The Holy Spirit will not be taken out of the way for no one can be saved without the drawing of the Holy Spirit.
You have just spoken the truth and at the same time violated one of the basic claims of modern Dispensational Theology.
.
Upvote
0
The Holy Spirit will not be taken out of the way for no one can be saved without the drawing of the Holy Spirit.
There is nothing in the text which says when the following people accept Christ.
Rev 12:11 And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death.
That would be "your derided adulterated opinion".
.
You prove nothing as you have shown you do not understand the point - the purpose or the reason that there will be a Great trib to begin with 0 but since you deny Jesus will reign on earth you have shown there is not much about it that you understand
Rev 12:11 And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death.
Rev 12:12 Therefore rejoice, ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time.
Rev_3:12 Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name.
.
You have just spoken the truth and at the same time violated one of the basic claims of modern Dispensational Theology.
.
4. Not all dispensationalists believe that about the Holy Spirit and it really doesn’t matter.
We are in general agreement according to this post. However, the Holy Spirit was poured out for the Church, and indwells the true Church (all redeemed Jews and Gentiles in one Body).7. The Holy Spirit will not be taken out of the way for no one can be saved without the drawing of the Holy Spirit.
I asked you, nicely; not like your accusations of 'blindness', to provide a verse that says God will take His people to heaven. You fail to do so and your tactic of demanding that I prove my case, is an indictment against you.You are blinded and cannot see it , You cannot find not even one verse that proves what you say has merit -
It is the 'rapture to heaven' believers who force their views onto scripture.-that is forcing your views on scripture to suit your own desire
You 'raptureists' are hot on abusive remarks, but cold on solid Biblical proofs of your theory.You can disagree but you can’t rebut the truth. If you think you can then read Post #838 to riberra which he couldn’t rebut.
It does matter, because it reveals how the doctrine has been changed over time in an attempt to make it better align with scripture.
It is like trimming rotten fruit.
However, in this case the rot goes all the way to the core.
You have correctly said that we are now under the New Covenant of Christ.
However, other Dispensationalists on this forum recently argued that the New Covenant only applies to the Jews during the millennium.
One of their chief arguments revolved around the KJV translation of the Greek word "diatheke" as "testament" in some places and "covenant" in other places.
They tried to ignore Hebrews 12:22-24, because it destroys their argument.
They are New Covenant deniers.
This "Covenant Confusion" has been very damaging to the modern Church, because the New Covenant links the Old Testament to the New Testament.
(Jeremiah 31:31-34, Hebrews 7:12, Hebrews 8:6-13, Hebrews 10:16-18, Hebrews 12:22-24, 2 Corinthians 3:6-8)
.
7. Nobody denies the NC connection to the church or the New Testament connection to the Old Testament or vice versa.
Not sure what this video about the moon god has to do with anything other than you are trying to show you are confused.
I asked you, nicely; not like your accusations of 'blindness', to provide a verse that says God will take His people to heaven. You fail to do so and your tactic of demanding that I prove my case, is an indictment against you.
I have plenty of scripture proving that we Christians never leave this earth. John 3:13 Eventually heaven will come to us. Revelation 21:1-7
It is the 'rapture to heaven' believers who force their views onto scripture.
You 'raptureists' are hot on abusive remarks, but cold on solid Biblical proofs of your theory.
It is bad enough to believe in such a false teaching, but to promote it with such fervor, displays a questionable motivation. Why must rapture believers be so vehement in their attempts to rebut those who disagree?
Why say we will remain on earth if we reject a rapture? How unchristian and plain disgusting is that?
I asked you, nicely; not like your accusations of 'blindness', to provide a verse that says God will take His people to heaven. You fail to do so and your tactic of demanding that I prove my case, is an indictment against you.
I have plenty of scripture proving that we Christians never leave this earth. John 3:13 Eventually heaven will come to us. Revelation 21:1-7
It is the 'rapture to heaven' believers who force their views onto scripture.
You 'raptureists' are hot on abusive remarks, but cold on solid Biblical proofs of your theory.
It is bad enough to believe in such a false teaching, but to promote it with such fervor, displays a questionable motivation. Why must rapture believers be so vehement in their attempts to rebut those who disagree?
Why say we will remain on earth if we reject a rapture? How unchristian and plain disgusting is that?
kerasI asked you, nicely; not like your accusations of 'blindness', to provide a verse that says God will take His people to heaven. You fail to do so and your tactic of demanding that I prove my case, is an indictment against you.
ThanksThis man denies it.
He claims that it may be Moses who brings the New Covenant to the Jewish people.
Another member of this forum used this video last week to claim that the New Covenant was not in effect yet, and that it did not apply to the Church.
.
The New Covenant has always been in force since the testator of the New Testament died at Calvary Hebrews 9:16-17.
It is today and will be through the tribulation.
This belief is not dispensationalism. So what is your point? There are extremes to each belief of most system.
How do you manage to see the ''CHURCH RAPTURED IN HEAVEN'' in the text of Revelation 4:1; Revelation 5:10 ? - using intensive imagination gymnastic- or maybe being under the influence of illegal substance (funny tobacco) can give that result.riberra,
10. Proper exegesis shows the rapture will happen before the tribulation Revelation 4:1; 5:10 `
Something described to happen AT THE LAST TRUMP 1 Corinthians 15:51-52 which will be The TRUMP OF GOD (VOICE OF GOD) SOUNDING THE RESURRECTION AND THE GATHERING OF THE BELIEVERS 1 Thessalonians 4:15-17 cited in the text to happen UNTO THE COMING OF THE LORD ,can very hardly happen ''BEFORE'' THE TRIBULATION .and 1 Thessalonians 4:15-17; 1 Corinthians 15:51-52 back it up as a Pre-Tribulation rapture of dead and living believers.
See above, i have proved that you see things which are not written in the text...and you call that exercise of yours proper exegesis ?... Hmm !So you have no evidence to prove your view except in your own context and not the biblical context in what I have shown in proper exegesis.
You can believe what you want but I have seen no proper evidence in a proper rebuttal or otherwise. Jerry kelso
Condescension is better than abuse and inappropriate comments, as you do.You should stop with your condescending demeanor and just prove your case
The point is that you cannot have it both ways.
You claimed that nobody believes the New Covenant is not now in effect.
We just found out that you were wrong on that point.
There is good reason for proponents of Dispensational Theology to deny the New Covenant.
Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant, modern Dispensational Theology falls apart.
The New Covenant: Bob George
.
Condescension is better than abuse and inappropriate comments, as you do.
Until YOU come up with a scripture that says God will take His people to heaven, then I will continue to oppose the rapture as a false teaching.
That Enoch and Elijah went to heaven does not prove a general rapture removal to heaven of the Church in the last days. Actually; if those two really did go to be with God, is disputable from careful studies. Moses and David died and remain in their graves. All the Prophets and the martyrs souls are kept in heaven, awaiting the last trump, when everyone who has ever lived will be Judged. Revelation 20:15-18
Your attempts to make John 3:13 mean something other than what it plainly says, is another indictment against you.
Jesus said several times that people cannot go to heaven and He prayed to the Father: I do not pray You to take them out of this world, but to keep them from the evil one. John 17:15
There is still time for all who have been taken in by false teachings, to change their minds and believe the truth of God's plans for His people. And although wrong beliefs don't cause a loss of salvation, it will be far better to not be in the dark. 1 Thessalonians 5:1-11