I would suggest the RCC is not the only "church" guilty of that so to use it against them alone is unfair.You mean secret pedophile rings within the RCC...like that?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I would suggest the RCC is not the only "church" guilty of that so to use it against them alone is unfair.You mean secret pedophile rings within the RCC...like that?
Why do you single out RC's when this perversion knows no religious or cultural bounds? You might hear of more RC cases than Protestant or otherwise, but that is simply because the RC Church greatly outnumbers all others.You mean secret pedophile rings within the RCC...like that?
No, it is sort of like Rorschach test. People will see the connections they want to see. From a historical and linguistic point of view however, there is no connection at all.I did not say that the RCC is mystery Babylon. The connections are there to paganism though. But nothing I say or show you will convince you. Simply, it is something the Holy Spirit has to open each persons eyes to.
I would suggest the RCC is not the only "church" guilty of that so to use it against them alone is unfair.
Why do you single out RC's when this perversion knows no religious or cultural bounds? You might hear of more RC cases than Protestant or otherwise, but that is simply because the RC Church greatly outnumbers all others.
It seems a little incredulous that they would even have had to have had to draw lots if the Holy Spirit really wanted someone in particular. Jesus got Saul/Paul when He wanted him.They prayed to the Holy Spirit, and then cast lots. You're saying that chance has nothing to do with the Holy Spirit? I say, if you pray before you cast lots, that the prayer has an effect. Anyway, God, in the person of the Holy Spirit, chose Matthias.
I did not say that the RCC is mystery Babylon. The connections are there to paganism though. But nothing I say or show you will convince you. Simply, it is something the Holy Spirit has to open each persons eyes to.
Even if each of those is true, it doesn't mean that every one of Peter's own successors in Rome is to basically be the emperor of every other Christian. After all, in 40 AD, Jerusalem was the center of Christianity and James was the bishop there. In Acts at the Council of Jerusalem, James is the one who states the final decision, which Peter had only previously proposed.The only person named Rock in the Bible is Peter. Kephas is the Aramaic word, means Rock.
Wrong, just wrong. The apostles were, themselves hand picked by Christ, but they ordained successors, every one of them.
If I say 'I have a car and a truck that's blue', which one is blue? The very "I say unto the, that thou are Kephas and upon this kephas I will build my church...' means Peter is Rock.
At the time of Christ the Greek Petros/petra were literally synonyms.
See above. Christ is certainly the foundation, but Peter is the Rock upon which the Church was built.
Rock. Not stone.
In Australia we have been having a Royal Commission into child abuse and even though George Pell refused to come back to Australia to answer questions in a legal hearing he did answer questions. The scale of abuse that has come to light in Australia is, to put it blunty, simply gargantuan but at no stage has it come to light that the RCC has a bigger problem than other groups whether Christian based or not.Sure there are wolves out there in many places and "denominations". However, the problem is far and widespread among the RCC. To this there is no doubt and it is a fact, so much so even the current pope is forced to admit it.
Um why only the split between East and West. The pope was the cause of the Reformation, his (in)actions caused Luther to write the thesis, his (in)actions caused the split. The idea that the separation between East and West is somehow greater than the separation between the RCC and Protestants is somehow lesser is ludicrous.If you (the OP) want to say that the Roman Catholic Church is a continuation of the early Church but that Protestant leaders like John Wesley started their own movements in the 16th-18th centuries, I can understand that.
But if you want to say that the Roman church is the only church that continues directly the 1st century Church, then I disagree because we have the EO Church.
If you say that the EO Church doesn't count because the Pope and his followers are always right or always part of the "true" church, then as a matter of simple logic I disagree because the RC Church teaches that there have been heretic Popes a the time when Eastern Christians were not heretics. That is the RC position. You can't automatically say that your position must be right because the Pope teaches it.
So if you really want to argue that the RC is "right", you have to go back and judge whether or not the Pope was right to break Christianity in half in 1054 AD.
But there are many churches (and cults) which have had members exposed as being pedophiles. (More were/are covered up than ever exposed, I'm sure.) There have been just as many as in secular organizations, too. I don't think the verse is being that general here. Will have to look into it further.You mean secret pedophile rings within the RCC...like that?
It appears you are ignoring the truth here because you haven't responded to post #171 which showed you to be doing what you claim hasn't happened in this thread. Is this denial or ignoring of reality a feature of the "catholic" beliefs?I've been challenging the OP from early in this thread and haven't been met with what you describe above.
Wow! jesus-is-lord dot com is still up? Haven't seen that place since my Left Behind days!
Is it still an unintentionally hilarious viper pit of hatred and misdirected self-righteousness written by a toddler with a crayon?
Frankly the more I read your posts you appear to hold more to Catholic dogma than any other....interesting in itself.
Shuzbutt!Nanu nanu.
No, it does not say the dead pray for us anywhere in the bible.
Yes, we get that the heretical doctrine of the modern Catholic Church does not allow the recognition of some Popes as heretics
That's very true. Death has no power to separate us from Jesus Christ. We will never die because we have HIS eternal Spirit. Not from anything we do. We have no power of ourselves. I'm sure you know that. But to say that believers who have passed into glory can intercede for us is essentially believing that they now are "other Christ's".
I am missing the point. Please explain.First of all, they are not dead.
Second of all, you are mistaken:
Rev. 5:8
. 8When He had taken the scroll, thefour living creatures and the twenty-fourelders fell down before the Lamb. Each onehad a harp, and they held the golden bowlsfull of incense, which are the prayers of the saints.