razzelflabben
Contributor
you are misrepresenting what I said...hell is torment, I said that, depending on the definition we can even say hell is torture as in trying to eat the meal she made was pure torture...but!!!!! that does NOT mean that God is torturing anyone. Hell is the consequence of sin not the punishment as such God is NOT a torturer, He is a judge who upholds the law.Wow, if the imagery and concept of eternal Hell, being thrown into fire and consumed forever is not torture, then no one has ever been tortured on earth. Torture then, doesn't have a meaning. You are implying that if someone on earth could be tortured, Hell would be a lesser punishment. Also many who are tortured and/or in pain or starving would then prefer the less severe existence of torment in Hell. Hell would not be a severe detourant but an alternative and relief from some earthly life conditions.
Absolutely NOT...that is a misconstruction of what I said and that should be obvious given the correction I just offered. Please do NOT reinvent what I said to suit your bias.You are trying to lessen the severity, make it sound not so bad - "Oh, its not really torture, just torment_ forever."
Actually I do NOT believe there are enough words to describe how bad hell is...see, you are trying to lessen what I said he hell is by making this false claim about what I said. It all boils down to our understanding who what or who goes to hell and why rather than the horrors of hell.This is human nature, to change the concept of eternal Hell. You don't like it, so you lessen the severity - "It's not so bad, God wouldn't torture people ... just torment them forever."
huh??? How does anything in this address what I said...here is a hint for you...I believe that we don't know nearly as much about hell as we think we would or should like to know. What we do know is that it is torment and eternal and that death and hell are thrown into the lake of fire. Oh, we also know that hell was not created for man but for the demons. Beyond that we don't know all that much....what we can add to our understanding is the purpose for hell, which again is the consequence of sin not the punishment for it. As such God is NOT the torturer that you are trying to make Him out to be here. He simply "reads the names in the book of life" and based on that hands out the sentence the law requires. You are trying to paint the judge out as being a torturer because he hands out the sentence to the criminal. Forget the law, forget the jury, forget everyone but the judge...since the judge hands out the sentence the law requires he is torturing the criminal, right?! Of course not...which is what I pointed out about God and hell. To point out that the judge hands out the sentence the law requires does not reduce the bad things about jail as you also tried to claim here...so please once again I ask you politely to stop reinventing what I said and if you want to discuss what I said then do so based on what I said not on what you want to reinvent me to have said.What the heck is the difference?
Hell is severe and it should be a deterrent and btw it's worse than any kind of torture or torment on earth except one, burning to death.
This is why I have also searched the scriptures and reasoned through this concept and have found that the word "eternal" is and must be misinterpreted. You can't burn to death in fire endlessly. You can't be destroyed over and over. If it was an eternal punishment with only torment, then scripture wouldn't include the words destruction or perish and specific instructions and imagery of being thrown into a fire and burned. No, it would just include outer darkness, apart from all that is good, misery, the torment of knowing what you missed out on, etc. So what do you do about the fire, brimstone, destruction and DEATH? By default, to try to grasp it, people are forced to redefine death itself to not mean the end. Oh, so what is it a new life of torment forever? So what scholars have done is assign a symbolic meaning to it all, "It must be a spiritual existence and place and not literally physical fire, but a spiritual fire - the burning torment or something. How could there be fire in outer darkness they postulate - is it dark fire? Fire that really doesn't destroy and a place where the soul is sustained in this torment forever is abstract. See, there's definitely a mystery, and something is just not right with this traditional view, it's not crystal clear.
see above...and compare it to this passage...Rev. 20:14The only clear understanding available is that it is real fire, it is real Lake of Fire that destroys both body and soul, a real end to existence and not eternal at all.
Upvote
0