The evidence for Evolution.

[The Barbarian]

Macroevolution from microevolution is like saying an ape left Boston, took baby steps and arrived in L.A. as a man.

Creationism is the belief that a man can walk 20 feet, but he can't walk a hundred miles.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Macroevolution from microevolution is like saying an ape left Boston, took baby steps and arrived in L.A. as a man.

And creationists still don't understand how analogies work.

 

[acehighinfinity2015]

Yep. First directly observed speciation was about 1908, I think.

If you think so, you don't know much about mechanics. Tell us which fossils you're talking about, and what you think they say about evolution.

Hey primordial soup, I am talking about macro-evolution do you think I don't know how it works?

Here is the list for you:
Macroevolution - Wikipedia
Speciation - Wikipedia
Microevolution - Wikipedia
Divergent evolution - Wikipedia
Timeline of the evolutionary history of life - Wikipedia

I can tell you the fossil found in Egypt walked with man and said nothing about evolution? Yeah start brainstorming. Perhaps you need your facts completed?

Macroevolution from microevolution is like saying an ape left Boston, took baby steps and arrived in L.A. as a man.

Bahaha that is so true my friend. Happy new year AV!

 

[sfs]

Does real Science show you Macroevolution?

Yes. I hope this clears up your confusion.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Hey primordial soup, I am talking about macro-evolution do you think I don't know how it works?

Here is the list for you:
Macroevolution - Wikipedia
Speciation - Wikipedia
Microevolution - Wikipedia
Divergent evolution - Wikipedia
Timeline of the evolutionary history of life - Wikipedia

I can tell you the fossil found in Egypt walked with man and said nothing about evolution? Yeah start brainstorming. Perhaps you need your facts completed?


Bahaha that is so true my friend. Happy new year AV!

From your own source on Macroevolution:

"Macroevolution is evolution on a scale at or above the level of species,"

In other words, according to your source speciation is macroevolution and that has been observed.

 

[acehighinfinity2015]

Yes. I hope this clears up your confusion.

Hey buddy which part of evolution? Trace it all the way back if you truly studied Science? Gee you guys taking advantage of random chance...coming out of the cracks like roaches left and right lol. Woohoo yabadaba doo!

 

[Subduction Zone]

Hey buddy which part of evolution? Trace it all the way back if you truly studied Science? Gee you guys taking advantage of random chance...coming out of the cracks like roaches left and right lol. Woohoo yabadaba doo!

You really need to learn what you are arguing against. Evolution is not random. And sfs's job is in the sciences. You on the other hand only know enough to shoot yourself in the foot.

 

[acehighinfinity2015]

From your own source on Macroevolution:

"Macroevolution is evolution on a scale at or above the level of species,"

In other words, according to your source speciation is macroevolution and that has been observed.

Trace it back properly buddy and don't cheat! Nice try now I'm bored!

 

[Subduction Zone]

Trace it back properly buddy and don't cheat! Nice try now I'm bored!

I did. I understood that quote. Did you?

 

[acehighinfinity2015]

You really need to learn what you are arguing against. Evolution is not random. And sfs's job is in the sciences. You on the other hand only know enough to shoot yourself in the foot.

Oh dear Darwin please help me?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Oh dear Darwin please help me?

Why would he help you? You truly have no knowledge of biology at all.

 

[Subduction Zone]

ace, you should be trying to learn why over 99% of all biologists and geologists can show you to be wrong. That life evolved is a simple fact. It does not disprove God, it only disproves the mistaken version of God that some Christians have.

 

[acehighinfinity2015]

I did. I understood that quote. Did you?

Oh righty,

....the leg species connected to the knee species, and the knee species connected to the thigh species, and the thigh species connected to the hip species, and Now connect macro and micro species together!

Woo hallelujah hallelujah!

 

[acehighinfinity2015]

ace, you should be trying to learn why over 99% of all biologists and geologists can show you to be wrong. That life evolved is a simple fact. It does not disprove God, it only disproves the mistaken version of God that some Christians have.

Demographics of atheism - Wikipedia
14% Holy smoke screen it's a massive number? And yet how many are scientists? 99% you say?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Demographics of atheism - Wikipedia
14% Holy smoke screen it's a massive number? And yet how many are scientists? 99% you say?

No, 99% of scientists are not atheists. But since they are brighter than the average person the fact that a significantly higher percentage of scientists are atheists than the general population should tell you something.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Oh righty,

....the leg species connected to the knee species, and the knee species connected to the thigh species, and the thigh species connected to the hip species, and Now connect macro and micro species together!

Woo hallelujah hallelujah!

If all you can do is babble you only defeat yourself.

 

[AV1611VET]

Happy new year AV!

You too, my friend!

 

[acehighinfinity2015]

No, 99% of scientists are not atheists. But since they are brighter than the average person the fact that a significantly higher percentage of scientists are atheists than the general population should tell you something.

You shot you own foot buddy. Not a single source? Not even in wiki? Cite your source and please no atheist blog sites or comedians like Bill Maher: https://www.quora.com/Bill-Maher-claimed-that-93-of-scientists-in-the-US-are-atheists-Is-this-true
LOL get out of here

If all you can do is babble you only defeat yourself.

Oh so you won LOL?

Timeline of the evolutionary history of life - Wikipedia
Let's recap. How far did you go? So no one observed the origin? If so, who?

How about you give me your best evidence (emperical) to support macro evolution? Please don't waste my time.

 

[AV1611VET]

No, 99% of scientists are not atheists. But since they are brighter than the average person the fact that a significantly higher percentage of scientists are atheists than the general population should tell you something.

Ya ... they're using the wrong light.

John 8:12 Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life.

 

[Subduction Zone]

You shot you own foot buddy. Not a single source? Not even in wiki? Cite your source and please no atheist blog sites or comedians like Bill Maher: https://www.quora.com/Bill-Maher-claimed-that-93-of-scientists-in-the-US-are-atheists-Is-this-true
LOL get out of here

You made the unsupported 99% claim. Anyone that knows anything about this topic knows that figure is wrong And why quote Bill Maher? It is much closer to 40%:

Scientists and Belief

Oh so you won LOL?

Timeline of the evolutionary history of life - Wikipedia
Let's recap. How far did you go? So no one observed the origin? If so, who?

Please, try to remember your own faulty arguments. You said that macroevolution had not been observed. You were shown to be wrong. You are now trying to move the goalposts which is the same as you admitting that you were wrong, so yes, so far I have won.

How about you give me your best evidence (emperical) to support macro evolution? Please don't waste my time.

Not until you demonstrate that you understand the concept of evidence. Most creationists simply don't get this rather basic idea.