I read the chapter, and unless I am missing something you are once again dead wrong. Having a man in anger ask for some silly revenge act to happen is NOT God asking! t only that, but it seems the lady was sent TWO children rather than just the one by God! Hahahahahahahahahaha
It seems to me that you are missing something, yes. It wasn't Judah himself who wrote that story, and whoever did write it (Moses, wasn't it?) was completely unconcerned about a pregnant woman being burned to death. The story shows absolutely no condemnation of Judah at all; nobody cared about executing a pregnant woman. There were no biblical rules against it; God didn't care.
So, hahahahahahaha yourself. Not only does the Bible have nothing against abortion in it, it doesn't even notice the unborn, doesn't care about them at all.
It is almost like you refuse to admit God sends children and punishes those who kill and sacrifice them.
A huge amount of assumptions there that you're going to have to back up instead of airily breezing over. God sends children? By stork, wasn't it? And God punishes women who have abortions? Not that I've noticed. It's almost like you're just making up everything you say.
Still pretending murdering little ones is cool?
Abortion isn't murder, fetuses aren't children, and the Bible doesn't say abortion is wrong.
Explain to us how Jesus did not love the little children? Explain where He ran around ripping babies from the womb? Explain how Jesus wanted us to be mass murderers especially of innocent little babies? Explain to us how Jesus advocated sacrificing babies?
Explain to us where Jesus had anything at all to say about abortions, something that was well known Biblical times.
I've already posted arguments as to why abortion is not immoral. You had nothing to answer them.
Cheer up, the Judge is coming soon.
Christians have been saying that ever since Jesus left. His actual disciples expected him to come back in their lifetimes.
Tell me, when do you think Jesus will come back? In your life time? In this decade? Before the year 2200?
Says you.