That's right. You see, photosynthesis they can replicate and show step by step how it happens.
That is
completely and utterly incorrect.
If it were true, our energy problems would be over.
Our solar energy technology would be
thousands of times more efficient.
We understand the big picture. We can
not replicate and show "step by step" how plants accomplish this.
It happens every day so there's no need to 'guess' whether or no it does or doesn't happen in the way that science tells us that it does.
That makes no sense and further exemplifies serious misunderstanding in how science works. Observing a phenomena taking place does not, in any way, tell you
how said phenomena is taking place. It doesn't even really tell you if there are actual
causal relationships either. Correlation doesn't imply causation.
A good example is plate tectonics.
The phenomena was observed and basically a fact: "continents" moved around.
But that fact/observation doesn't tell you
how that works. For years, the proposed model of explanation was "continental drift". This turned out to be wrong and was eventually replaced by the model of plate tectonics.
The observations and facts didn't change.
The explanation changed.
So the
theory of photosyntesis, might also turn out to be wrong or incomplete. It's quite unlikely, but it surely can be. Let's assume that tomorrow it is disproved. Just like with continental drift, disproving that theoretical model
will not change the facts.
Clearly, plants require sunlight. Clearly, plants do "something" with those high energy photons.
Evolution, on the other hand, has never been replicated and does not happen everyday
False on both accounts.
Evolution processes are used
every day in every farm and breeding program all over the planet.
Natural evolution also occurs not just
every day, but
every second of every day.
Everytime an organism beats the odds and survives an infection or reproduces or is otherwise succesfull in surviving and spreading its genes... natural selection occured.
Every newborn comes with a set of mutations that it will eventually pass on to off spring (if it survives and breeds).
So yes, natural selection followed by reproduction with modification
happens every second of every day.
and is based on a lot of best guesses of what the evidence that we do have on hand 'could' mean.
Every single theoretical model of explanation in science is based on the available evidence at our disposal within the scope of said model.
These are not "guesses". These are conclusions based on data, which are testable with further data.
God's word says that He made each creature and that they would reproduce after their own kind.
Actually,
humans said that and
claimed they were god's words. You believe those humans.
The evidence however, blows that claim out of the water.
See, that's another thing about science that you don't seem to comprehend...
Science isn't in the business of "proving" things, true.
However, it IS in the business of "
disproving" things.
Science can't tell you with certainty what model is True (capital 'T'). However, it CAN tell you what is WRONG.
And the idea that all species were created as-is, is most definatly wrong.
Even only for the simple reason that we've actually observed speciation taking place. And we understand that process very well.
As I think I was clear to say, I trust science in a lot of things
Except when it says things that don't agree with your faith-based beliefs.
