Not sure what that has to do with the subject since we were talking about the flesh of Jesus. His flash profited us all.And the flesh profits nothing. John 6:63 Mary has no spiritual relevance.
Upvote
0
Not sure what that has to do with the subject since we were talking about the flesh of Jesus. His flash profited us all.And the flesh profits nothing. John 6:63 Mary has no spiritual relevance.
Who said anything about the eternal Father?I disagree. Jesus was a part of God we could identify with. No one can conceive God the Father.
The point would be that these uninspired books are in no way binding on the church or on mankind.
I am not so sure that's true. There are people who reject Paul's letters and other books.We all agree on the Protestant books
Didn't Mary give birth to Jesus rather than merely to his flesh?Jesus is God and Mary gave birth to his flesh.
What do you mean when you say that Jesus was not God while on Earth?Jesus was not God while on earth per say.
I don't know how the books were chosen, I use the bible with 66 books, but about one book in the Catholic bible, I'm not bashing by the way I just know it's false.Lots of books were left out of the Bible when it was 'assembled' by the Catholic Church via the Holy Spirit all those years ago.
Now, does it mean that the many 'Gospels' 'letters' etc are not worth reading or should not be read? Are there many truths to be taught by reading them or are there too many lies contained within them?
I don't want this to be a Catholic bashing thread.
Let's just discuss my questions. Thank you
The Word, is the eternal Spirit of Jesus. The flesh of Jesus was created within the womb of his mother, Mary. The flesh within the womb was both man and God and was given the name, Jesus at his birth.Didn't Mary give birth to Jesus rather than merely to his flesh?
What I mean is Jesus on earth was human. As a human he still prayed and talked to God, His Father. Hence they are two separate people. In heaven currently, They are still two separate "beings" if you will.What do you mean when you says that Jesus was not God while on Earth?
Lots of books were left out of the Bible ....
If you look carefully at what God has to say about the number of books in the Bible you'll notice right away that there is not a single verse stating how many books He declared to be inspired. That garbage teaching of "inspired" versus "uninspired" comes from the same pulpits of men who have no authority over how many books God wants in His Bible. The only book I've read where God mentions an explicit amount of books is from 2 Esdras or known by others as 4 Esdras where God tells Ezra the prophet to write 94 books: 24 are for the public to read while the 70 are only for the wise. The only other book which mentions an explicit number can be found in The Acts of Pilate where the elders tell Pilate that in their seventy books (i.e. old testament) they found that Jesus would come to die on the cross after 5,500 years: and this prophecy can be found in the 1 Book of Adam and Eve.Lots of books were left out of the Bible when it was 'assembled' by the Catholic Church via the Holy Spirit all those years ago.
Now, does it mean that the many 'Gospels' 'letters' etc are not worth reading or should not be read? Are there many truths to be taught by reading them or are there too many lies contained within them?
I don't want this to be a Catholic bashing thread.
Let's just discuss my questions. Thank you
Interesting point. Did your mother give birth to you rather than merely your flesh. Like myself we merely become cognisant over time, from a blank to being self aware. Can an eternal God divest himself of his nature and be born just like one of us. Except in Jesus' case his memories go beyond what we are capable of understanding. John 3:12 John 3:8Didn't Mary give birth to Jesus rather than merely to his flesh?
I would like to read The Acts of Solomon (per 1 Kings 11:41)