Gosh, with you having "read 1000s of studies and experiments...worked in labs for decades...read many "books on Evolution" " I wouldn't have though you'd need help pointing out the basic, elementary errors in H.Y.'s videos.
Well, I'll do the first one, for gits and shiggles.
0 min 6 sec:
6 seconds in and we have the first basic mistake. Bipedalism is not a 'dilemma' for evolution and there is ample record of how it developed through our ancestors over the past 5 million years. Strike one;
0 min 20 sec:
Nope, humans don't have a "perfect and flawless skeletal system". The jaw and our spines are the sort of 'good enough' kludges that evolution explains. Same with our hands. Strike two;
0 min 40 sec:
Nope, "evolutionists" don't claim that bipedalism evolved from a four legged 'ape gait' to two legged up right walking. The evidence is that humans ancestors developed bipedalism without the knuckle walking we associate with apes (chimpanzees and gorillas). Strike three.
0 min 55 sec
Nope, the claims about bipedal evolution are well evidenced and far from "impossible".
1 min 10 sec
Humans and apes actually share a lot of locomotive similarities, particularly humans and chimpanzees.
1 min 15 sec:
"Human bipedalism" is not shared with any extant life form, as there are no other humans. However human ancestors known to be bipedal include (but are not limited to) Sahelanthropus; Orrorin; Ardipithecus; Australopithecus; Homo habilis; Homo erectus; Neanderthal; Denisovans.
Then there's bipedalism in other mammals, birds, lizards and other species.
Look, I could do the rest of the video, but I REALLY have better thinks to do than beat up on creationist propaganda. From a sample of 6 claims in 75 seconds, all of them were wrong.