Maybe they have timers on their lights so the lights go on - off - on - off - on - off ... ... ... ... ...Then people on submarines for months at a time have no way
to know what time it is?
Without question, there is no such occurrence of 'evening' and 'morning' - which derives from 'sundown' and 'sunup' - without the Sun.
Pat, people on submarines have clocks (either mechanical or electronic devices which keep track of elapsing time).pat34lee said:Then people on submarines for months at a time have no way to know what time it is?
Sorry Pat, you missed it again. "Morning" is a concept of humanity and derives from the Sun 'coming up'. "Evening" is an associated concept of humanity deriving from the Sun 'going down'. The movement of the Sun is actually a result of the Earth's rotation on its axis while the Sun stays in place relative to the rest of the Solar System.pat34lee said:Obviously, evening and morning do not come from sunrise and sunset, since they came first.
Now you're confusing the Creator with a calendar. At the very least, you're confusing omniscience with timekeeping. The statement here is a selection of words resembling a sentence but carrying no logical meaning.pat34lee said:Anyway, if God can tell the end of days before the creation, he can keep track of days without any help from his creations.
Pat, people on submarines have clocks (either mechanical or electronic devices which keep track of elapsing time).
During the creation period - either six days or ten billion years (give or take an eon) - there were no clocks and no people. Your argument is puerile.
I'm trying to get you to see what your statements mean
when taken to their conclusion. Man is intelligent. God
is not.
That is an arguable statement. At best, it is more or less correct and by some readings, infer a great deal not in the text.pat34lee said:Genesis is not Moses' words, but the words given to him by God.
Completely wrong, but fanatically held to by several generations of ignorance worshippers and science haters. And of course, those who believe those people without study, understanding or thought.pat34lee said:And when God says, "there was evening and there was morning, the first day" when there was yet no sun or moon, he meant literally 24 hours or one day.
All of which is true, and none of which is germane to the discussion at hand. What you're saying is "God knows all and therefore God is bound to MY [pat34lee's] understanding." No, God is not bound by your understanding.pat34lee said:He [referring to God] could not only tell a day or year, but from the beginning, he could tell when you and I were born, and had a plan for us even then. God is the master of all, including time and space, because he created it all. He even knew every language and dialect we would be speaking before a single word was said.
And you are not 'seeing' much. But then, you are maintaining your current record.pat34lee said:I'm trying to get you to see what your statements mean when taken to their conclusion.
This seems to be your attribution to me. Not only did I not say or imply this, it is evidence of your lack of thinking. What you really mean is, "Anyone who disagrees with pat34lee is wrong and dismisses God". That is not the case.pat34lee said:Man is intelligent. God is not.
Correct. There is no "24 hours" without reference to the sun.
AMEIN !There was light prior to the sun.
Correct. There is no "24 hours" without reference to the sun.
Without question, there is no such occurrence of 'evening' and 'morning' - which derives from 'sundown' and 'sunup' - without the Sun.
Hi skywriting,
That's a completely illogical statement. The 24 hours of a day have nothing whatsoever to do with the sun. The time span of a day would still be what it is today without even the existence of the sun. The time span of a day is determined by the speed of rotation of the earth spinning upon its axis. All that is necessary for man to compute the time span of a day is a fixed point upon the earth's surface and the relative position of the earth in the universe. By merely establishing that relative position and the fixed point on the earth, when the earth gets back to that same relative position, a day has passed. We have since divided the time span of the day into 24 hours, although that is not a precise calculation.
God bless you,
In Christ, ted
Sorry, Ted. You are not only wrong, but completely miss the point.miamited said:That's not really correct either. Evening and morning are the same thing as our a.m. and p.m.
Equal? Really? Do expand on that a bit.miamited said:They are merely two equal divisions of the time span of a day.
It comes from our current way of measuring the time of 'day'. Answer the above questions.miamited said:Oddly enough, 12:01 a.m. comes when the sun is nowhere to be seen.
You will never know unless you can answer the above questions - which I learned in grade school, by the way.miamited said:How then, can one say that the sun determines a.m. or p.m.?
This question is breathtaking in the underlying ignorance.miamited said:Similarly, how can one say that the sun determines morning and evening?
Ted, look up the definitions for 'solar day' and 'sidereal day'.miamited said:The time span of a day is determined by the speed of rotation of the earth spinning upon its axis. All that is necessary for man to compute the time span of a day is a fixed point upon the earth's surface and the relative position of the earth in the universe. By merely establishing that relative position and the fixed point on the earth, when the earth gets back to that same relative position, a day has passed.
Sorry, Ted. You are not only wrong, but completely miss the point.
I suppose it's possible you're reverting to the YEC tactic of ignoring - to the point of blotting it out of your mind - anything which interferes with YEC teaching. I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt.
Deal with these questions and I'll take you more seriously:
What is the meaning of A. M. and P. M.? When were those terms adopted and by whom? From where did 'modern man' (those humans alive today) derive the idea of twenty-four equal 'hours' in a 'day' divided into sixty 'minutes' and so on?
Yes,Evening and morning refers to the ending and beginning of a day. Those terms evening and morning when coupled with "day" 1 2,3 etc are a clear indication that those days had an evening and morning and were 24 hours long.
Minus fifty-seven, this is where I came in. You are arguing in circles and ignoring what's already been covered.-57 said:Evening and morning refers to the ending and beginning of a day. Those terms evening and morning when coupled with "day" 1 2,3 etc are a clear indication that those days had an evening and morning and were 24 hours long.
Yes,
but some religions disagree, and perhaps cannot agree without changing religions. (i.e. it doesn't matter what the BIBLE says to them when it is different than their religion).
Minus fifty-seven, this is where I came in. You are arguing in circles and ignoring what's already been covered.
Considering this is a christian forum.....I'm going to argue the christian points.