. The evidence doesn’t exist.
Numerous transitional series in the fossil record.
Darwin’s third expectation - of higher-taxon stratomorphic intermediates - has been confirmed by such examples as the mammal-like reptile groups31 between the reptiles and the mammals, and the phenacdontids32 between the horses and their presumed ancestors. Darwin’s fourth expectation - of stratomorphic series - has been confirmed by such examples as the early bird series,33 the tetrapod series,34,35 the whale series,36 the various mammal series of the Cenozoic37 (for example, the horse series, the camel series, the elephant series, the pig series, the titanothere series, etc.), the Cantius and Plesiadapus primate series,38 and the hominid series.39 Evidence for not just one but for all three of the species level and above types of stratomorphic intermediates expected by macroevolutionary theory is surely strong evidence for macroevolutionary theory. Creationists therefore need to accept this fact. It certainly CANNOT said that traditional creation theory expected (predicted) any of these fossil finds.
YE creationist Kurt Wise,
Toward a Creationist Understanding of Transitional Forms
More examples on request.
2. The historical timelines that purportedly support it are constantly mutating.
Detailed studies between 1820 and 1850 of the strata and fossils of Europe produced the sequence of geologic periods still used today.
Geologic time scale - Wikipedia
That seems pretty stable to me.
3. The theory is a complete failure as a predictive model.
Do we have verified predictions of evolutionary theory?
1. populations tend to become more fit for their environments over time. Verified
2. at one time, there must have been dinosaurs with feathers. Verified
3. Humans first appeared in Africa. Verified.
4. well-adapted populations in a stable environment will evolve slowly, if at all. Verified
5. DNA analyses should show the same family tree of organisms that Linneaus found. Verified
6. There must have been at one time, fish with legs. Verified.
How many more would you like to see?
4. The theory is scientifically and technologically irrelevant. There are no evolutionary engineers.
Antibiotic protocols work according to evolutionary principals. For that matter, Flemming correctly predicted that excessive use of antibiotics would lead to the evolution of resistance by bacteria.
It is also possible to use repeated rounds of mutation and selection to evolve proteins with particular properties, such as modified enzymes or new antibodies, in a process called directed evolution.
Applications of evolution - Wikipedia
Engineers have learned to copy evolution, in order solve problems that are too difficult to solve by design. Optimization of diesel engines, for example:
Genetic Algorithms Optimization of Diesel Engine Emissions and Fuel Efficiency with Air Swirl, EGR,Injection Timing and Multiple Injections
5. Theoretical epicycles are increasingly required to maintain its viability.
In fact, Darwin's five points remain as solid as ever. While evolutionary theory has become more and more robust as we learn more about the phenomenon, the fact that the basic outline of evolution remains verified is pretty impressive.
6. The theory is a repeated failure as an explanatory model.
Since it can adequately explain things like why shark tail fins are vertical while whale flukes are horizontal, and why mammals have a simple lower jaws and complex ears while reptiles have complex lower jaws and simple ears, you've been badly misled about that.
7. There is a very long track record of scientific fraud surrounding it.
I know of one major fraud, Piltdown. We don't know who faked the find, but we do know that evolutionary scientists debunked it. And there have been a good number of mistakes with no fraud. On the other hand, there really are many, many creationist frauds. Would you like me to show you some of them?