I wanted to pop this into the discussion since others are posting their meme of preference.
Hi Blondepudding, you seem like a genuine person so I'd suggest that you desist from using that meme in the future. It's a quote mine and as such is a deliberate misrepresentation of what Darwin actually said.
What he actually said was this:
"To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of Spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree. When it was first said that the sun stood still and the world turned round, the common sense of mankind declared the doctrine false; but the old saying of Vox populi, vox Dei ["the voice of the people = the voice of God "], as every philosopher knows, cannot be trusted in science. Reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a simple and imperfect eye to one complex and perfect can be shown to exist, each grade being useful to its possessor, as is certain the case; if further, the eye ever varies and the variations be inherited, as is likewise certainly the case; and if such variations should be useful to any animal under changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, should not be considered as subversive of the theory."
I hope that you can understand that twisting the meaning what someone says by taking it out of context and using it to imply that they meant the opposite is extremely disonest - i.e lying.
As I say, you seem like a nice person, I'm definately not accusing you of dishonesty in any way, but hopefully you will see that Creationist propaganda is not to be trusted on face value as it will purposely misrepresent, twist or just ignore established science to further it's agenda.
