The Pinnacle of Evolution

[-57]

What scientific evidence is there that Adam and Eve were the first humans 6000 years ago? Don't you count Neolithic cultures?

For example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peiligang_culture

What scientific evidense is there that there is no God?

 

[lesliedellow]

What scientific evidense is there that there is no God?

There is no scientific evidence either way.

 

[-57]

There is no scientific evidence either way.

I would tend to disagree.

 

[Jimmy D]

What scientific evidense is there that there is no God?

I don't know. What's that got to do with my question anyway? Joshua claimed to have scientific evidence, I was asking what it is.

 

[joshua 1 9]

What scientific evidence is there that Adam and Eve were the first humans 6000 years ago? Don't you count Neolithic cultures?

For example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peiligang_culture

We are talking about the Eden in the Middle East, what is refereed to as Mesopotamia. We are not talking about the Eden in the Yellow River area of china. Just look at the food and the difference between the Asian foods and the foods that came out of the Middle East. Just think of them as two different branches on the tree of mankind. The Eden for all of mankind we are told was in Africa.

 

[joshua 1 9]

I don't know. What's that got to do with my question anyway? Joshua claimed to have scientific evidence, I was asking what it is.

Your getting the threads mixed up. The evidence for God has to do with the brain scans and areas of the brain that are active in theists and not active in atheists. Atheists use one part of their brain and theists use a different part of their brain.

 

[bhsmte]

What scientific evidense is there that there is no God?

Did someone claim there was?

 

[bhsmte]

I would tend to disagree.

Ok. Please demonstrate.

 

[bhsmte]

Your getting the threads mixed up. The evidence for God has to do with the brain scans and areas of the brain that are active in theists and not active in atheists. Atheists use one part of their brain and theists use a different part of their brain.

Qnd this demonstrates there is a god how exactly?

 

[-57]

Ok. Please demonstrate.

 

[bhsmte]

View attachment 174147

Cool picture.

Please demonstrate what it means, with specifics.

 

[Hoghead1]

What scientific evidense is there that there is no God?

God is definitely not a scientific question, to begin with. Science qua science is totally neutral on the question of God.

 

[Hoghead1]

Your getting the threads mixed up. The evidence for God has to do with the brain scans and areas of the brain that are active in theists and not active in atheists. Atheists use one part of their brain and theists use a different part of their brain.

Yes, but how does this scientifically prove God?

 

[bhsmte]

Yes, but how does this scientifically prove God?

Good question, I asked it the other day.

The answer is; it doesn't.

 

[Hoghead1]

Good question, I asked it the other day.

The answer is; it doesn't.

Well, OK.

 

[PsychoSarah]

I would tend to disagree.

Then you need to provide the evidence for that, and the bible by itself is not gonna fly here.

 

[PsychoSarah]

Same difference as Forest says: "stupid is as stupid does".

Stupidity has limits too. I'd say objects that aren't alive are at the bottom, unless you think there is such a thing as a sentient crystal or something. Actually, as far as I am concerned, stupidity is far more limited than genius.

 

[PsychoSarah]

Yes and I have two hours a day to answer questions. There are limits though because I can not spend all day dealing with the usual pratt questions (point refuted a thousand times). People need to come up with something new and different that we have not already gone over a million billion times.

It's not like we coordinate our actions. It's just that a lot of people find discussions you participate in comment worthy. I'd take it as a compliment; it means that you're interesting, at the very least. We can't really work together to increase or decrease the questions aimed at you, not because it is technically impossible, but because we'd never put aside the time to designate when and how much each of us could respond to you just at your request. There's being considerate, and then there's being a doormat.

 

[joshua 1 9]

It's not like we coordinate our actions. It's just that a lot of people find discussions you participate in comment worthy. I'd take it as a compliment; it means that you're interesting, at the very least. We can't really work together to increase or decrease the questions aimed at you, not because it is technically impossible, but because we'd never put aside the time to designate when and how much each of us could respond to you just at your request. There's being considerate, and then there's being a doormat.

Yes, I was just responding to a question as to why I was not answering more of the questions on here. We all have to establish boundaries or limits in life. No one can do that for us, it is something we need to do for ourselves. I actually enjoy the analytical conversations on this forum. I believe the Bible is fully able to stand up to analytical scrutiny.

 

[joshua 1 9]

Stupidity has limits too. I'd say objects that aren't alive are at the bottom, unless you think there is such a thing as a sentient crystal or something. Actually, as far as I am concerned, stupidity is far more limited than genius.

There are some that believe rocks have consciousness, but I have not looked into that to much. It is more of the Native American Indian and Hindu or Buddhists beliefs.