• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

My favorite argument for the existence of God

Status
Not open for further replies.

xianghua

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2017
5,215
555
44
tel aviv
✟119,055.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Single
No. Snowflakes do not go through the same process of evolution that animals go through.

i never said it is. i just said that if a bicycle will appeared in front of our eyes by a natural process it will still be a bicycle. do you agree or disagree?
 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,626
82
St Charles, IL
✟347,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
i never said it is. i just said that if a bicycle will appeared in front of our eyes by a natural process it will still be a bicycle. do you agree or disagree?
You realize you are going nowhere with this, don't you? You can spin all the fantasies you want, imagine any kind of an organic wooden robot penguin, play all sorts of linguistic gotcha games, but it won't work. Functional complexity in itself is not evidence of design. Period.
 
Upvote 0

FrumiousBandersnatch

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2009
15,405
8,144
✟356,992.00
Faith
Atheist
That matter, energy and especially life is eternal, takes far more faith than "God did it all."
AFAIK, no-one seriously maintains that matter or life can be eternal - the conditions thought to hold at the big bang preclude that. The same applies to energy in some hypotheses (the net energy of the universe is zero, which suggests a universe can be generated from a zero-energy metric, and other aspects of known physics support the idea).

How can there be various theoretical models for an eternal cosmos?
Because we have incomplete data. The models are hypotheses and depend on differing assumptions. The principle is the same as if you see a tiny light moving across the night sky - you could formulate a number of hypotheses to explain what it was and/or where it came from - it might be a satellite, or an aircraft, or a meteor, or a balloon, or a drone, or an insect, etc. You could then try to support or eliminate each hypothesis by a closer examination of the information you have (how fast is it? is it steady or blinking?, does it make a noise?, etc.), or trying to obtain additional information.

Either it was or it wasn't.
One would like to think so...

Although there are some ideas that involve the universe being closed in time, so time has a beginning and an end, and the universe just is (i.e. completely independent and self-contained, with no before or after, and nothing 'outside').

It's tempting to think that if you can't visualise the ideas or wrap your head around them, they can't be real, but quantum mechanics has shown us that isn't always the case; sometimes we just have to rely on the mathematics.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

FrumiousBandersnatch

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2009
15,405
8,144
✟356,992.00
Faith
Atheist
i dont talk about a bicycle with the ability to reproduce. just a regular bicycle that evolve in front of our eyes. you will call it a bicycle or not? by the way: english isnt my native so i may not understand some of your words (just as a note).
A regular bicycle can't evolve (if you mean evolve like living things evolve). A bicycle that could evolve would not be a regular bicycle. Also, only populations of very rapidly reproducing things (e.g. bacteria) can evolve in front of our eyes, and even then it takes weeks or months to become apparent.

If a regular bicycle is modified in the bike shop, that is not evolution in the sense we've been discussing. You could call the developments and technology changes in bicycles since they were first invented 'evolution', but that's the general sense of evolution as simply 'progressive change'; it's not evolution as in the TOE, which involves the results of the selection of heritable changes in reproducing populations. To conflate or confuse the two would be a mistake.

If you don't understand something I say, just tell me and I'll try to explain.
 
Upvote 0

Kylie

Defeater of Illogic
Nov 23, 2013
15,069
5,309
✟327,545.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
i dont talk about a bicycle with the ability to reproduce. just a regular bicycle that evolve in front of our eyes. you will call it a bicycle or not? by the way: english isnt my native so i may not understand some of your words (just as a note).

How many times do you need to be told? Evolution requires reproduction!
 
Upvote 0

Michael

Contributor
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
25,145
1,721
Mt. Shasta, California
Visit site
✟320,648.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
If robots can make copies of themselves, and those copies are varied from the parents, with traits of the parents being passed to the offspring, and if there is some selective pressure which favours some variations and not others, then they would probably have some sort of evolutionary process.

But it wouldn't be biological evolution.

Unless of course she decides to add a few biological elements to her offspring. :) There could actually be some form of "selective pressure" in a Terminator scenario where humans don't get along with these new machines. She might choose to pass on traits that are likely to help her offspring survive in specific conditions, including "non hostile" traits and tendencies too. I suspect that they will be designing and building their own offspring sooner or later. That's kinda scary to think about.
 
Upvote 0

Kylie

Defeater of Illogic
Nov 23, 2013
15,069
5,309
✟327,545.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Unless of course she decides to add a few biological elements to her offspring. :) There could actually be some form of "selective pressure" in a Terminator scenario where humans don't get along with these new machines. She might choose to pass on traits that are likely to help her offspring survive in specific conditions, including "non hostile" traits and tendencies too. I suspect that they will be designing and building their own offspring sooner or later. That's kinda scary to think about.

Perhaps.

But then, it wouldn't be a bicycle anymore, would it?
 
Upvote 0

xianghua

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2017
5,215
555
44
tel aviv
✟119,055.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Single
A regular bicycle can't evolve (if you mean evolve like living things evolve). A bicycle that could evolve would not be a regular bicycle. Also, only populations of very rapidly reproducing things (e.g. bacteria) can evolve in front of our eyes, and even then it takes weeks or months to become apparent.

.

i dont talk about evolution but about a special process that can make a bicycle in front of our eyes. i guess that you agree that even in this case it will be a bicycle. right?
 
Upvote 0

FrumiousBandersnatch

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2009
15,405
8,144
✟356,992.00
Faith
Atheist
i dont talk about evolution but about a special process that can make a bicycle in front of our eyes. i guess that you agree that even in this case it will be a bicycle. right?
Yes - processes that can make bicycles can make bicycles... :doh:

Hint: They're usually in factories or workshops.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: DogmaHunter
Upvote 0

doubtingmerle

I'll think about it.
Site Supporter
Jan 28, 2003
10,002
2,549
Pennsylvania
Visit site
✟562,891.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Yes - processes that can make bicycles can make bicycles... :doh:

Hint: They're usually in factories or workshops.
Ok, after all this discussion we reach the conclusion that bicycles are made by bicycle makers. Is this thread finally getting somewhere? ;)
 
Upvote 0

littotes60

Active Member
Oct 4, 2015
118
128
65
✟2,626.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Yes - processes that can make bicycles can make bicycles... :doh:

Hint: They're usually in factories or workshops.

When two bicycles love each other very much sometimes they...
 
Upvote 0

xianghua

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2017
5,215
555
44
tel aviv
✟119,055.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Single
Yes - processes that can make bicycles can make bicycles... :doh:

Hint: They're usually in factories or workshops.

i talking about a natural process in this case.

If you don't understand something I say, just tell me and I'll try to explain.

i said it in general that i may not understand every word here. just to let you know that i will not check every word that i dont understand in a translator (its just take me too much time). so i will continue to response even if i dont understand every word. but thanks anyway.
 
Upvote 0

FrumiousBandersnatch

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2009
15,405
8,144
✟356,992.00
Faith
Atheist
i talking about a natural process in this case.
There are no natural processes that can make bicycles, or that could conceivably make bicycles. Bicycles are manufactured.

If you see a bicycle and you don't know where it came from, you can be sure that it was manufactured.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.