- Mar 16, 2004
- 22,024
- 7,364
- 60
- Faith
- Calvinist
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Democrat
Whatever you think of Zionism, one thing they believed was that they were entitled to the land Promised Abraham in Genesis:
Biblical Boundaries of the Land of Israel Genesis 15:18, 17:8
The Wadis of Egypt is the area where the Nile branches out like a root system and it mixes with the salt water of the Mediterranean. If you notice Cairo, the capitol of Egypt sits at the mouth of the wadi. Of course the Euphrates runs through the middle of Iraq, ancient Babylon sat where the Tigris and the Euphrates came together. This promise would include all of Syria, Lebanon, Jordon and a significant portion of Saudi Arabia. So when someone mentions Zionism in passing, understand how close they were at the end of the 7 days war of potentially acquiring much, if not most of the territory promised Abraham. This isn't a conspiracy theory, it's an historical fact, there was nothing stopping Israel from taking Cairo and seizing control of the Suez Canal. In fact the preemptive strike of Israel on Egypt was over use of the Suez Canal.
The term 'Zionism', is often heard in connection with conspiracy theories, like the Illuminati. Understand, this is not some tin foil had conspiracy theory, Zionists believe they are entitled by divine right to Syria, Jordon, Lebanon and significant portions of Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Iraq. Israel had demonstrated that it is capable of defeating Syria, Lebanon and Egypt in a phenomenally short space of time, 1 week.
Does anyone remember the claim of Iraq have Weapons of Mass Destruction, including nuclear weapons? The Bush Administration, Tony Blair the British Prime Minister and Benjamin Netanyahu all told us Saddam was pursuing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruct, we invaded and found none:
This is not some pipe dream, this is something the US along with Israel is perfectly capable of doing, we have done it. Some would argue it's even Biblical, but is this a viable and active strategy to conquer and control the heart of the Middle East? The implications or positively Apocalyptic in their implications, of course the UN is not likely to sign off on such a thing. I could build a dynamite end time scenario based on this and still might. I'm just curious what kind of a reaction this gets in political context.
So what do you think, is the Zionist vision of expanding Israel from the Nile River to the Euphrates a threat to the stability of the Middle East, or an effective and viable way to achieve it?
Grace and peace,
Mark
On that day the Lord made a covenant with Abram and said, “To your descendants I give this land, from the Wadi of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates. (Gen. 15:18).
Here is what that would look like on a map:
Biblical Boundaries of the Land of Israel Genesis 15:18, 17:8
The Wadis of Egypt is the area where the Nile branches out like a root system and it mixes with the salt water of the Mediterranean. If you notice Cairo, the capitol of Egypt sits at the mouth of the wadi. Of course the Euphrates runs through the middle of Iraq, ancient Babylon sat where the Tigris and the Euphrates came together. This promise would include all of Syria, Lebanon, Jordon and a significant portion of Saudi Arabia. So when someone mentions Zionism in passing, understand how close they were at the end of the 7 days war of potentially acquiring much, if not most of the territory promised Abraham. This isn't a conspiracy theory, it's an historical fact, there was nothing stopping Israel from taking Cairo and seizing control of the Suez Canal. In fact the preemptive strike of Israel on Egypt was over use of the Suez Canal.
The term 'Zionism', is often heard in connection with conspiracy theories, like the Illuminati. Understand, this is not some tin foil had conspiracy theory, Zionists believe they are entitled by divine right to Syria, Jordon, Lebanon and significant portions of Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Iraq. Israel had demonstrated that it is capable of defeating Syria, Lebanon and Egypt in a phenomenally short space of time, 1 week.
Does anyone remember the claim of Iraq have Weapons of Mass Destruction, including nuclear weapons? The Bush Administration, Tony Blair the British Prime Minister and Benjamin Netanyahu all told us Saddam was pursuing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruct, we invaded and found none:
There is no question whatsoever that Saddam is seeking and is working and is advancing towards the development of nuclear weapons. No question whatsoever. (Benjamin Netanyahu)
This isn't just a history lesson and I'm certainly not trying to concoct a conspiracy theory. This is real, Trump said during his campaign that we should have kept the oil in Iraq:
This is not some pipe dream, this is something the US along with Israel is perfectly capable of doing, we have done it. Some would argue it's even Biblical, but is this a viable and active strategy to conquer and control the heart of the Middle East? The implications or positively Apocalyptic in their implications, of course the UN is not likely to sign off on such a thing. I could build a dynamite end time scenario based on this and still might. I'm just curious what kind of a reaction this gets in political context.
So what do you think, is the Zionist vision of expanding Israel from the Nile River to the Euphrates a threat to the stability of the Middle East, or an effective and viable way to achieve it?
Grace and peace,
Mark
Last edited: