floor with the trilobytes!") ... and so on.
Ecology... well, to be honest, the field has never been very kind to evolutionsts. Everything is breaking down and degrading, or cycling through different phenotypical expressions. (e.g. finch beak structure) that the animal already possessed and were triggered by the environment. This last one is usually obvious because it happens way too fast to have a Darwinian explanation.
Upvote
0