Why evolution isn't scientific

[Aman777]

I said you can push it by as much as you want PROVIDED YOU HAVE THE EVIDENCE TO BACK IT UP.

Would you consider the above goading? or screaming? or not being all namby pamby, like Christians ought to be? Some of the new gung ho mods will let it go because it comes from an unbeliever, while deleting posts which uphold God's Truth. Amen?

 

[xianghua]

It is neither a test nor a prediction.

so evolution doesnt predict what we will find/not find?

 

[xianghua]

Because I very clearly stated that YOU NEED EVIDENCE. You have provided NOTHING.

here is again an "out of place fossil", so this is clearly not true.:

in this case they push tetrapod evolution by about 20 my. and if it possible with fishes its also possible with a bear.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

so evolution doesnt predict what if we will find/not find?

That's not what's being said at all.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

so evolution doesnt predict what we will find/not find?

Sure it does. But that's not what your assertion is doing.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

here is again an "out of place fossil", so this is clearly not true.:

in this case they push tetrapod evolution by about 20 my. and if it possible with fishes its also possible with a bear.

Please explain how a tetrapod fossil within expected limits is evidence of an out of place bear.

 

[Kylie]

Would you consider the above goading? or screaming? or not being all namby pamby, like Christians ought to be? Some of the new gung ho mods will let it go because it comes from an unbeliever, while deleting posts which uphold God's Truth. Amen?

I'm trying to make a point. I've repeated it many times already, and since Xianghua still doesn't seem to have noticed it, I can only conclude that I have to make it more noticeable.

Or are you suggesting that Xianghua is intentionally ignoring parts of my replies?

 

[Kylie]

here is again an "out of place fossil", so this is clearly not true.:

in this case they push tetrapod evolution by about 20 my. and if it possible with fishes its also possible with a bear.

If I recall correctly, it has already been explained to you why this isn't out of place.

 

[xianghua]

Please explain how a tetrapod fossil within expected limits is evidence of an out of place bear.

the tetrapod fossil appear before the missing links between tetrapods and fishes. so its out of place.

 

[xianghua]

If I recall correctly, it has already been explained to you why this isn't out of place.

since you are the one who said that there is no evidence for an out of place fossil i want to hear your explanation. again: if we can push creatures evolution why we cant push bear evolution too?

 

[Aman777]

I'm trying to make a point. I've repeated it many times already, and since Xianghua still doesn't seem to have noticed it, I can only conclude that I have to make it more noticeable.

Sorry, but I just had thread yanked for goading and your's is ten times as bad as mine was. I think it could be a devilish censor who sneaked in among the mods. After all, he could lie and tell the head mod that he was a believer and the mod would be forced to believe him, no matter how terrible he is. It's the board rules, you know?

Or are you suggesting that Xianghua is intentionally ignoring parts of my replies?

Probably. Your screaming certainly hasn't stopped him from posting. Amen?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

the tetrapod fossil appear before the missing links between tetrapods and fishes. so its out of place.

That's... that's not what happened at all. Why are you lying?

 

[Bungle_Bear]

the tetrapod fossil appear before the missing links between tetrapods and fishes. so its out of place.

Even if that were true (which it isn't), how would that be evidence of your bear?

 

[Kylie]

since you are the one who said that there is no evidence for an out of place fossil i want to hear your explanation. again: if we can push creatures evolution why we cant push bear evolution too?

Because you have no evidence for it!

Show me a 200 million year old bear fossil and I will agree that bears are 200 million years old, AND I will agree that this 200 million year old bear is a seriously problem for evolution.

But you have never been able to do this! You NEVER provide evidence to back up your fantasies and wishful thinking. Your position has NOTHING.

 

[the iconoclast]

But you have never been able to do this! You NEVER provide evidence to back up your fantasies and wishful thinking. Your position has NOTHING.

Hey hey kylie

You seem like an angry person. R u ok?

 

[Kylie]

Hey hey kylie

You seem like an angry person. R u ok?

I tend to get annoyed by people who think their fantasies trump reality.

Also people who don't have a basic grasp of logic.

 

[the iconoclast]

I tend to get annoyed by people who think their fantasies trump reality.


Also people who don't have a basic grasp of logic.

Hey hey kylie and thank you for your reply Lets have some fun

I know you love a challenge!

I would like to put forward a challenge to you. I propose 'the super fun time kylies logic challenge'.

Logic is reason conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity. One must have the quality of being logically or factually sound (.eg to have regard to what is actually the case; in relation to fact.)

Logic must be based on a valid reason or good judgement, weighed on the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.

I will make a statement.

You can have a personal relationship with God through Jesus Christ!

What do you think about this statement? (.eg in a logical, sensible way.)

Thank you

 

[DogmaHunter]

You will notice that no one is bemoaning this finding claiming that it threatens the theory

Ow, I'm sure a couple of the loons over at AiG, Discovery Institute and what-not, will be doing exactly that.

In fact, that's probably where he heared about it.

 

[DogmaHunter]

Hey hey kylie and thank you for your reply Lets have some fun

I know you love a challenge!

I would like to put forward a challenge to you. I propose 'the super fun time kylies logic challenge'.

Logic is reason conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity. One must have the quality of being logically or factually sound (.eg to have regard to what is actually the case; in relation to fact.)

Logic must be based on a valid reason or good judgement, weighed on the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.

I will make a statement.

You can have a personal relationship with God through Jesus Christ!

What do you think about this statement? (.eg in a logical, sensible way.)

Thank you

What is the "available body of facts" that that statement would be based on, showing it true or valid?

And note the word "facts". It does not say "claims" or "anecdotes".

 

[DogmaHunter]

but this fossil also violate the phylogeny since its appeare too early:

Tiktaalik - Wikipedia

That fossil was found by prediction of age, anatomy and locality. And that prediction was based on evolution.

So, no.