Then why aren't you using it?There may be 100s of faulty translations but there is only ONE AUTHORIZED VERSION OF THE BIBLE.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Then why aren't you using it?There may be 100s of faulty translations but there is only ONE AUTHORIZED VERSION OF THE BIBLE.
Maybe you should start.I'm not questioning God,
Well, I don't have to put Noah in New Jersey, have Adam & Eve speaking English, or sending flood water to Neptune, or utilize 'creation science', to believe in God.Maybe you should start.
Actually, the version of the bible, which is not the original.I think he's questioning your peculiar interpretation of scripture.
And I don't have to deny God created the earth Himself, wonder how He orchestrated the breakup of Pangaea because tectonic plates got in the way, or wonder how three men survived an overheated furnace.Well, I don't have to put Noah in New Jersey, have Adam & Eve speaking English, or sending flood water to Neptune, or utilize 'creation science', to believe in God.
I'm not denying he created the earth. I just don't view the creation story a literal, as probably the majority of Christians today do not.And I don't have to deny God created the earth Himself, wonder how He orchestrated the breakup of Pangaea because tectonic plates got in the way, or wonder how three men survived an overheated furnace.
Maybe he should ask God for help in understanding, instead of stopping just short of ridicule, not answering questions as they were asked, or being so quick to deny things?I think he's questioning your peculiar interpretation of scripture.
That was a reference to your WHO'S "US" line of bologna.I'm not denying he created the earth. I just don't view the creation story a literal, as probably the majority of Christians today do.
You still don't understand what I'm getting at. You say I ignore parts of the bible, and that would be a no, I view them as not meant to be literal. Then you say you use the only authorized bible. I disagree. Your authorized bible not only excludes 7 original books, the Gospels don't match those of the oldest known bible in existence, the Codex Sinaiticus.Maybe he should ask God for help in understanding, instead of stopping just short of ridicule, not answering questions as they were asked, or being so quick to deny things?
There may be 100s of faulty translations but there is only ONE AUTHORIZED VERSION OF THE BIBLE.
You mean that piece of trash found in a trash can because the common people wouldn't touch it?... the Gospels don't match those of the oldest known bible in existence, the Codex Sinaiticus.
So you are calling the oldest known bible a piece of trash. And you say I pick and choose.You mean that piece of trash found in a trash can because the common people wouldn't touch it?
Um ... no.Right, the very same piece of trash your precious 1611 is loosely based on.
This thread stems from a conversation I just had with RickG.
I shall try to be as concise as I can with my questions, and all I ask in reply is for honest answers.
Question: In your opinion, are there some global flood believers out there who believe the earth was one giant landmass in Noah's time?
Just YES or NO please?
Are you aware of the fact that there are people who study the origins and evolution of language, and the "tower of Babel" myth doesn't comport?Yes, Genesis 10:25 indicates that the earth was divided during the days of Peleg following the flood, hence, the meaning of his name. Nimrod is considered to be an anti-type of this concept since I believe one of the purposes of spreading out the land masses was so people could spread out. Ok, they didn't want to do that, so God confused their languages.