A church near me has a woman pastor senior pastor. My take on this that a woman should not be the senior pastor of a church. In which the Bible speaks highly against it.
What is your take on this?
What is your take on this?
Please cross-reference that law so we can see from at least 2 witnesses1 Corinthians 14:34-35 KJV
34 Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law.
35 And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.
They claim that Paul was speaking about a certain problem which exclusively existed in the Corinthian Church in relation to certain women and that it isn't applicable to ALL churches. The problem with that explanation is that he doesn't describe any such specific disruptive church-attendance problem involving women in the Corinthian church prior to making that statement.1 Corinthians 14:34-35 KJV
34 Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law.
35 And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.
Do you need three references for thou shalt not murder as well? If a scripture is straightforward clear-why the suspicion?Please cross-reference that law so we can see from at least 2 witnesses
The bible specifies 2 witnesses. I suggest you use that for any bible study to get an accurate interpretation. 3 would be betterDo you need three references for thou shalt not murder as well? If a scripture is straightforward clear-why the suspicion?
A church near me has a woman pastor senior pastor. My take on this that a woman should not be the senior pastor of a church. In which the Bible speaks highly against it.
What is your take on this?
That was referring to judicial cases and not to statements that need no further clarifications. Why do you feel that what Paul said needs further clarification? Does he need further clarification when he tells us that the Law was only a shadow of things to come or that Jesus was the last Adam?The bible specifies 2 witnesses. I suggest you use that for any bible study to get an accurate interpretation. 3 would be better
Jesus said just the thought incriminates
A church near me has a woman pastor senior pastor. My take on this that a woman should not be the senior pastor of a church. In which the Bible speaks highly against it.
What is your take on this?
You should do what you feel is right for you. Just make sure you're convictions are backed with truth. The spiritual law not the letter of the lawReally I guess I should go away then.
Why do you ignor what Paul says that there is no difference between believers and that we should all submit to each other?That was referring to judicial cases and not to statements that need no further clarifications. Why do you feel that what Paul said needs further clarification? Does he need further clarification when he tells us that the Law was only a shadow of things to come or that Jesus was the second Adam? Or that Adam was NOT deceived but Eve was? Can you provide it? The concepts are novel to the NT itself and aren't mentioned by any other Apostle. Are we to reject them because of that? Can you substantiate the statements of Jude that Michael disputed over Moses' body with the Devil and then said: "May the Lord Rebuke you!"? Of course not and they need no further support.
Maybe you should look at the whole quote and quit cherry pickingThat sums it all up,do what thou will shall be the whole of the law.