(I'm focusing here on the questions we've not addressed 20 times)
There are big differences in regards to views on salvation between different Christian faiths. This is simply a statement of fact. For example, you imply here that you believe only a saved person can be baptized. Other faiths believe that baptism is required for a person desiring salvation. Others it has nothing to do with that person's wishes/embracing Christ. Some faiths view salvation as a one time thing (did and done), others a lifelong journey.What were the teachings at the time and what did they claim was the eay to salvation?
Difficult to know, looking at some of the congregations and preachers at the time it is unlikly that they had different views on salvation
What difference would full immersion or sprinkling have made to Smith, he could not have been baptised as he did not know if he was saved. Why did he not read the word on baptism or salvation, this is what everyone else would do right?
He addresses this question directly himself: "For the teachers of religion of the different sects understood the same passages of scripture so differently as to destroy all confidence in settling the question by an appeal to the Bible." (Joseph Smith—History 1)You say he was wondering, well he should have been diligently studying the Word, bringing questions reading commentaries. Is this how we understand doctrine by reading one verse out of context or do we study the bible and compare scripture with scripture?
If you want proof, ask God yourself.You don't do things like this and go against Gods word, Decieve people and claim things no one can prove!
Upvote
0