Real time or evo time?

[Kylie]

You can't do that for the far pat when Adam lived. You look at laws and thermodynamics etc..NOW.

And I can look at the traces that were left behind THEN.

And oh golly gee willickers! Those traces are exactly what we'd expect if there was a SAME STATE PAST!

What could it mean?

 

[dad]

Reality is beyond your DSP idea.

God is beyond your science. So is the past.

 

[dad]

And I can look at the traces that were left behind THEN.

Traces from then are seen here and now only! How they got how they are depends on the laws of that day.

And oh golly gee willickers! Those traces are exactly what we'd expect if there was a SAME STATE PAST!

Or a DSP...or anything one sets out first using to interpret evidences.

What could it mean?

People see what they want. When we see an isotope with what is now a long half life all that tells us is that the stuff is now in this state and slowly decaying. It does not tell us it all got her from decay.

 

[lesliedellow]

Does this not assume there IS time there?

I knew it. Dream up whatever crazed idea may be neceaasry to try and defend the indefensible.

That's why I don't waste my time on you.

 

[dad]

I knew it. Dream up whatever crazed idea may be neceaasry to try and defend the indefensible.

That's why I don't waste my time on you.

You are defeated and cannot begin to prove time as we know it exists in deep space. Don't pretend you have something to contribute but golly gee just won't. Gong!

For this world in its present form is passing away.
— 1 Corinthians 7:31

 

[lesliedellow]

You are defeated and cannot begin to prove time as we know it exists in deep space. Don't poretend you have something to contribute but golly gee just won't. Gong!

 

[AirPo]

You have no understanding of what I'm actually saying, do you?

(I suspect that you will reply by saying you do understand, and then post some unsupported denial.)

Noah's day is beyond your parable of the tub.

QED

 

[AirPo]

http://www.reasons.org/articles/stronger-and-more-comprehensive-tests-affirm-the-universe’s-unchanging-physics

I await yet another of your ad hoc hypotheses.

That's like waiting for the sun to come up.

 

[AirPo]

You are defeated and cannot begin to prove time as we know it exists in deep space. Don't poretend you have something to contribute but golly gee just won't. Gong!

For this world in its present form is passing away.
— 1 Corinthians 7:31

Speaking of gongs, HI Theory threads are like the gong show.

 

[lesliedellow]

That's like waiting for the sun to come up.

It might not happen, you mean?

 

[AirPo]

It might not happen, you mean?

Not if dad makes up that it won't happen.

 

[dad]

QED

So what would you think is a good solid evidence from science that the physics we know now existed in Noah's day?
(my current opinion is that his day was likely somewhere near the KT layer extinction time)

 

[dad]

It might not happen, you mean?

One day...no.
Joe 2:10 -The earth shall quake before them; the heavens shall tremble: the sun and the moon shall be dark, and the stars shall withdraw their shining:


Eze 32:7 -And when I shall put thee out, I will cover the heaven, and make the stars thereof dark; I will cover the sun with a cloud, and the moon shall not give her light.

Thus saith the Almighty...directly quoted.

But first, this..

Isa 30:26 - Moreover the light of the moon shall be as the light of the sun, and the light of the sun shall be sevenfold, as the light of seven days, in the day that the LORD bindeth up the breach of his people, and healeth the stroke of their wound.

Now that is REAL science! Modern peanut gallery manscience can't predict it's way out of a paper bag.

 

[AirPo]

So what would you think is a good solid evidence from science that the physics we know now existed in Noah's day?
(my current opinion is that his day was likely somewhere near the KT layer extinction time)

Everything that you have ed away over the past ten years would be a good place to start.

 

[lesliedellow]

Everything that you have ed away over the past ten years would be a good place to start.

He used to confine himself to theology, before deciding to let science share in the enormous benefit of having his intellect applied to it.

 

[dad]

Everything that you have ed away over the past ten years would be a good place to start.

It is clear no one can support a same state past, and that one is required for the models of science. One big thing they use to say there were the same laws, is radioactive decay that we now have. I do not wave away radioactive decay now. That doesn't prove there always was any though. Nothing needs waving away except the beliefs they try to sneak in.

 

[dad]

He used to confine himself to theology, before deciding to let science share in the enormous benefit of having his intellect applied to it.

Science draws a circle and keeps God and the spiritual out. Once one looks at the actual basis for the models of science regarding the future or past, it takes no great intellect to see it is purely intellectually lobotomized nonsense and religion. I have no intellect to waste on delving inside the rabbit hole of inbred and circular dream states of science so called. That to me would show a lack of smarts, to be sucked into a demonic chasm of God omitting never neverland dreamscapes of the damned. Whether they practice their devoid godless speculation on the future of man and the earth or universe, or whether they project their pathetic pagan prognostications on the past and creation....it is total belief based and bogus baloney.

 

[lesliedellow]

Science draws a circle and keeps God and the spiritual out. Once one looks at the actual basis for the models of science regarding the future or past, it takes no great intellect to see it is purely intellectually lobotomized nonsense and religion. I have no intellect to waste on delving inside the rabbit hole of inbred and circular dream states of science so called.

Please switch off that computer. You must be in a dream state if you think it is working. After all, "science so called" is all nonsense, so it can't be working, can it?

 

[AirPo]

It is clear no one can support a same state past, and that one is required for the models of science. One big thing they use to say there were the same laws, is radioactive decay that we now have. I do not wave away radioactive decay now. That doesn't prove there always was any though. Nothing needs waving away except the beliefs they try to sneak in.

No, it's been clear for over ten years that The HI Theory does not recoginize anything other than the HI Theory. Hence the third law, Rufutation is futile.

 

[dad]

No, it's been clear for over ten years that The HI Theory does not recoginize anything other than the HI Theory. Hence the third law, Rufutation is futile.

No science or bible then. OK.