Not only is the subject matter beyond your scope of comprehension but you are also hopelessly confused.
in this post you stated that space-time exists within your fishbowl.
I am confused about nothing here. Your attempts to obfuscate simply are exposed.
So now within the space of a couple of posts, the entire concept is rubbished because you have been exposed to ideas you have never even heard of.
The ideas any child could google are based on certain things. Those things were held up to dry, and you simply cannot deal with it. Your roaring lion turned out to be a pussycat.
So which one is it, does space-time exist within your fishbowl or is it a rubbish concept. You can't have it both ways.
To be clear, the fishbowl refers to the realm of man, and the area we live in and can move in. Another way to perhaps get a better conception of the term fishbowl is to use the word solar system. You have not been far beyond the solar system and to the stars. Really. In fact you don't even know much about the interior of the planet.
The foolishness lies in the fact you are prepared to contradict yourself rather than admit you have no comprehension.
You have the opportunity to state simply your case. I see grand allusions and vague double talk, mixed with a few high sounding words. Unless you can focus, and articulate a cohesive simple and clear position, we must flush.
Since you don't understand what proper time is let me give you a couple of simple examples. Your biological clock keeps proper time as is the radioactive half life of Nickel 56.
It's called proper time because it is the time kept in an object's frame of reference irrespective of its location in space time. Funny isn't it how the radioactive decay of Nickel 56 is observed in the spectrum of distant supernovae, something that shouldn't occur if time doesn't exist outside the fishbowl....
Hilarious. You are claiming radioactivity exists in all the universe, and that all points in the universe are 'spacetime'. You actually do not know what space or time even are. You do not know if time exists as we think of it in the far universe either. We do not know that our bodies could exist in the far universe even, no one has been there. Yes, we see light curves that seem to represent radioactive decay in space. But we see that only here for one thing, and our information is less than perfect or complete. If we need to explain some aspect of a light curve, we might invoke a 'dynamic process' after a core collapse to have been responsible..etc etc. There is a lot of assumptions built in to any claim.
http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/...=0&data_type=GIF&type=SCREEN_VIEW&classic=YES
So why didn't you take the opportunity of showing the errors of my way "Pal".
Your inability to do so only demonstrates mock bravado and is nothing more than an attempt to hide your ignorance on the subject.
The error is that you are preaching faith based nonsense.
This is bordering on pure comedy. The principle has been around for about a century and is taught at undergraduate physics and applied mathematics level ever since.
Too bad. It is wrong. At least it is limited and not something we define the universe itself with. Man's concepts are relative to man's realm.
It serves as an introduction to the application of physics to the entire Universe which culminated in General Relativity.
Big talk, based on nothing. Your fishbowl philosophies and rules apply in man's world. Not in all creation. Man does not even know creation exists! Man has painted creation with his little two bit concepts, godless conjecture, belief system and imagined it to be the non created universe, all obeying man's little ideas.
Since you seem to know more than anyone else why don't you submit a paper and pick up the prize at Stockholm.
Don't confuse not knowing and admitting not knowing with knowing more than the poor sods who thought they knew!
Does it really?
Please cite chapter and verse.
One example, is in Daniel. Daniel prayed, and as soon as he opened his eyes, there was an angel from beyond the stars, the very throne of God, who was there already! The info came a lot faster than light!
Dan 9:
20 And whiles I was speaking, and praying, and confessing my sin and the sin of my people Israel, and presenting my supplication before the LORD my God for the holy mountain of my God;
21 Yea,
whiles I was speaking in prayer, even the man Gabriel, whom I had seen in the vision at the beginning, being caused to fly swiftly, touched me about the time of the evening oblation.
22 And he informed me, and talked with me, and said, O Daniel, I am now come forth to give thee skill and understanding.
23 At the beginning of thy supplications the commandment came forth, and I am come to shew thee; for thou art greatly beloved: therefore understand the matter, and consider the vision
You don't understand Quantum mechanics either.
Hey, who does?
Entangled particles are the result of the superimposition of the quantum wave states of the particles where they are spread out over space time rather than occupying a specific point.
So what causes something to be superimposed? Then the question arises...if info between entangled particles in space and time (regardless of where in space) have the same behavior, and each do the same thing 'instantly' ..then how fast is info exchanged? What causes it?
Not only do you exhibit a profound lack of basic comprehension skills, your post is riddled with logical errors.
First of all is the mundane argument by repetition.
Repeating the same nonsense over and over doesn't make it right.
You forgot to say what was not right exactly. Stop flailing your hands in the air and focus.
Secondly you fail to provide any evidence of what happens outside the fishbowl, with good reason because you know very well that it is impossible to do so.
Bingo! So don't blame me when I point out that science can't do it.
Yet you accuse others of engaging in faith based arguments when you own idea is purely faith based and not even falsifiable which doesn't make a scientific argument.
There IS no scientific argument that covers the creation of God, and the stars and time! There is godless speculation falsely called science.
Thirdly your argument is the same as stating the tooth fairy exists by noting no one has proven their non existence.
The logical fallacy here is trying to prove a negative which is impossible.
Wrong, since what I am saying is that you do not know after all. Your posts prove it. I do not need to know what goes on in the far corners of the created universe, far beyond man's little realm. Science does claim to know.
Finally is the application of Occam's razor which by the way is not a mandatory argument but has application here.
Which is easier to understand a Universe where time exists throughout or your fishbowl?
In the universe you made up, there is no creation. No God. No angels. No spirits. No place where time does not exist the same as earth. No place where fishbowl thinking does not rule!
You cannot even explain the very concept of velocity outside your fishbowl.
No? Well, is something moves...does it take time? Well, why would I explain how something would move without time? The issue is not whether we can sit there explaining what we have no clue about all the live long day! You thought that was science?! My idea of science is that is has to be based on some knowledge.
