Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Perhaps, you could show me some Scriptural examples of God's raucous sense of humor, then . . .And thank YOU for that warm and charitable response.
I understand the past pretty well. And the primary lesson to be drawn from it the world over is that religion has to be kept firmly under the control of secular civil authorities, because religious people become fanatical murderers when they have power. So they can't ever have power.
Yes, I can see that you truly never have seen any of the divine sense of humor.
Constantine ended the persecution of the Christian faith. Before he did so Christianity was illegal. Christians died. He didn't make Christianity the state religion, as so many detractors think he did. He made Christianity as legal as Paganism.
He did try to meddle in the faith, true. When Christian bishops were arguing over the teaching of Arius, Constantine summoned all of the bishops to meet in Nicea to hammer it out. But Constantine wanted a compromise position, semi-Arianism. The council rejected what Constantine wanted, totally rejecting Arianism and semi-Arianism. So Constantine's meddling wasn't even effective.
The mythology about Constantine is way thicker than the truth about him.
Unfortunately, then your mastorate was based on myth.I did a Mastorate paper in Early Christian history and that is what my texts told me about Constantine. It depends on what history you read and the extent of the research that you base your views on.
Still wrongAnd yeah I agree he ended the persecution of the christian faith by manifesting a sort of safe version you could say to practice.
Perhaps, you could show me some Scriptural examples of God's raucous sense of humor, then . . .
I think that statement can be made about any Church or denomination - some there are saved. Some perhaps not. Only God knows.
That were neither historical nor facts. If you disagree, then by all means present some evidence from primary sources.
I know you're just being silly because I embarrassed you - bout there is nothing funny about kids getting killed by bears.Well, there's the "Bears of Bashan". A bunch of boys make fun of Elijah's bald head, so God sics a whole pack of bears on them that tear them to pieces. That's pretty funny.
In real life, there's the platypus and the camel, for starters.
That's about as accurate as any other suggestion up to now. ;-)Green jello?
And this kind of ignorance cannot go unanswered . . .Yes. That's correct. The only reason I mentioned Roman Catholics that time is because we're talking about a man's views about that particular denomination. I was raised in both the Roman Catholic AND the Protestant churches, but I never actually gave my life to Christ until I was in college.
Where in the Bible does it say that you should pray to patron saints? Nowhere.
What does the Bible say about praying repetitious prayers? It says not to do it.
What did the Roman pagans do? They prayed repetitious prayers to patron gods.
Conclusion: Roman Catholicism was formed by the merging of Christianity with Roman paganism.
Does this make me think the Roman Catholics are all going to hell? No, it doesn't.
That's about as accurate as any other suggestion up to now. ;-)
While Christianity undoubtedly replaced some pagan celebrations with Christian feasts - this was not a "mixing" of paganism and Christianity as some falsely charge.I think Constantine did change the tone of the Church in the Roman world, but not in the way that anti-Catholics suggest. The eucharist, icons, Mary, saints, etc. were all parts of the Church before Constantine. What Constantine did, was make Christianity respectable, even required, and theologians started having to figure out ways to make the religious ethics more pragmatic. Which is not necessarily a bad thing.
Same for Alberto Ribera, wished his views had gone to the grave with him instead of being picked up by Darby and Scofield and many preachers today.
I think Jack Chick was trying to point out that there is pagan rituals in the RCC form of worship brought in by Constantine.
Still wrong![]()
Hyperbole is not humor.Jesus used humor, it's obvious from seeing his interaction with the religious leaders of his day. Many of his images are obviously meant to be humorous. Like straining a gnat and swallowing a camel, or the image of the blind leading the blind.
It does say to pray for one another, it says God is the God of the living (referring to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob) and it says the prayers of a righteous man are powerful and affective.Where in the Bible does it say that you should pray to patron saints? Nowhere.
It says not to make "vain repetitions as the heathens do". Is there anything vain about repeatedly asking God to have mercy on us?What does the Bible say about praying repetitious prayers? It says not to do it.
Patron gods? What are patron gods?What did the Roman pagans do? They prayed repetitious prayers to patron gods.
So you are posting your opinion, not historical facts. Thank you, that is much less misleading.Conclusion: Roman Catholicism was formed by the merging of Christianity with Roman paganism.
I know you're wrong. Constantine tried to influence the Church but he ultimately failed. He did end the persecution though which allowed the Church to flourish.everyone has their opinion. If you think i'm wrong suit yourself.