• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

What is the Church's position on Creation/Evolution

ArmyMatt

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jan 26, 2007
42,383
21,059
Earth
✟1,677,238.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
"We will not remove the age-old landmarks which our Fathers have set, but we keep the tradition we have received. For if we begin to erode the foundations of the Church even a little, in no time at all the whole edifice will fall to the ground." -St John of Damascus, On the Divine Images

"Sacred Tradition, as the eternal and immutable dwelling of the Holy Spirit in the Church, lies at the very root of her being, and so encompasses her entire life." -Elder Sophrony, St Silouan of Mt Athos
 
Upvote 0

gzt

The age of the Earth is 4.54 ± 0.07 billion years
Jul 14, 2004
10,663
1,953
Abolish ICE
Visit site
✟161,830.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
"Consensus of the saints" brings about an odd kind of historiographic question - it's not as easy as that, and the easy equation of that with the mind of the Church brushes a lot of things under the rug. I'm reminded of something Fr Florovsky once said, but not having the book on hand, I'll go with something else that is at least searchable:
Just yesterday the question was put to me, in my Patristic seminar, by one of the participants: we enjoy immensely, he said, the reading of the Fathers, but what is their “authority”? Are we supposed to accept from them even that in which they obviously were “situation-conditioned” and probably inaccurate, inadequate, and even wrong? My answer was obviously, No. Not only because, as it is persistently urged, only the consensus patrum [consensus of the Fathers] is binding—and, as to myself, I do not like this phrase. The “authority” of the Fathers is not a dictatus papae [dictate of the pope]. They are guides and witnesses, no more. Their vision is “of authority”, not necessarily their words. By studying the Fathers we are compelled to face the problems, and then we can follow them but creatively, not in the mood of repetition. I mentioned this already in the brief preface to my Eastern Fathers of the IV Century, and provoked a fiery indignation of the late Dom Clement Lialine. So many in our time are still looking for authoritative answers, even before they have encountered any problem. I am fortunate to have in my seminars students who are studying Fathers because they are interested in creative theology, and not just in history or archaeology.
But to go back directly to what the previous person said: do we really think that modern (I do emphasize modern here) YEC after the mold of Father Seraphim Rose believe precisely what Moses did about Genesis 1? (And also that it's useless to consider the work of scholars like Walton on the "lost world of Genesis 1")
 
  • Agree
Reactions: fat wee robin
Upvote 0

gzt

The age of the Earth is 4.54 ± 0.07 billion years
Jul 14, 2004
10,663
1,953
Abolish ICE
Visit site
✟161,830.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
"Sacred Tradition, as the eternal and immutable dwelling of the Holy Spirit in the Church, lies at the very root of her being, and so encompasses her entire life." -Elder Sophrony, St Silouan of Mt Athos
Ah, but it's quite something to equate that to what is being asserted.
 
Upvote 0

ArmyMatt

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jan 26, 2007
42,383
21,059
Earth
✟1,677,238.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
"Consensus of the saints" brings about an odd kind of historiographic question - it's not as easy as that, and the easy equation of that with the mind of the Church brushes a lot of things under the rug. I'm reminded of something Fr Florovsky once said, but not having the book on hand, I'll go with something else that is at least searchable:

But to go back directly to what the previous person said: do we really think that modern (I do emphasize modern here) YEC after the mold of Father Seraphim Rose believe precisely what Moses did about Genesis 1? (And also that it's useless to consider the work of scholars like Walton on the "lost world of Genesis 1")

Elder Joseph of Vatopedi had a vision and said creation happened exactly as Moses accounted.

and Fr Seraphim's view was the mold of St John Maximovitch.
 
Upvote 0

ArmyMatt

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jan 26, 2007
42,383
21,059
Earth
✟1,677,238.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
the whole argument? what citations are you lacking? jckstraw would cite the ancient Fathers, I have cited more modern ones, then there are academics who are also Young Earthers, what exact citations are you missing?
 
Upvote 0

ArmyMatt

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jan 26, 2007
42,383
21,059
Earth
✟1,677,238.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
and the Fr Georges Florovsky quote doesn't support your position in this issue. you are saying their consensus is not binding and they are not guides when it comes to this, even the Fathers of our time. your position is actually the opposite of the quote you made.
 
Upvote 0

gzt

The age of the Earth is 4.54 ± 0.07 billion years
Jul 14, 2004
10,663
1,953
Abolish ICE
Visit site
✟161,830.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Let's back up to what the poster argued that I said "citation needed" to:

>And the Church's understanding of Genesis has not changed since day 1, glory to God!

>It's a pretty basic statement. Tradition is unchanging.

The "two bald assertions" - there's quite a bit to unpack and cite, by the way, in the link between the two statements. It's hardly trivial.
 
Upvote 0

gzt

The age of the Earth is 4.54 ± 0.07 billion years
Jul 14, 2004
10,663
1,953
Abolish ICE
Visit site
✟161,830.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
and the Fr Georges Florovsky quote doesn't support your position in this issue. you are saying their consensus is not binding and they are not guides when it comes to this, even the Fathers of our time. your position is actually the opposite of the quote you made.
That's your position on it, but not mine.
 
Upvote 0

ArmyMatt

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jan 26, 2007
42,383
21,059
Earth
✟1,677,238.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
That's your position on it, but not mine.

Fr Georges says the consensus is binding, you have argued it isn't. modern Fathers refute evolution, which proves Fr Georges' point that the rejection of evolution isn't just history and archaeology. what in what he says actually supports your view?
 
Upvote 0

ArmyMatt

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jan 26, 2007
42,383
21,059
Earth
✟1,677,238.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Let's back up to what the poster argued that I said "citation needed" to:

>And the Church's understanding of Genesis has not changed since day 1, glory to God!

>It's a pretty basic statement. Tradition is unchanging.

The "two bald assertions" - there's quite a bit to unpack and cite, by the way, in the link between the two statements. It's hardly trivial.

I quoted two who say tradition is unchanging and provided the works that say it. as for Genesis, every time we have these discussions, jckstraw would give you the references.
 
Upvote 0

gzt

The age of the Earth is 4.54 ± 0.07 billion years
Jul 14, 2004
10,663
1,953
Abolish ICE
Visit site
✟161,830.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Fr Georges says the consensus is binding, you have argued it isn't. modern Fathers refute evolution, which proves Fr Georges' point that the rejection of evolution isn't just history and archaeology. what in what he says actually supports your view?
I haven't argued the first.
 
Upvote 0

ArmyMatt

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jan 26, 2007
42,383
21,059
Earth
✟1,677,238.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
I haven't argued the first.

you have argued at every turn as to why we should not listen to the Fathers when it comes to evolution. just earlier in this thread, you gave reason as to why St Theophan the recluse's objections were forgivable, because he lived not long after Darwin.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

ArmyMatt

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jan 26, 2007
42,383
21,059
Earth
✟1,677,238.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
We shouldn't listen to a handful of modern saints on a couple specific questions.

you mean like how it was only a handful of then modern saints who opposed Arius in the 4th century?

by the way, you just said opposite of what Fr Florovsky said. he said consensus of the saints is binding, but not for evolution according to you for some reason.
 
Upvote 0