Is is possible that God is using means through me to teach you about brotherly love?
Yes.
Patience for absolute sure.
Marvin, you know I don't get my doctrine from the WCF. This is where you get yours. I do not believe what they wrote. Just because some men got together to write their views on God, does not make it truth.
I don't get my doctrine from the WCF either. Where did you get the idea that I did?
Of course it doesn't make it so and of course you are free to agree or disagree with them on some points and I am free to do the same (as I do).
But since you have taken it upon yourself to be a critic of so called Calvinism and since the WCF is almost almost universally seen by Calvinists to be in line with their doctrine - it stands to reason that the WCF could and should be cited frequently as a matter of discussion concerning what Calvinists believe.
Since you keep misrepresenting what they believe, it only stands to reason that I would present it again as proof that you are doing so. I have done and will continue to do exactly that.
And yet you continue to misstate Calvinist beliefs. Somewhere along the line after a year or so one has to wonder if you are a liar or just not very sharp. No offense meant - that's just logical truth.
One of the most offensive statements is that God has predestined some men to eternal life, and foreordained some to eternal damnation. Don't you understand that is very offensive to millions of people?
Yes I do understand that the misrepresented way that you present what Calvinists believe is highly offensive to many. It would be to me also if it were an accurate statement of what they believe.
But (for at least 20 or 30 times now) the Reformed doctrine of predestination includes the ability of men to make choices and the fact that they will make those choices and the fact that they will be judged fairly because of them.
If you are talking about unconditional election on the other hand - that doctrine if "more than fair" simply because God owes nothing to people who have used their wills to sin against Him. If He chooses to extend extra grace to some to show His grace in the ages to come and chooses to pass others by and leave them to the consequences of their sins to show forth His righteous judgment and holiness in the ages to come - that does not change for one minute that all men are guilty of sins against God.
These things have been pointed out to you time and time again concerning how you are wrong about what Calvinists believe and teach.
So you are playing your part in bringing to pass the damnation of people, right? Who in their right mind wants to understand that?
In a way yes.
Men are condemned when they hear the gospel proclaimed and yet refuse the grace it offers.
I want to understand that and play my part. The main reason being that I want to obey the Lord and do my job.
Were you predestined to be a child of darkness. Were you predestined to be lost before salvation?
Yes - I was predestined to be so before salvation came to me and was accepted.
The Apostle Paul and I are alike in that respect.
And before you say something really foolish again - when I accepted Christ I did not change what was predestined for me. I was predestined to be both lost for a portion of my life and saved for a portion of my life.
That concept is so easy to understand that I just have to think that you zeal for making witty come backs and the like are what has caused you to say the really foolish things you have said on this front.
Jesus, perhaps John the Baptist, and perhaps infants who die prematurely are the only exceptions I can think of to the concept of a dual status being predestined for display in different parts of their lives..
Understanding Calvinism and predestination is not required by God for salvation. I want nothing from Calvinism. Why can't you understand that?
Of course understanding Calvinism isn't required by God for Salvation. Who ever said that it was? No one here I trust.
If you have no need for Calvinism and you want nothing from it - then why on earth are you one of the most frequent posters on the subject? In fact you have gone out of your way to start threads just to draw out conversation on the doctrines of grace.
Frankly - I don't care much at all if you become a Calvinist or not. What I continue to care about is that you not be misrepresent what Calvinists believe and then when you are corrected from an authority on Calvinism (the WCF) you then
lie again and again by very "purposeful" misrepresentation.
Either that or you are simply the dullest tool in the shed and, after dealing with you for some time, I no longer believe that. That leads me to believe that you are lying. I have no other choice.
Besides, my wisdom comes from above, not from the WCF.
Wisdom from above would dictate that you would strive to understand the beliefs of others and make sure that you do not misrepresent them before you do a critique on them. Wisdom from above does not need to create straw men through misrepresentation.
My wisdom does not come from the WCF or any other man produced material.
I've been on this forum for years Marvin. I think I have seen the many facets of Reformed belief.
And yet you continue to misstate some of the most universally held doctrines of the Reformed belief.
You've really been doing this sort of thing for years?
That's a whole lot of things to answer for at the Judgment Seat of Christ - assuming you and I are both bound to appear there eventually.
Your friend Minno says he is a five-pointer, you say your are a four-pointer. Who is right Marvin? How does one understand your beliefs when you all can't make up your own minds on what to believe?
What's your point?
By the same measure you use - your non-Calvinist friends John Wesley and Joseph Smith both believe tremendously different than you do. You non-Calvinists "can't make up your own minds on what to believe".
If a person made it their goal in life to refute non-Calvinism (the reciprocal to your goal in life apparently) - that person would have to spend a dozen lifetimes on his given task.
Let's make this the last point by point marathon post. I just don't have the time for it.
Since you are the one with the beef against Reformed theology - just make a point or ask a question and then I'll respond to it.
OK?
P.S.
For what it's worth to you - if you start playing games here - we will end this. If you try hard to make it a legitimate give and take and play it straight - we may get somewhere.
First sign of silliness or repeating a charge against Calvinist which I have corrected you on and we'll pull the plug again.
We'll see how it goes.