tas8831
Well-Known Member
- May 5, 2017
- 5,611
- 4,000
- 55
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Married
So totally weird - James seems to have missed TWO responses:
As you imply that you know the science, please do explain:
1. how long the Cambrian explosion lasted.
2. How long the PRE_Cambrian lasted.
3. Which creationist website told you "every current complex phylum appeared all together at one time in the fossil record", and explain why you accepted that claim at face value.
I suggest, given your fondness for facts and science, that you inform your YEC sources that they lied to you.
Just one easily-found falsification re: only sponges in the pre-Cambrian:
The Ediacaran Period
"Some are most like cnidarians, worms, or soft-bodied relatives of the arthropods. Others are less easy to interpret and may belong to extinct phyla. But besides the fossils of soft bodies, Ediacaran rocks contain trace fossils, probably made by wormlike animals slithering over mud."
Patently absurd! I can see why you ignored my question as to YOUR background! LOL!
At this point, I am expecting to see some quoted science below:It's interesting you do not quote the science, so allow me.
... but all I saw was paraphrased creationist website disinformation.The Cambrian Explosipn is how every current complex phylum appeared all together at one time in the fossil record. This contradicts what Charles Darwin hypothesized with his ToE of long time and slow, slow, slow evolution of lifeforms. The Darwinists went uh, uh, uh as they were dumbfounded. They stated that this was 540 million years ago and claimed it was the Big Bang of life.
As you imply that you know the science, please do explain:
1. how long the Cambrian explosion lasted.
2. How long the PRE_Cambrian lasted.
3. Which creationist website told you "every current complex phylum appeared all together at one time in the fossil record", and explain why you accepted that claim at face value.
Furthermore, there is not fossilized evidence of life, except for sponges, just below the Cambrian layer.
I suggest, given your fondness for facts and science, that you inform your YEC sources that they lied to you.
Just one easily-found falsification re: only sponges in the pre-Cambrian:
The Ediacaran Period
"Some are most like cnidarians, worms, or soft-bodied relatives of the arthropods. Others are less easy to interpret and may belong to extinct phyla. But besides the fossils of soft bodies, Ediacaran rocks contain trace fossils, probably made by wormlike animals slithering over mud."
Atheist scientists claim this is due to contamination. Above the Cambrian layer, no new species ever appears.
Patently absurd! I can see why you ignored my question as to YOUR background! LOL!
More lies... Poor fellow - you have been deceived. Why do you take the claims of other creationists at face value when it is SOOOO easy to prove that they are wrong (and likely wrong on purpose, i.e., deceptive)?It's no wonder the finder, Charles Walcott of the Smithsonian Institute, put it under wraps.
Upvote
0