I am not sure about 'identical' after all the original kind would have adapted a lot. But I have no real doubt a lion will still be a lion.
And would it look like a lion? What we consider to be the "lion look" today?
I fail to see how it would be coincidence for life processes to fall into line with the forces and laws that exist?
*Sigh*
Let me use an analogy, which is no doubt going to be a waste of my time, but I'd hate for you to be able to claim that I couldn't repsond to you.
Let's say that I'm trying to build a house in the DSP. The laws are different, so the laws governing how rocks are will be different. Since a brick is basically made of rock, a brick won't be like the present state bricks. Let's say they are twice as dense, so they are twice as heavy. And because I'm in the dsp, then the laws governing the way wood grows will be different as well. But maybe the different laws mean that wood is going to be much weaker, maybe like that styrofoam packing frame stuff you get when you buy a washing machine. Now, because of this, I'm going to need to build this house with a lot more wooden supports to hold up the extra heavy bricks. Otherwise the house will collapse. So I build this house, and then time passes. We get to the present day and the house is still standing.
We are going to see one of two things.
We might see that the wood and bricks that were used remain in the same form that they were in during the DSP. In other words, the wooden beams are still very weak compared to today's wooden beams, and the bricks are much heavier than today's bricks. This, obviously, would indicate that the laws were different, since we could see wood and bricks that behave very unlike modern wood and bricks.
Or maybe the qualities of those materials changed and are now acting the same way as modern wood and bricks. But, the house doesn't magically lose some of the wooden beams. People are still going to look at this house and say, "Gee, Kylie really used a lot of wooden beams to hold this place up. But she didn't need to use anywhere near that many. Why would she go so overboard with the wooden beams?" And this would also be an indication that things were different back then.
But we never see this. We never see anything that indicates this kind of differing relationship. And not just with wood and bricks, but with pretty much anything we look at.
Now, you can try to explain it away, but the only way you can do this is to claim that the laws all changed in proportion with each other. That is, if the bricks were twice as heavy, then the wooden beams MUST have been twice as strong! This is the ONLY way you can explain this, by claiming that EVERY SINGLE LAW OF NATURE CHANGED BY THE SAME AMOUNT AND IN THE SAME DIRECTION.
But if that is what happened, then it can't possibly serve as an explanation for why people allegedly had much longer lifespans, because all the changes would have had to balance each other out and there would therefore have been no noticeable difference.
As much as you'd like to give credit for mankind existing to some godless vague notion of 'evolution', you would need more than to look at bacteria now and see some evolving and jump to insane conclusions.
If you think our understanding of evolution is "vague", then you really have no idea what you are talking about. Why don't you actually learn something about it so you don't make these silly mistakes and embarrass yourself?
Part of slugging sometimes involves slogans.
What a shame you don't have anything of substance to back them up...
Not sure why you would take some personal offense to having the fools fable factory of science exposed as being not of God and not based on knowledge.
Oh please. Your comment was about as offensive as when my daughter was little and she called me a poo-poo-head when she got mad.
And you exposed nothing. You simply made a claim, and anyone can make a claim about anything. You need actual EVIDENCE to expose something.
It is not the act of memorizing fables that truly constitutes learning.
No, it is learning how to find things out for yourself, and then testing those things to find out if they are true or false. Maybe one day you'll start doing that as well.