Jadis40
Senior Member
- Sep 19, 2004
- 963
- 192
- 51
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Methodist
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Republican
Isn't it just too convenient that the figure of 93,000,000 million miles coincides with the only alternative to see the sun at the size we see it at? What were the probabilities of that. Using math, we can determine the relative distance of the sun from Earth. It is in the thousands of miles, maximum.
Lies, all lies. There is no such thing as a light year, as it has no real application to the Biblical Earth. This is made-up deception, people.
The sun is not a star. Read God's Word. Stars are stars, and so-called "planets" are the largest, brightest stars. They are the wandering stars, considering they move in different pathways instead of a fixed rotation like the smaller stars. Look up at the sky at night and you can actually see them move if you have the patience to stay there for a couple hours. That said, you can see them move across the sky at times. The solid-like pictures you see are straight up trickery from a computer. Do you ever wonder why we now get these so-called photos, when all we got were artist recreations prior to the last couple decades? It's because the technology or software wasn't advanced enough to make such images. In fact, some of the earlier "pictures" of the Earth were nothing but paintings.
Andromeda is out of an artist's imagination.
Galaxies don't exist. The Jesuits and Masons have been involved in astronomy, or fooling the masses, whether intended or not, for many centuries.
You need to do your research.
I have done my research. Enough to know that are your claims are complete and utter nonsense.
1. The sun *is* a star by the dictionary definition of the word:
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/star
star
(stär)
n.
1.
a. A celestial body that generates light and other radiant energy and consists of a mass of gas held together by its own gravity in which the energy generated by nuclear reactions in the interior is balanced by the outflow of energy to the surface, and the inward-directed gravitational forces are balanced by the outward-directed gas and radiation pressures.
b. Any of the celestial bodies visible at night from Earth as relatively stationary, usually twinkling points of light.
c. Something regarded as resembling such a celestial body.
Is the sun a celestial body? Yes.
Does it generate its own light and radiant energy, consisting of a mass of gas held together by its own gravity? Yes.
Is it powered by nuclear reactions in its interior, and held in balance by outward and inward flow of energy which are balanced? Yes.
Sounds like a star to me, regardless of your claims to the contrary.
Again, we go back to elementary school and high school level science. No one denies that the planets move across the sky during the night, but they do so on the ecliptic, which is the same path as the moon. That's why they always appear to move along the same path.
One more time: The planets are *not* stars. They don't even fit the definition of one, which I posted above. Mercury is not a star. Jupiter is not a star. Pluto is not a star. If you want to claim differently, I can't stop you, but I will call you out on that claim as being false.
And I know Andromeda is real, contrary to your opinion. I've seen it myself. All the other galaxies are real too.
The universe is a lot bigger than you seem to think it is. So, who do I choose to believe? The men and women who have dedicated their lives to furthering man's knowledge. I can't help it if you don't like the answers they've found, which includes the fact that the earth is a sphere and there is no dome covering the earth.
I also can't help it if you can't accept the answer that the sun is a star and is 92.96 million miles away, and that the spherical earth completes one revolution around the sun every 365 days, give or take a day, accounting for leap years.
Last edited:
Upvote
0