Can True born again BELIEVERS lose their spiritual POSITION in Christ?

aiki

Regular Member
Feb 16, 2007
10,874
4,349
Winnipeg
✟236,538.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Because as it relates to us, can you be saved and have no inheritance in the kingdom of God? Maybe I'm confusing myself needlessly....

I think what the parable indicates is that our behaviour cannot propel us out of the goodwill of our Heavenly Father, nor can it eradicate our fundamental relationship to Him as His adopted children, born into His family via what the Bible calls the second birth. Paul has something useful to say here:

1 Corinthians 3:13-15
13 each one's work will become clear; for the Day will declare it, because it will be revealed by fire; and the fire will test each one's work, of what sort it is.
14 If anyone's work which he has built on it endures, he will receive a reward.
15 If anyone's work is burned, he will suffer loss; but he himself will be saved, yet so as through fire.


Did you get that last bit? "He himself will be saved, yet so as by fire." A believer's works can be burned up entirely at the Day of Judgment and he'll still be saved. Doesn't sound here like our works have anything to do with our salvation, which is what Paul explains quite clearly in other places in his various letters to the Early Church.

Selah.
 
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
39,291
20,290
US
✟1,476,962.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Because as it relates to us, can you be saved and have no inheritance in the kingdom of God? Maybe I'm confusing myself needlessly....

Legally (or should I say "legalistically"), none of us has an inheritance in the Kingdom of God. God had to act beyond the Law to provide us with an inheritance, which is why Paul describes us as being "adopted."

In our day, adoption is what happens to minors. To Paul's Graeco-Romans audience, a wealthy man adopted another suitable grown man to be his heir when he determined his own children were unfit to inherit his estate. The adopted son was then given the family signet ring and wore the family cloak.

That's what the father in Jesus' parable would have to do--he'd have to adopt that son again as a son.
 
Upvote 0

-57

Well-Known Member
Sep 5, 2015
8,699
1,957
✟70,048.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
No. This is backwards and reversed.
Actually what I presented is the full Gospel message rather than severely pruning it down to attempt to distance oneself from the fact requires far more than just a knowledge that I need to say "I believe" Jesus saves me. Having faith is just a start, and we are asked in saying "I believe" to agree (intellectually that) there is so much more to a Christian walk than just that - "help thou my unbelief".

To strip the Gospel message back to focus only on "I believe" undermines a mission given men who spent three years learning things too great in number for the Bible to hold and the NT depicts them going out to "teach". What is to be taught if all that is needed to know is one need to say "I believe Jesus saves me". The "I believe, help thou my unbelief" cries out there is so much more that needs to be believed in faith.

John 3:16 is all that is needed. There is no pruning down the gospel. The Christian walk begins when one is saved. The Christian walk is a direct byproduct of ones salvation....not a means of obtaining it.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: RDKirk
Upvote 0

DrBubbaLove

Roman Catholic convert from Southern Baptist
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2004
11,336
1,728
64
Left coast
✟77,600.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
John 3:16 is all that is needed. There is no pruning down the gospel. The Christian walk begins when one is saved. The Christian walk is a direct byproduct of ones salvation....not a means of obtaining it.
Correct a Christian walk is only possible obtaining the Grace of God sufficient for faith. However to me "salvation" in any sense that matters has to be a statement of what happens to me in the next life.
So while a Catholic, if they thought the Protestant way, could say I was saved when Baptized, am being saved and hope to be saved when I leave this life - it is a journey rather that is not over until it is over. If I publicly deny my faith as Saint Peter did (not talking about under pain/torture), then I need to get right with God for having done that - as He said that will get me rejected before His Father. And it is not too late until it is over - thief on the cross for example.

Am certain saying "I believe" and following Jesus for years, listening and obeying Him without question, maybe even doing wonders in His name including converting others, all of this could be said evidence of a Christian walk. But to me, as long as I can still mess that up horribly - and I know I can and have - my walk is not done yet. So I need to finish this walk through life as best I can (warts and all) to have a hope of God looking at me as "pleasing to Him".

And I am talking about me here, not judging another. If I end my life as the gentleman in Cleveland seems possibly about to, am unclear how I could expect God to tell me "good job, never mind that last bit".
Perhaps he could excuse me somewhat if I was high or had mental impairment issues...etc., that clouded my intent/judgement in what hopefully in me should otherwise have been a violated conscious in committing such an act. But if I willfully violate my nature in ending my life that way, I cannot see God saying to me that He sees me a "good and faithful servant".
[adding - I do not agree it can NOT be viewed as pruning to make the NT message simply "I believe". ]
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

-57

Well-Known Member
Sep 5, 2015
8,699
1,957
✟70,048.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Correct a Christian walk is only possible obtaining the Grace of God sufficient for faith. However to me "salvation" in any sense that matters has to be a statement of what happens to me in the next life.
So while a Catholic, if they thought the Protestant way, could say I was saved when Baptized, am being saved and hope to be saved when I leave this life - it is a journey rather that is not over until it is over. If I publicly deny my faith as Saint Peter did (not talking about under pain/torture), then I need to get right with God for having done that - as He said that will get me rejected before His Father. And it is not too late until it is over - thief on the cross for example.

Am certain saying "I believe" and following Jesus for years, listening and obeying Him without question, maybe even doing wonders in His name including converting others, all of this could be said evidence of a Christian walk. But to me, as long as I can still mess that up horribly - and I know I can and have - my walk is not done yet. So I need to finish this walk through life as best I can (warts and all) to have a hope of God looking at me as "pleasing to Him".

And I am talking about me here, not judging another. If I end my life as the gentleman in Cleveland seems possibly about to, am unclear how I could expect God to tell me "good job, never mind that last bit".
Perhaps he could excuse me somewhat if I was high or had mental impairment issues...etc., that clouded my intent/judgement in what hopefully in me should otherwise have been a violated conscious in committing such an act. But if I willfully violate my nature in ending my life that way, I cannot see God saying to me that He sees me a "good and faithful servant".

Water baptism doesn't save you.
Secondly, what you speak of is not being saved...but sounds more like the on going act of sanctification as you walk in Christ.
 
Upvote 0

DrBubbaLove

Roman Catholic convert from Southern Baptist
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2004
11,336
1,728
64
Left coast
✟77,600.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I'm not sure what you mean here...If the father had passed away while the son was off living a profligate life, the Prodigal would still have been his father's son and vice versa. Death does not undo this kind of relationship. Now, as I said, if what you propose had happened, if the father had died without reconciling with his son, there would have been no opportunity for the restoration of their fellowship one to the other but their relationship to each other as father and son would not have altered.
Analogies are never perfect reflections of reality. Most of us don't think we have to physcially have to consummate a marriage to Jesus in a human sense of that word. It was the idea expressed that is most important.
One either inherits the Kingdom by being "engaged" to the only human that has that inheritance when we leave this life or we are not engaged. Whether we ever were or not is not really relevant. We better be when we leave this life. [/quote]But, you see, what you've written here puts the onus upon the believer to sustain their salvation. Basically, it is works salvation. If I don't act to preserve my "alignment" with God, then I will die a lost man. How does this not amount to being saved by my efforts rather than the finished, perfect work of Christ on the cross? [/quote] Not in my view. The onus is on God applying a Grace, just like He did in giving us faith in the first place. So if we sin afterwards, He can apply a Grace to clean us up again - but He would only do that if we repent and ask for it. It still requires His action - not ours. And we never get to that point anyway unless we first with no help at all of ourselves - a free Gift of Grace that gives us faith.
I suppose. But the Bible never uses such an analogy to talk about salvation. The Bible talks about adoption, about justification, and redemption, and reconciliation but never does Scripture equate our being saved with being married.
Again a human analogy. The point is the bride is always seen as free to run away from the Groom. And there is plenty of talk in the Bible about enduring, growing, nurturing, increasing, strengthening...etc our FAITH, which in context of being a bride would mean not running away. The faith given is like the bride's engagement. In a proper sense, she can do nothing to make the Man give her a ring.
But this is quite unlike what Scripture says is the case when God saves us. We aren't, before God saves us, a bride He has chosen to wed. We are walking corpses spiritually, dead in trespasses and sins, (Eph. 2:1) without the capacity even to desire to be saved. Unless and until God acts to redeem us, we remain in this state of spiritual deadness. There is no initiative we take toward God that He hasn't motivated in us. Our salvation is all His doing. A rather different situation than that of a bride and groom about to marry.
We are spiritually dead before being given the "ring" of faith that makes us a bride. We can do nothing to obtain that ring ourselves, has to be given us by God. Then we have faith - and that just as start as Saint Paul says in Romans.
Technically all mankind is made to be bride, but we tend (fallen nature)not to act like it or even want to be for some of us. Many Christians, self included, also tend to downplay how abhorent our lives must be to God.

“I have been trying to make the reader believe that we actually are, at present, creatures whose character must be, in some respects, a horror to God, as it is, when we really see it, a horror to ourselves. This I believe to be a fact: and I notice that the holier a man is, the more fully he is aware of that fact.”
C.S. Lewis The Problem of Pain​
And, again, what you're describing here is, essentially, works salvation which the Bible flatly and explicitly rejects.
Titus 3:5-7
5 not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to His mercy He saved us, through the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Spirit,
6 whom He poured out on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Savior,
7 that having been justified by His grace we should become heirs according to the hope of eternal life.
Given I have repeatedly said our faith is not something we can "work for" if we throw that ring away we cannot work to get it back. If we just get our dress dirty but keep our ring safe, then with our faith (ring), we should want to clean ourselves up to be sure we remain living a life that can be said "pleasing to Him". Even cleaning ourselves up we cannot do ourself
Well, what the RC church believed is rather contradicted by Scripture which tells us we can know (and must know) we are saved before we arrive at the Judgment Seat of Christ.

2 Corinthians 13:5
5 Examine yourselves as to whether you are in the faith. Test yourselves. Do you not know yourselves, that Jesus Christ is in you?...


1 John 5:11-13
11 And this is the testimony: that God has given us eternal life, and this life is in His Son.
12 He who has the Son has life; he who does not have the Son of God does not have life.
13 These things I have written to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life, and that you may continue to believe in the name of the Son of God.


John 5:24
24 "Most assuredly, I say to you, he who hears My word and believes in Him who sent Me has everlasting life, and shall not come into judgment, but has passed from death into life.


1 John 3:14
14 We know that we have passed from death to life, because we love the brethren. He who does not love his brother abides in death.


Selah.
That is the typical Protestant response yes.
I noticed in Timothy we have left NOT underlined the text in 1 John that would be relevant to a fuller (and Catholic) understanding of those words. He wrote a lot of things, not JUST to offer them assurance of salvation, but also other things that they MAY continue having that assurance.
Catholics do also have an assurance of "salvation" just not certitude - which is why we don't call every Catholic leader that dies a Saint even though we can and do think of them as being in a peaceful rest from this life like Lazarus - we cannot possibly know this true unless God reveals it is so. So we are all saints, whereas someone known to be in Heaven, like an Apostle for example, is a Saint in an eternal sense.
 
Upvote 0

DrBubbaLove

Roman Catholic convert from Southern Baptist
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2004
11,336
1,728
64
Left coast
✟77,600.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Water baptism doesn't save you.
Secondly, what you speak of is not being saved...but sounds more like the on going act of sanctification as you walk in Christ.
A shower or bath or running through a sprinkler does not save you. But properly understood, a Baptism is another application of Grace, a free gift from God like our faith is. So we are not just going through motions, if done in faith there is a Grace provided for a supernatural spiritual benefit - the remission of all prior sins.
 
Upvote 0

Kenny'sID

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 28, 2016
18,185
7,003
69
USA
✟585,394.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Wow! Some moderator should help out with this "off point" outreach and 2 person discussion.

You know what Ron, under the circumstances, one would think no one would have objected to those posts that late at night when nothing else was going on, but quite to the contrary.

I guess not being cold, being selfless and taking care of those who need it, as already mentioned here, are part of the "works" I personally think are required for salvation, but then again, I know some do not subscribe to that.

I learned a lesson today, and thanks for bringing up my mistake, Ron...you created a window into reality that without your help, would never have been possible. :oldthumbsup:

Matthew 7:16 - Ye shall know them by their fruits.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DrBubbaLove
Upvote 0

aiki

Regular Member
Feb 16, 2007
10,874
4,349
Winnipeg
✟236,538.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
One either inherits the Kingdom by being "engaged" to the only human that has that inheritance when we leave this life or we are not engaged. Whether we ever were or not is not really relevant. We better be when we leave this life.

As I said, this is not an analogy the Bible employs. It doesn't need to. A better description of our relationship to God and of what transacts between Him and us at the moment of salvation is found in Scripture. We are wayward sheep brought back into the fold; we are the spiritually dead made adopted children of God; we are rebellious and wicked enemies of God turned ambassadors of Christ. But no where does the Bible speak of those who have been saved as fiancees of God. And this is because the engagement analogy is an inept one. It doesn't reflect well the facts of our salvation and the reality of our relationship to God.

Not in my view. The onus is on God applying a Grace, just like He did in giving us faith in the first place. So if we sin afterwards, He can apply a Grace to clean us up again - but He would only do that if we repent and ask for it. It still requires His action - not ours. And we never get to that point anyway unless we first with no help at all of ourselves - a free Gift of Grace that gives us faith.

God does not apply a grace in giving us faith to believe; He imparts His Spirit who convicts us of sin, illuminates our understanding of His truth, and gives us faith to believe the Gospel. Our walk with God is from beginning to end a relational one, not a mechanical one. God doesn't give us things, spiritual tools, whereby we are enabled to be His children; He gives us Himself in the Person of His Spirit and imparts to us all we need thereby. Without His work in us we cannot act positively toward God. We just don't - in and of ourselves - have it in us to do so. If we take godly action, it is only because God by His Spirit has enabled us to such action. Our salvation and our subsequent life in Christ, then, are all God's doing, not ours. As Christ said to his disciples "without me you can do nothing." (Jn. 15:5)

Again a human analogy. The point is the bride is always seen as free to run away from the Groom.

This is your own made-up analogy, not one the Bible offers and as such it rather twists the truth of things. The process by which a woman is affianced to a man is quite different on many levels from the way in which God works to draw us to Himself. The two relationships are not parallel in either their formation or maintenance. No where in Scripture will you find a verse speaking of salvation that says, "The bride is free to run away from the groom."

Given I have repeatedly said our faith is not something we can "work for" if we throw that ring away we cannot work to get it back.

Salvation, being born-again, is not reduced to faith in Scripture. Faith is not the essence of our salvation; Christ is.

1 John 5:11-12
11 And this is the testimony: that God has given us eternal life, and this life is in His Son.
12 He who has the Son has life; he who does not have the Son of God does not have life.


Inasmuch as our salvation is a work of God, not something we have accomplished for ourselves, we haven't the power to undo it. God did not ask our permission in order to begin to work to save us and He does not require our permission to preserve His salvation of us.

If we just get our dress dirty but keep our ring safe, then with our faith (ring), we should want to clean ourselves up to be sure we remain living a life that can be said "pleasing to Him".

It is not our faith that prompts us to right living but the Holy Spirit of God dwelling within us. Any desire to live rightly is prompted in us by the Spirit. We can't say, then, that we are cleaning ourselves up. God cleans us up as we get out of His way and let Him do so. He converts us and He transforms us. From beginning to end, our life as a redeemed child of God is His achievement, not ours.

That is the typical Protestant response yes.

It is also an entirely biblical response.

we cannot possibly know this true unless God reveals it is so.

Which He has done in His word, the Bible (see my last post).

Selah.
 
Upvote 0

Blade

Veteran
Site Supporter
Dec 29, 2002
8,167
3,992
USA
✟630,797.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Ron....what you personally believe...is it GODS word? We each see something different at times yet we ACT talk like WE are right and you just got it wrong.. duh! Any one can read quote John 3:16...yet this does not mean they are saved. Rom 10:9-10... with the HEART man believes and the mouth confession is made. So all we SEE HEAR is flesh. Since we can not see the heart in which GOD only sees we do not know about the other. We take them at there word.. we believe all things.

Quoting tons of verses does not = YOU/ME are right. See YES it is NOT works by which we are saved...yet... it is not just words. ALL things have become new.. the OLD man is passed off/put off and the new man which after GOD is created in righteousness and true holyness.There is a REAL CHANGE that happens. What we USE to want to do..we do not.. we no longer LOVE this world.. we want nothing of it.

But remember we are FREE. This GIFT is not forced down anyone mouth. Deeper.. and NO FEAR ok? There are those that have touched the powers to come.. they KNOW JESUS IS REAL! No doubt..they were BORN again..yet made the CHOICE to walk way. No one is FORCED to stay. When Jesus returns and sets foot and gathers the NATIONS at that time. There are those that said..believed JESUS IS LORD...yet Jesus will say "I NEVER NEW YOU".

Now forgive me ..well I seen people talking about this and yet you also and asked about "position" Not sure what you meant. There will be many that get to heaven just no rewards what so ever.

The WORD.. He does not talk about fallen angels and how they have no hope ..for no reason. To THINK we are saved no matter what.. not a path I will walk. I have no fear of being lost..yet...its not MY thinking that gets me in. JESUS IS REAL! If this SALVATION is SO REAL... and you wonder ..then ask Him

I have never wondered "once saved" nor "CAN I LOSE my salvation". Those thoughts never came from HIM..so why would I think them or entertain them? I believe He is what He said He was.. in all that is written. And I die each day so HE can live. I do not seek sinning.. I seek His kingdom 1st and His righteousness...and ALL things are then added to me. He so far has NEVER broke His word with me.. and ALWAYS keeps it. Be like a child..and...YOU are not right..and THEY are all wrong (to all) HE is right period. He walked this earth.. no sin..they called HIM good...what did HE say? yeah.. we are not....HE IS.. and we are saved.. PRAISE GOD and HE IS COMING to get us
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

DrBubbaLove

Roman Catholic convert from Southern Baptist
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2004
11,336
1,728
64
Left coast
✟77,600.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
As I said, this is not an analogy the Bible employs. It doesn't need to. A better description of our relationship to God and of what transacts between Him and us at the moment of salvation is found in Scripture. We are wayward sheep brought back into the fold; we are the spiritually dead made adopted children of God; we are rebellious and wicked enemies of God turned ambassadors of Christ. But no where does the Bible speak of those who have been saved as fiancees of God. And this is because the engagement analogy is an inept one. It doesn't reflect well the facts of our salvation and the reality of our relationship to God.
Well it may have been overstated perhaps, but properly speaking Christ is the Bridegroom, and the entire Church, the Body of Believers is His Bride to be presented to His Father, as pleasing to Him, which we could not be members of that Church unless the summation of our lives were pleasing to Him. So we inherit rather like children of the Bride (the Church) His Inheritance.

The analogy of marriage and the talk of inheriting something that belongs to Him is to emphasize nothing we can do, no work we can make will enable us to inherit the Kingdom of God by our own hand(plz read we don't do it our self). Only by being aligned with the only Man to have that inheritance can we hope to share in that inheritance, which is His Kingdom. So in that sense we, the Body of Believers, a Bride of Christ.
Ps 22 For the kingdom is the LORD'S: and he is the governor among the nations.
Matt 4 From that time onwards, Jesus began to preach; Repent, he said, the kingdom of heaven is at hand.
Gal 5 19 It is easy to see what effects proceed from corrupt nature; they are such things as adultery, impurity, incontinence, luxury, 20 idolatry, witchcraft, feuds, quarrels, jealousies, outbursts of anger, rivalries, dissensions, factions, 21 spite, murder, drunkenness, and debauchery. I warn you, as I have warned you before, that those who live in such a way will not inherit God’s kingdom.
Matt 25 31 When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, he will sit down upon the throne of his glory, 34Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:
Mk 2 19 To them Jesus said, Can you expect the men of the bridegroom’s company to go fasting, while the bridegroom is still with them?
Matt 22 1 And Jesus once more spoke to them in parables; 2 Here is an image, he said, of the kingdom of heaven;
8 After this, he said to his servants, Here is the marriage-feast all ready, and those who had been invited have proved unworthy of it.
12 My friend, he said, how didst thou come to be here without a wedding-garment? And he made no reply. 13 Whereupon the king said to his servants, Bind him hand and foot, and cast him out into the darkness, where there shall be weeping, and gnashing of teeth. 14 Many are called, but few are chosen.[2]
John 3 28 You yourselves are my witnesses that I told you, I am not the Christ; I have been sent to go before him. 29 The bride is for the bridegroom; but the bridegroom’s friend, who stands by and listens to him, rejoices too, rejoices at hearing the bridegroom’s voice; and this joy is mine now in full measure
2 Col 11 1 If you would only bear with my vanity for a little! Pray be patient with me; 2 after all, my jealousy on your behalf is the jealousy of God himself; I have betrothed you to Christ, so that no other but he should claim you, his bride without spot,
Is 61 The deliverance he sends is like a garment that wraps me about, his mercy like a cloak enfolding me; no bridegroom so proud of garland that crowns him, no bride of the necklace she wears.
Is 62 “or the LORD delights in you and will claim you as his bride
“Then God will rejoice over you as a bridegroom rejoices over his bride
Jer 2 “I remember how eager you were to please me as a young bride long ago,
Rev 19 Alleluia, the Lord our God, the Almighty, has claimed his kingdom; 7 let us rejoice and triumph and give him the praise; the time has come for the wedding-feast of the Lamb. His bride has clothed herself in readiness for it; 8 hers it is to wear linen of shining white; the merits of the saints are her linen.
Eph 5 29 and so it is with Christ and his Church; 30 we are limbs of his body; flesh and bone, we belong to him.[4] 31 That is why a man will leave his father and mother and will cling to his wife, and the two will become one flesh. 32 Yes, those words are a high mystery, and I am applying them here to Christ and his Church.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

DrBubbaLove

Roman Catholic convert from Southern Baptist
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2004
11,336
1,728
64
Left coast
✟77,600.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
God does not apply a grace in giving us faith to believe; He imparts His Spirit who convicts us of sin, illuminates our understanding of His truth, and gives us faith to believe the Gospel. Our walk with God is from beginning to end a relational one, not a mechanical one. God doesn't give us things, spiritual tools, whereby we are enabled to be His children; He gives us Himself in the Person of His Spirit and imparts to us all we need thereby. Without His work in us we cannot act positively toward God. We just don't - in and of ourselves - have it in us to do so. If we take godly action, it is only because God by His Spirit has enabled us to such action. Our salvation and our subsequent life in Christ, then, are all God's doing, not ours. As Christ said to his disciples "without me you can do nothing." (Jn. 15:5)
In most Christian Theology the Holy Spirit is God. So my saying God gives a Christian a Gift of Grace in order to have FAITH to believe - is just not that different than someone attempting to describe HOW God does this.

How my saying He does this for us is rendered to our doing it by someone else simply attempting to explain How He does it, makes no sense to me. I said He does it, they say how they see Him doing it and claim I said "we do it":scratch::doh:.
To me this reply seems to denote a really really desperate desire to see anything Catholic as just wrong. Perhaps I am mistaken.
But there is nothing about what I said, that it is God alone that is responsible for giving us faith, that should make one think or be understood as I have said we get that ourselves.

I was a Baptist a long time. There was a lot of emphasis on just saying "I believe", the Sinners Prayer....etc. and not once did I ever here someone tell me that the only way I can really believe, is if God first gives me His Grace to believe. Otherwise all I have really expressed at most is agreement/assent, which even the demons assent to Who God is. Without that Grace applied before my utterance of having faith my words may mean nothing more than am embarrassed to not say it because all these people around me have said it and expect me to.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

DrBubbaLove

Roman Catholic convert from Southern Baptist
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2004
11,336
1,728
64
Left coast
✟77,600.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
This is your own made-up analogy, not one the Bible offers and as such it rather twists the truth of things. The process by which a woman is affianced to a man is quite different on many levels from the way in which God works to draw us to Himself. The two relationships are not parallel in either their formation or maintenance. No where in Scripture will you find a verse speaking of salvation that says, "The bride is free to run away from the groom."

Analogy aside, there would be no need for warning Christians as the NT does if a total loss of faith and so our means of justification were not a real potential.

Rather puts at least some doubt on those who do not endure.

Mt 24 13 but that man will be saved who endures to the last.
If doom can slip upon the believer in the Final days, why would there be no escape if faith cannot be lost.

2 Th 5 1 There is no need, brethren, to write to you about the times and the seasons of all this; 2 you are keeping it clearly in mind, without being told, that the day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night. 3 It is just when men are saying, All quiet, all safe, that doom will fall upon them suddenly, like the pangs that come to a woman in travail, and there will be no escape from it.

If no loss possible, why watch and be ready, why speak of God wanting something we claim we already have “won”.
2 Tim 5 4 Whereas you, brethren, are not living in the darkness, for the day to take you by surprise, like a thief; 5 no, you are all born to the light, born to the day; we do not belong to the night and its darkness. 6 We must not sleep on, then, like the rest of the world, we must watch and keep sober; 7 night is the sleeper’s time for sleeping, the drunkard’s time for drinking; 8 we must keep sober, like men of the daylight. We must put on our breastplate, the breastplate of faith and love, our helmet, which is the hope of salvation. 9 God has not destined us for vengeance; he means us to win salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ, 10 who has died for our sakes, that we, waking or sleeping, may find life with him. 11 Go on, then, encouraging one another and building up one another’s faith.

How can we go back from something we already “won” and what is the “teaching” thing if belief is all I need?
2 John 7 Be on your guard, or you will lose all you have earned, instead of receiving your wages in full.[2] 9 The man who goes back, who is not true to Christ’s teaching, loses hold of God; the man who is true to that teaching, keeps hold both of the Father and of the Son.
 
Upvote 0

DrBubbaLove

Roman Catholic convert from Southern Baptist
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2004
11,336
1,728
64
Left coast
✟77,600.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Salvation, being born-again, is not reduced to faith in Scripture. Faith is not the essence of our salvation; Christ is.
If we were talking simply of assent/belief, like a demon believing God is God then there might be a point. Obviously a demons belief God is God does nothing to jusfity or "save" him.

The FAITH we, or at least I was speaking about, is a Gift of Grace from God that allows one to surrender oneself totally to Him, and by growing in that virtue (faith) we believe not only in God, but also in ALL that He has revealed to mankind - which as the Bible says is also needed for our benefit and something for which our faith strengthens our desire to both know Him and want to know all He has revealed.

The privilege of faith justifies us, and is a Gift, a Grace from God leading to more Gifts and fuller knowledge and desire to do His Will:

2 Peter 1 1 Simon Peter, a servant and apostle of Jesus Christ, to those who share with us the common privilege of faith, justified as we are by our God and Saviour Jesus Christ;[1] 2 Grace and peace be yours abundantly, as you gain fuller knowledge of God, and of Christ Jesus our Lord. 3 See how all the gifts that make for life and holiness in us belong to his divine power; [the gifts] come to us through fuller knowledge of him, whose own glory and sovereignty have drawn us to himself![2] 4 Through him[3] God has bestowed on us high and treasured promises; you are to share the divine nature, with the world’s corruption, the world’s passions, left behind.
Inasmuch as our salvation is a work of God, not something we have accomplished for ourselves, we haven't the power to undo it. God did not ask our permission in order to begin to work to save us and He does not require our permission to preserve His salvation of us.
Not sure how many times I have to say God does the work before everyone believes me.
Since the "work" is not finished until we finish this life, am unclear how to claim something is over until it is over.​

In any sense at all of a God giving someone a Gift of Faith that justifies them to Himself, the Apostles leaving their lives in being given that FAITH to respond to His Call and "follow Him", obey Him, believe Him, work for Him...etc. for three years has to qualify. Had any of them lost their head during that time, as Saint John the Baptizer did, we should have no doubt they would have joined Jesus cousin in Paradise as just as the thief did "that day" on a long ago Friday similar to the one just past.
Yet, at the end of that ministry Saint Peter did the one thing God told Him would get Him booted with the goats before His Father. So the "work" in Saint Peter's life was interrupted, but fortunately for us his life did not end there and we see him later with his faith having been restored to him (A WORK OF GOD - not his).

Now some here keep trying to tell me the Apostles could not have been considered justified/righteous as we think of ourselves today because, after all Jesus hadn't died yet. But how can we fathom a concept of justification/righteousness in God's eyes apart from having first been given by Him the Faith to respond to His Call and believe God and totally commit our self to Him - which is exactly what the Apostles were doing in spades for three years!!!!!

To me it makes no sense to suggest those men were not Heaven bound the moment they responded by the Faith given to them to His Call to them. It also makes no sense that after Saint Peter denied Him three times that he was still Heaven bound as God told Him that would get Him turned away.
It is not our faith that prompts us to right living but the Holy Spirit of God dwelling within us. Any desire to live rightly is prompted in us by the Spirit. We can't say, then, that we are cleaning ourselves up. God cleans us up as we get out of His way and let Him do so. He converts us and He transforms us. From beginning to end, our life as a redeemed child of God is His achievement, not ours.
I can agree the Spirit moves and works in us. But the Spirit would not dwell in our temple absent the Faith God already Gave us. The point I was making is that our Faith is what allows us to respond to God's call to give oneself totally over to Him, which includes meaning a desire to know Him (Good), which means if sin - our own spirit should convict us immediately because we did something against that desire to know Him. At least if we have not already made a habit of a particular sin, in which case we may need a kick from the Holy Spirit.
It is also an entirely biblical response.
As you should have learned at CF or in life already, most Christians hold their beliefs as Biblical. The point of my saying it was typical, is that I feel like my post was not even read. When I repeatedly say GOD DOES IT and the reply is basically "NO, you are wrong to say we do it our self because God does it and does it this way" - then the Protestant is telling me they have not only not listened/read what I said - they don't even want to consider we may have said much the same thing because the Catholic must be wrong.
Which He has done in His word, the Bible (see my last post).
Saying "the Bible says" is easy. Making it say something without contradicting what else it says is harder. Making it say something that contradicts what the Apostles taught their disciples is harder still. I would not be a Catholic today if I agreed with everyone that says "the Bible says".

The Bible says things like hope, will be, may be.... and it rather warns a lot that we need to protect the Gift of FAITH we have been GIVEN (read "not our doing" please this time please) or we could be like the seed (of faith sown - read not our doing again please) fallen that sprouts up but then fails.
And that concept that we could fall, not just sin but sin very badly, is the only thing that makes sense of things like Saint Paul talking about needing to view this life as a race that needs to be run to the end. You typically cannot successfully finish a race if you cheat, or give up or fall down and not get up or turn and go the wrong way.

Now I guess you could argue that if we knew we were among the elect destined for Heaven, it would not matter is we sin because the knowledge means we would at some point recover before the race is over so we will finish it successfully. And that there is why many Christians, including Catholics, talk about an assurance of salvation and not certitude. Not judging is part of why we talk about not really knowing/seeing the heart of another so we certainly hope others we know going before us are in Heaven, but that is it unless God reveals it is true somehow - which does not happen a lot.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

aiki

Regular Member
Feb 16, 2007
10,874
4,349
Winnipeg
✟236,538.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
we could not be members of that Church unless the summation of our lives were pleasing to Him.

This isn't what the Bible says. We are not included as members of Christ's Bride, the Church, we are not saved, by the "summation" of our living. Confession of sin, repentance from a life lived apart from God, and trust in Christ as one's Saviour and Lord are at the heart of the Gospel. If one is saved by the sum total of the content of their living, then one is not saved by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone (Eph. 2:8, 9) as Scripture says. Again, what you're describing is works-salvation, not the Gospel.

no work we can make will enable us to inherit the Kingdom of God by our own hand(plz read we don't do it our self). Only by being aligned with the only Man to have that inheritance can we hope to share in that inheritance, which is His Kingdom.

Well, now you appear to be contradicting yourself. "No work will enable us to inherit God's kingdom," you say and then you assert that only by aligning with Christ can we share in his inheritance. From what you've written in earlier posts, by "alignment" you mean godly living which is a work we do. Scripture, though, says salvation is a gift of God obtained by saving faith in Christ totally apart from any godly living or "alignment" we perform.

In most Christian Theology the Holy Spirit is God. So my saying God gives a Christian a Gift of Grace in order to have FAITH to believe - is just not that different than someone attempting to describe HOW God does this.

I don't agree. I think too often Christians think God gives them spiritual things (faith, love, joy, peace, etc.) in order to live the Christian life when in fact what God gives us to live rightly before Him is Himself in the Person of His Spirit. There is no separation between the Fruit of the Spirit and the Spirit Himself; God's power is given to us in the Person of Spirit. God does not dole out to us bits and pieces ("graces") of love, and joy, and peace that are a kind of spiritual currency separate from Himself. No, God's love, joy and peace, His faith, is found only in Him. To want these things is to want God; to ask for more peace or spiritual power is to ask for more of God. This may seem like nit-picking to you, but understanding what I have explained here is, as far as I'm concerned, terribly important (in no small part because so many believers separate God from the spiritual fruit and power He imparts to them).

I was a Baptist a long time. There was a lot of emphasis on just saying "I believe", the Sinners Prayer....etc. and not once did I ever here someone tell me that the only way I can really believe, is if God first gives me His Grace to believe.

Well, if you'd attended the Baptist churches that I have, your experience in this regard would have been very different.

Rather puts at least some doubt on those who do not endure.

Mt 24 13 but that man will be saved who endures to the last.

And the only reason any man "endures to the end" is because he is genuinely saved and thus motivated and empowered to endure by the Holy Spirit.

If doom can slip upon the believer in the Final days, why would there be no escape if faith cannot be lost.


2 Th 5 1 There is no need, brethren, to write to you about the times and the seasons of all this; 2 you are keeping it clearly in mind, without being told, that the day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night. 3 It is just when men are saying, All quiet, all safe, that doom will fall upon them suddenly, like the pangs that come to a woman in travail, and there will be no escape from it.

This passage does not say that doom will fall upon believers. Paul writes of "men" who say "All is quiet, all is safe" in a generic sense; he is not meaning Christian brethren else he would write "you" as he does in the verses preceding verse 3.

If no loss possible, why watch and be ready, why speak of God wanting something we claim we already have “won”.

2 Tim 5 4 Whereas you, brethren, are not living in the darkness, for the day to take you by surprise, like a thief; 5 no, you are all born to the light, born to the day; we do not belong to the night and its darkness. 6 We must not sleep on, then, like the rest of the world, we must watch and keep sober; 7 night is the sleeper’s time for sleeping, the drunkard’s time for drinking; 8 we must keep sober, like men of the daylight. We must put on our breastplate, the breastplate of faith and love, our helmet, which is the hope of salvation. 9 God has not destined us for vengeance; he means us to win salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ, 10 who has died for our sakes, that we, waking or sleeping, may find life with him. 11 Go on, then, encouraging one another and building up one another’s faith.

Why should believers "watch and keep sober"? Because, as Paul explains, this is the proper behaviour of those who know Christ. What's more, if it were a natural thing for Christians to live watchfully and soberly and to armor themselves with faith, love, and the hope of salvation, Paul would not have to write to those he calls brethren, those he thinks of as saved, to urge them toward such things. Paul no where in this passage warns the believers to whom he is writing of the loss of their salvation. He simply explains the proper way for those who are saved to behave and why. In fact, Paul remarks in the passage above that "God has not destined us for vengeance" which seems to support a once-saved-always-saved position.

How can we go back from something we already “won” and what is the “teaching” thing if belief is all I need?

2 John 7 Be on your guard, or you will lose all you have earned, instead of receiving your wages in full.[2] 9 The man who goes back, who is not true to Christ’s teaching, loses hold of God; the man who is true to that teaching, keeps hold both of the Father and of the Son.

I prefer the NKJV rendition of this verse and the passage in which it stands:

2 John 1:7-9
7 For many deceivers have gone out into the world who do not confess Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.
8 Look to yourselves, that we do not lose those things we worked for, but that we may receive a full reward.
9 Whoever transgresses and does not abide in the doctrine of Christ does not have God. He who abides in the doctrine of Christ has both the Father and the Son.


In context, the apostle John is warning of the deception of those who denied Jesus as the Messiah incarnate (likely Gnostics). John calls them "deceivers and antichrists" and urges his readers to avoid believing their heresy as it would result in the loss of a "full reward." This does not mean necessarily a loss of one's salvation, however (see 1 Corinthians 3:15). Verse 9 simply confirms that accepting false teaching concerning Christ cannot lead to genuine salvation. It does not indicate a SAL (saved-and-lost) doctrine.

Since the "work" is not finished until we finish this life, am unclear how to claim something is over until it is over.

Well, here's where we diverge: I don't see that the Bible teaches that our salvation is only completed at the end of our earthly lives. Paul writes of salvation as a completed fact, not a future eventuality. So does Peter and the apostle John.

Ephesians 2:4-6
4 But God, who is rich in mercy, because of His great love with which He loved us,
5 even when we were dead in trespasses, made us alive together with Christ (by grace you have been saved),
6 and raised us up together, and made us sit together in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus,


Colossians 1:12-14
12 giving thanks to the Father who has qualified us to be partakers of the inheritance of the saints in the light.
13 He has delivered us from the power of darkness and conveyed us into the kingdom of the Son of His love,
14 in whom we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of sins.


Titus 3:5-7
5 not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to His mercy He saved us, through the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Spirit,
6 whom He poured out on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Savior,
7 that having been justified by His grace we should become heirs according to the hope of eternal life.


1 Peter 1:22-23
22 Since you have purified your souls in obeying the truth through the Spirit in sincere love of the brethren, love one another fervently with a pure heart,
23 having been born again, not of corruptible seed but incorruptible, through the word of God which lives and abides forever,


1 John 3:1-2
1 Behold what manner of love the Father has bestowed on us, that we should be called children of God! Therefore the world does not know us, because it did not know Him.
2 Beloved, now we are children of God; and it has not yet been revealed what we shall be, but we know that when He is revealed, we shall be like Him, for we shall see Him as He is.


1 John 3:14
14 We know that we have passed from death to life, because we love the brethren. He who does not love his brother abides in death.


1 John 5:13
13 These things I have written to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life, and that you may continue to believe in the name of the Son of God.


And so on.

Yet, at the end of that ministry Saint Peter did the one thing God told Him would get Him booted with the goats before His Father. So the "work" in Saint Peter's life was interrupted, but fortunately for us his life did not end there and we see him later with his faith having been restored to him (A WORK OF GOD - not his).

What's pertinent to our discussion in Peter's story is that having denied Christ, he is never treated by the risen Christ as apostate. He is never openly and explicitly condemned by Jesus. Peter appears to be accepted by Christ as a disciple when they meet again after Jesus' crucifixion. This doesn't seem, then, to support an SAL position. Mind you, since salvation was only possible post-Calvary and Peter's denial happened prior to Christ's crucifixion and resurrection, Peter could not have lost his salvation by denying Christ as he did. At the time of his denial of Christ, Peter had no salvation to lose. Also, Peter did not deny Christ because of a lack of faith but because of a fear of harm.

Now some here keep trying to tell me the Apostles could not have been considered justified/righteous as we think of ourselves today because, after all Jesus hadn't died yet. But how can we fathom a concept of justification/righteousness in God's eyes apart from having first been given by Him the Faith to respond to His Call and believe God and totally commit our self to Him - which is exactly what the Apostles were doing in spades for three years!!!!!

Actually, for much of the time the disciples followed Jesus they demonstrated serious confusion or misunderstanding about him and what he had come to earth to do. Certainly, they had no understanding of Jesus as the final, perfect Atonement for sin he had come to earth to be. Whatever they believed about Jesus, they could not have believed in him as their Saviour, as the Lamb of God whose shed blood took away their sin, until after his death on the cross and subsequent resurrection. And since trusting in Jesus as one's atonement is essential to being born-again, none of the disciples could have been born-again prior to that atonement being made. Whatever relationship to Jesus the disciples had before Christ's crucifixion, it was not - and could not - have been as born-again believers.

If you want to contend for the notion that the disciples were all saved before Christ's crucifixion, you must explain why Christ needed to die on the cross. If it was possible for the Twelve to be saved without Christ's crucifixion, why is not possible for all to be saved without the atonement of Christ on the cross?

I can agree the Spirit moves and works in us. But the Spirit would not dwell in our temple absent the Faith God already Gave us.

The Spirit is the faith we have to believe. He is working in our minds and hearts to bring us to faith in Christ long before we are ever saved.

As you should have learned at CF or in life already, most Christians hold their beliefs as Biblical.

Actually, on CF, I encounter many more "believers" offering their opinions than offering biblical wisdom and truth.

When I repeatedly say GOD DOES IT and the reply is basically "NO, you are wrong to say we do it our self because God does it and does it this way" - then the Protestant is telling me they have not only not listened/read what I said - they don't even want to consider we may have said much the same thing because the Catholic must be wrong.

My concern has never been about your Roman Catholicism but about whether or not your statements are biblical. It seems you expect your Catholicism to be an issue whether or not it really is.

And that there is why many Christians, including Catholics, talk about an assurance of salvation and not certitude.

Paul seemed to think certitude about one's salvation was both possible and necessary:

2 Corinthians 13:5
5 Examine yourselves as to whether you are in the faith. Test yourselves. Do you not know yourselves, that Jesus Christ is in you?--unless indeed you are disqualified.


Selah.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

DrBubbaLove

Roman Catholic convert from Southern Baptist
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2004
11,336
1,728
64
Left coast
✟77,600.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
My concern has never been about your Roman Catholicism but about whether or not your statements are biblical. It seems you expect your Catholicism to be an issue whether or not it really is.
I don't know you and cannot speak to your concern or intent. I can reflect only on the posts made here.
What I was saying is that when a Catholic keeps having to repeat the Church teaching that we cannot even have Faith without first having God give it to us, and the rebuttal is essentially that no I am wrong about the Catholic teaching then there must be something besides a concern that my utterance is not Biblical.

Whether or not the issue really is the Catholic must be wrong about their own teachings only the person who keeps claiming this when a Catholic says otherwise can tell us.
 
Upvote 0

DrBubbaLove

Roman Catholic convert from Southern Baptist
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2004
11,336
1,728
64
Left coast
✟77,600.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Paul seemed to think certitude about one's salvation was both possible and necessary:

2 Corinthians 13:5
5 Examine yourselves as to whether you are in the faith. Test yourselves. Do you not know yourselves, that Jesus Christ is in you?--unless indeed you are disqualified.
If one was certain that they are "saved" and so going to Heaven (in future) why would it be necessary to examine ourselves at all?
There are huddles of verses against the idea of certitude. But as the letter to Corinth was brought up, just one verse from Saint in his first letter to them should do to show the idea is indeed that a Christian can be "disqualified".
1 Cor 6
8 Instead, you yourselves cheat and do wrong, and you do this to your brothers and sisters. 9 Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived
 
Upvote 0

DrBubbaLove

Roman Catholic convert from Southern Baptist
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2004
11,336
1,728
64
Left coast
✟77,600.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Actually, on CF, I encounter many more "believers" offering their opinions than offering biblical wisdom and truth.
And I find a lot that seem to think unless others agree with them, their opposing expression automatically becomes just their opinion.
Which is why am glad my expressions of Catholic teachings have several thousand years of solid backing rather than just and only representing "my opinion". I do share opinions, but usually try to express it as such. I can agree that saying "that is just your opinion man" is not a real rebuttal.
As to wisdom and truth, God Himself came to offer that through what He taught the Apostles for three years. If one really thinks that three years of teaching was required to say all we need to know is "our faith alone saves us" then God must be a less effective teacher than I imagined. The whole idea of someone saying "I believe, help thou my unbelief" speaks there is more to know about living a successful Christian life than a simple expression of I believe.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

DrBubbaLove

Roman Catholic convert from Southern Baptist
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2004
11,336
1,728
64
Left coast
✟77,600.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
If you want to contend for the notion that the disciples were all saved before Christ's crucifixion, you must explain why Christ needed to die on the cross. If it was possible for the Twelve to be saved without Christ's crucifixion, why is not possible for all to be saved without the atonement of Christ on the cross?
It is not my contention, it is evident from the whole Bible story. People lived and were judged having lived righteous lives long before the Apostles cam along. A few are shown already enjoying that afterlife, a couple at least even escaping death because they were deemed "righteous". If that does not qualify those people as being "saved" then am unclear what one really means by the term.

Jesus depicts one such dad man already happy in the next life. A dying thief is has been assured he would be happy that day (now that is an example of God giving someone certitude). The righteous dead are depicted same day walking around Jerusalem - surely they were happy before then too and even happier that day!

If being given sufficient faith to respond to Jesus call to drop everything and follow Him, doing that and everything he asked for most of 3 years...etc if that does not qualify those men as both being made righteous and "saved" then I cannot fathom what some Christians think being "saved" means for them.
The Spirit is the faith we have to believe. He is working in our minds and hearts to bring us to faith in Christ long before we are ever saved.
Not sure what "Spirit is the faith" we have to believe means. Yes, God works on our hearts and minds. Certainly in my view of a longer life after one can first be considered made righteous (do I have repeat again God makes us that way), we can in that sense be "saved" long before we die, which obviously marks the end of that opportunity. As well as an end to our ability to screw that up royally.

In the Catholic view, justification is a translation from a state of unrighteousness to a state of righteousness. It is a process. A process that needs to be repeated because most of us make ourselves unrighteous again and need God to fix that again for us. Because it is a process, one is either fully righteous, somewhere in between or not at all. God can fix that, so we can be re-justified.

The very basic difference in our view is the Protestant often states our righteousness is declared by God and that is it period - we are saved - like being given a go to Heaven pass. Whereas the Catholic takes the idea of righteousness further - He actually makes us righteous, as in Holy as Jesus is Holy rather just declaring, seeing, imputing...etc. like a writ of righteousness on us.

Which is why as an evangelical, myself and many others often end up being Baptized several times. The realization comes that we can become so burdened by depth/magnitude of our sins, that we figure we must not have been really "saved" before. We think, if we were we would not have behaved that way. So what we were certain we had before, we are no longer certain we had at all.

So we have people like me going back down front to get really "saved" this time. (twice for me but I saw 3-4 times as not uncommon). The interesting point there, is the idea behind the sinners prayers is an overly simplified short form of the Sacrament of Reconciliation. So in essence the evangelical getting Baptized again is in practice following a process no so different than Catholics, only they just do not view it that way. The idea of certainty requires them to say it is certain, at least until it is not and they conclude they never really were certain - then they can be made certain again (or again and again).
 
Upvote 0